Implications of COVID-19 policies on the sustainable corporate practices of European firms

被引:2
作者
Liakh, Olena [1 ]
Mucelli, Attilio [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Civil Chem Environm & Mat Engn, Bologna, Italy
[2] Polytech Univ Marche, Dept Management, Ancona, Italy
关键词
CSR; COVID-19; Policies; Europe; Sustainability management; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; PUBLIC-POLICIES; CSR; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1108/K-07-2022-1014
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
PurposeThis study aims to analyze how mixes of COVID-19 policy responses are shaping the context in which companies will compete in the following years, defining how the crisis might impact firms' ability to keep their commitments to sustainable practices.Design/methodology/approachEuropean country-performance data for the years 2019 and 2020 were grouped into indicators of macro sustainability, then cross-analyzed against the policies adopted during the period (also grouped based on their impacts on sustainability pillars), using correlations, factor analysis and clustering.FindingsThe influence of traditional sustainability determinants was reframed according to the novel context shaped by the policy responses to the pandemic crisis. The social and digitalization aspects gained the most relevance and appeared interconnected, with digitalization of employment attaining overall more traction. Moreover, changes in the leadership within sustainability domains were observed for each identified country-cluster, due to newly implemented emergency policies. In fact, environmental innovation, digitalization and social support policies appeared to be the main variables to be impacted by the intensity of the policy efforts.Practical implicationsBusinesses monitoring the developments of sustainability policies closely, will observe novel trends in technological applications.Social implicationsPolicymakers and researchers may gauge the efficacy of policies against the COVID-19 crisis in the domain of sustainable development and resilience.Originality/valueThis paper provides a cross-analysis of quantitative macroeconomic and quantified policy responses to the 2020 pandemic crisis, linking each indicator to the pillars of sustainability that were relevant for companies between the crucial pandemic outbreak years 2019 and 2020.
引用
收藏
页码:2371 / 2394
页数:24
相关论文
共 84 条
  • [51] Public Policies for Corporate Social Responsibility in Four Nordic Countries: Harmony of Goals and Conflict of Means
    Midttun, Atle
    Gjolberg, Maria
    Kourula, Arno
    Sweet, Susanne
    Vallentin, Steen
    [J]. BUSINESS & SOCIETY, 2015, 54 (04) : 464 - 500
  • [52] Miroshnik Svetlana, 2021, E3S Web of Conferences, V284, DOI 10.1051/e3sconf/202128411015
  • [53] The FDI-CO2nexus from the sustainable development perspective: the case of Azerbaijan
    Mukhtarov, Shahriyar
    Aliyev, Shahriyar
    Mikayilov, Jeyhun, I
    Ismayilov, Altay
    Rzayev, Anar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2021, 28 (03) : 246 - 254
  • [54] Measuring sustainability": A multi-criterion framework"
    Munda G.
    [J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2005, 7 (1) : 117 - 134
  • [55] Nelson J., 2008, CSR and Public Policy: New Forms of Engagement Between Business and Government. Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative
  • [56] OECD, 2021, AR TRAD ENV SUST COM
  • [57] The roles of macro and micro institutions in corporate social responsibility (CSR) Evidence from listed firms in China
    Pan, Xin
    Chen, Xuanjin
    Ning, Lutao
    [J]. MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2018, 56 (05) : 955 - 971
  • [58] Rodríguez XA, 2010, DYNA-COLOMBIA, V77, P11
  • [59] The influence of social responsibility on employee productivity and sales growth: Evidence from certified B corps
    Romi, Andrea
    Cook, Kirsten A.
    Dixon-Fowler, Heather R.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENT AND POLICY JOURNAL, 2018, 9 (04) : 392 - 421
  • [60] Rouse C., 2021, PANDEMICS EFFECT MEA