Recommendations for progression criteria during external randomised pilot trial design, conduct, analysis and reporting

被引:29
作者
Mellor, Katie [1 ]
Albury, Charlotte [2 ]
Dutton, Susan J. [1 ]
Eldridge, Sandra [3 ]
Hopewell, Sally [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Ctr Stat Med, Nuffield Dept Orthopaed Rheumatol & Musculoskeleta, Oxford Clin Trials Res Unit, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Oxford, England
[3] Queen Mary Univ London, Inst Populat Hlth Sci, Barts & London Sch Med & Dent, London, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Pilot; Feasibility; PAFS; Progression criteria; Recommendations; PUBLICATION;
D O I
10.1186/s40814-023-01291-5
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background External randomised pilot trials aim to assess whether a future definitive Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) is feasible. Prespecified progression criteria help guide the interpretation of pilot trial findings to decide whether, and how, a definitive RCT should be conducted. This commentary presents a set of proposed recommendations for progression criteria to guide researchers when (i) designing, (ii) conducting, (iii) analysing and (iv) reporting external randomised pilot trials. Methods Recommendations were developed following a mixed methods approach. This involved (i) a methodological review of pilot trial publications, (ii) a cross-sectional study of pilot trial research funding applications, (iii) qualitative interviews with pilot trial researchers and (iv) a survey of corresponding authors of identified pilot trial publications. Initial recommendations were refined following two consultation stakeholder workshops held in July 2022. Recommendations for progression criteria for external randomised pilot trials: i. Design: consider progression criteria from the earliest opportunity; map progression criteria to feasibility objectives; consider quantitative and qualitative interpretations of feasibility; provide justification; develop guidelines rather than rules; seek input from relevant stakeholders. ii. Conduct: regularly monitor pilot trial data against progression criteria. iii. Analysis: avoid considering each progression criterion in isolation; engage in discussion with relevant stakeholders; consider context and other factors external to the pilot trial; consider feasibility (can we?) and progression (will we?). iv. Reporting: we propose a reporting checklist in relation to progression criteria and recommend reporting in a table format for clarity. Conclusion These recommendations provide a helpful resource for researchers to consider progression criteria at different stages of external randomised pilot trials. We have produced a simple infographic tool to summarise these recommendations for researchers to refer to. Further research is needed to evaluate whether these proposed recommendations should inform future development, or update, of established guidelines for the design, conduct, analysis and reporting of external randomised pilot trials.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Understanding randomised controlled trials
    Akobeng, AK
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2005, 90 (08) : 840 - 844
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2015, PILOT FEASIBILITY ST, DOI DOI 10.1186/S40814-015-0033-Z
  • [3] [Anonymous], THEM 6 COST RAND TRI
  • [4] Informing efficient randomised controlled trials: exploration of challenges in developing progression criteria for internal pilot studies
    Avery, Kerry N. L.
    Williamson, Paula R.
    Gamble, Carrol
    Francischetto, Elaine O'Connell
    Metcalfe, Chris
    Davidson, Peter
    Williams, Hywel
    Blazeby, Jane M.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (02):
  • [5] Pilot and feasibility studies: extending the conceptual framework
    Bond, Christine
    Lancaster, Gillian A.
    Campbell, Mike
    Chan, Claire
    Eddy, Saskia
    Hopewell, Sally
    Mellor, Katie
    Thabane, Lehana
    Eldridge, Sandra
    [J]. PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIES, 2023, 9 (01)
  • [6] A process for Decision-making after Pilot and feasibility Trials (ADePT): development following a feasibility study of a complex intervention for pelvic organ prolapse
    Bugge, Carol
    Williams, Brian
    Hagen, Suzanne
    Logan, Janet
    Glazener, Cathryn
    Pringle, Stewart
    Sinclair, Lesley
    [J]. TRIALS, 2013, 14
  • [7] Discontinuation and non-publication of surgical randomised controlled trials: observational study
    Chapman, Stephen J.
    Shelton, Bryony
    Mahmood, Humza
    Fitzgerald, J. Edward
    Harrison, Ewen M.
    Bhangu, Aneel
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 349
  • [8] A brief summary of pilot and feasibility studies: Exploring terminology, aims, and methods
    Donald, Graeme
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 24 : 65 - 70
  • [9] CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials
    Eldridge, Sandra M.
    Chan, Claire L.
    Campbell, Michael J.
    Bond, Christine M.
    Hopewell, Sally
    Thabane, Lehana
    Lancaster, Gillian A.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 355
  • [10] Defining Feasibility and Pilot Studies in Preparation for Randomised Controlled Trials: Development of a Conceptual Framework
    Eldridge, Sandra M.
    Lancaster, Gillian A.
    Campbell, Michael J.
    Thabane, Lehana
    Hopewell, Sally
    Coleman, Claire L.
    Bond, Christine M.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (03):