Optimization of Weight Matrices for the Linear Quadratic Regulator Problem Using Algebraic Closed-Form Solutions

被引:2
作者
Choi, Daegyun [1 ]
Kim, Donghoon [1 ]
Turner, James D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Aerosp Engn & Engn Mech, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
[2] 9399 Wade Blvd, Frisco, TX 75035 USA
关键词
optimalfeedback control; weight matrices; optimization; algebraic closed-form solutions; FEEDBACK-CONTROL; TRACKING CONTROL; LQR; SELECTION;
D O I
10.3390/electronics12214526
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This work proposes an analytical gradient-based optimization approach to determine the optimal weight matrices that make the state and control input at the final time close to zero for the linear quadratic regulator problem. Most existing methodologies focused on regulating the diagonal elements using only bio-inspired approaches or analytical approaches. The method proposed, contrarily, optimizes both diagonal and off-diagonal matrix elements based on the gradient. Moreover, by introducing a new variable composed of the steady-state and time-varying terms for the Riccati matrix and using the coordinate transformation for the state, one develops algebraic equationsbased closed-form solutions to generate the required states and numerical partial derivatives for an optimization strategy that does not require the computationally intensive numerical integration process. The authors test the algorithm with one- and two-degrees-of-freedom linear plant models, and it yields the weight matrices that successfully satisfy the pre-defined requirement, which is the norm of the augmented states less than 10-5. The results suggest the broad applicability of the proposed algorithm in science and engineering.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Bryson A.E., 1975, Applied Optimal Control: Optimization, Estimation, and Control
[2]   Adaptive predator-prey optimization for tuning of infinite horizon LQR applied to vehicle suspension system [J].
Das, Rashmi Ranjan ;
Elumalai, Vinodh Kumar ;
Subramanian, Raaja Ganapathy ;
Kumar, Kadiyam Venkata Ashok .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2018, 72 :518-526
[3]   NUMERICAL-SOLUTION OF X=A1X+XA2+D,X(0)=C [J].
DAVISON, EJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1975, 20 (04) :566-567
[4]  
Dhiman Vishal, 2019, Advances in Interdisciplinary Engineering. Select Proceedings of FLAME 2018. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering (LNME), P595, DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-6577-5_57
[5]   A new algebraic LQR weight selection algorithm for tracking control of 2 DoF torsion system [J].
Kumar Elumalai V. ;
Ganapathy Subramanian R. .
Archives of Electrical Engineering, 2017, 66 (01) :55-75
[6]  
Fahmizal, 2022, 2022 11th Electrical Power, Electronics, Communications, Controls and Informatics Seminar (EECCIS), P270, DOI 10.1109/EECCIS54468.2022.9902888
[7]   HESSENBERG-SCHUR METHOD FOR THE PROBLEM AX+XB=C [J].
GOLUB, GH ;
NASH, S ;
VANLOAN, C .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1979, 24 (06) :909-913
[8]   Modeling and Control of a Double Inverted Pendulum using LQR with Parameter Optimization through GA and PSO [J].
Habib, Maki K. ;
Ayankoso, Samuel A. .
2020 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND EDUCATION IN MECHATRONICS (REM), 2020,
[9]   CLOSED-FORM SOLUTIONS FOR FEEDBACK-CONTROL WITH TERMINAL CONSTRAINTS [J].
JUANG, JN ;
TURNER, JD ;
CHUN, HM .
JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 1985, 8 (01) :39-43
[10]   APSO Based Weighting Matrices Selection of LQR Applied to Tracking Control of SIMO System [J].
Karthick, S. ;
Jerome, Jovitha ;
Kumar, E. Vinodh ;
Raaja, G. .
PROCEEDINGS OF 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMPUTING, NETWORKING AND INFORMATICS (ICACNI 2015), VOL 1, 2016, 43 :11-20