Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of Digital Interventions for Depressive Symptoms in Working Adults: Multiarm Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:4
作者
Taylor, Rachael Wallis [1 ]
Male, Rhian [1 ]
Economides, Marcos [1 ]
Bolton, Heather [1 ]
Cavanagh, Kate [2 ]
机构
[1] Unmind Ltd, 180 Borough High St, London SE1 1LB, England
[2] Univ Sussex, Sussex, England
关键词
depression; digital intervention; randomized controlled trial; RCT; cognitive behavioral therapy; CBT; acceptance and commitment therapy; ACT; behavioral activation; BA; mobile phone; GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER; BEING SCALE WEMWBS; HEALTH; PRODUCTIVITY; VALIDITY; PHQ-9; STANDARDIZATION; ASSOCIATION; VALIDATION; SEVERITY;
D O I
10.2196/41590
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Depressive symptoms are highly prevalent and have broad-ranging negative implications. Digital interventions are increasingly available in the workplace context, but supporting evidence is limited.Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of 3 digital interventions for depressive symptoms in a sample of UK-based working adults experiencing mild to moderate symptoms.Methods: This was a parallel, multiarm, pilot randomized controlled trial. Participants were allocated to 1 of 3 digital interventions or a waitlist control group and had 3 weeks to complete 6 to 8 short self-guided sessions. The 3 interventions are available on the Unmind mental health app for working adults and draw on behavioral activation, cognitive behavioral therapy, and acceptance and commitment therapy. Web-based assessments were conducted at baseline, postintervention (week 3), and at 1-month follow-up (week 7). Participants were recruited via Prolific, a web-based recruitment platform, and the study was conducted entirely on the web. Feasibility and acceptability were assessed using objective engagement data and self-reported feedback. Efficacy outcomes were assessed using validated self-report measures of mental health and functioning and linear mixed models with intention-to-treat principles.Results: In total, 2003 individuals were screened for participation, of which 20.22% (405/2003) were randomized. A total of 92% (373/405) of the participants were retained in the study, 97.4% (295/303) initiated their allocated intervention, and 66.3% (201/303) completed all sessions. Moreover, 80.6% (229/284) of the participants rated the quality of their allocated intervention as excellent or good, and 79.6% (226/284) of the participants were satisfied or very satisfied with their intervention. All active groups showed improvements in well-being, functioning, and depressive and anxiety symptoms compared with the control group, which were maintained at 4 weeks. Hedges g effect sizes for depressive symptoms ranged from -0.53 (95% CI -0.25 to -0.81) to -0.74 (95% CI -0.45 to -1.03).Conclusions: All interventions were feasible and acceptable, and the preliminary efficacy findings indicated that their use may improve depressive symptoms, well-being, and functioning. The predefined criteria for a definitive trial were met.Trial Registration: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) ISRCTN13067492; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN13067492
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, POPULATION ESTIMATES
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Work-related stress, anxiety or depression statistics in Great Britain 2020
[4]   Validation of PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 to Screen for Major Depression in the Primary Care Population [J].
Arroll, Bruce ;
Goodyear-Smith, Felicity ;
Crengle, Susan ;
Gunn, Jane ;
Kerse, Ngaire ;
Fishman, Tana ;
Falloon, Karen ;
Hatcher, Simon .
ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2010, 8 (04) :348-353
[5]   Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) to reduce depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Bai Zhenggang ;
Luo Shiga ;
Zhang Luyao ;
Wu Sijie ;
Iris, Chi .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2020, 260 :728-737
[6]   Smartphones in mental health: a critical review of background issues, current status and future concerns [J].
Bauer, Michael ;
Glenn, Tasha ;
Geddes, John ;
Gitlin, Michael ;
Grof, Paul ;
Kessing, Lars V. ;
Monteith, Scott ;
Faurholt-Jepsen, Maria ;
Severus, Emanuel ;
Whybrow, Peter C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2020, 8 (01)
[7]  
Beck A. T., 1979, Cognitive therapy of depression
[8]   Severity of Depression and Magnitude of Productivity Loss [J].
Beck, Arne ;
Crain, A. Lauren ;
Solberg, Leif I. ;
Unuetzer, Juergen ;
Glasgow, Russell E. ;
Maciosek, Michael V. ;
Whitebird, Robin .
ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2011, 9 (04) :305-311
[9]   Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review [J].
Borghouts, Judith ;
Eikey, Elizabeth ;
Mark, Gloria ;
De Leon, Cinthia ;
Schueller, Stephen M. ;
Schneider, Margaret ;
Stadnick, Nicole ;
Zheng, Kai ;
Mukamel, Dana ;
Sorkin, Dara H. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (03)
[10]   The association of medical conditions and presenteeism [J].
Burton, WN ;
Pransky, G ;
Conti, DJ ;
Chen, CY ;
Edington, DW .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2004, 46 (06) :S38-S45