Strategic horizon of market success: comparing alternative "strategic landscapes" of the new product development process

被引:1
作者
Sameti, Ardalan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales UNSW, Business Sch, Sydney, Australia
关键词
New product development process; Product management; Strategic marketing thinking; Managerial thinking; Design thinking; Market success; Innovation management; DESIGN THINKING; FIRM PERFORMANCE; DECISION-MAKING; OPEN INNOVATION; CREATIVITY; TRUST; MODEL; COLLABORATION; ANTECEDENTS; DIMENSIONS;
D O I
10.1108/JPBM-05-2022-3994
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The success rate of new products is stubbornly low. This paper aims to explore the differences in how product designers and product managers approach the new product development task by comparing their perspectives on the process. Design/methodology/approach - This study conducted a worldwide survey of professional product designers and managers and compared their perspectives. Findings - Managers struggle to understand the problem to be solved until they see the solution in the form of an outstanding product design. Designers struggle to develop new products until they have a specific and insightful understanding of the problem that needs to be solved.Practical implications - Designers' and managers' ways of thinking are different, and effective collaboration depends on them being cognizant of each other's ways of thinking; the success of their work is highly interdependent. Originality/value - To the best of the authors' knowledge, this study is the first study that simultaneously investigates both product designers and managers to reveal the paradoxical dynamics between their perspectives.
引用
收藏
页码:1063 / 1081
页数:19
相关论文
共 112 条
  • [1] Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks
    Ahmed, S
    Wallace, KM
    Blessing, LTM
    [J]. RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2003, 14 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [2] Allen B.J., 2018, J MARKETING, pjm.15.0481
  • [3] Trust and control in changing production environments
    Alpenberg, Jan
    Scarbrough, D. Paul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2018, 88 : 527 - 534
  • [4] Amabile T. M., 2019, Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity, V1st, DOI [10.4324/9780429501234, DOI 10.4324/9780429501234]
  • [5] The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning
    Amabile, Teresa M.
    Pratt, Michael G.
    [J]. RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR: AN ANNUAL SERIES OF ANALYTICAL ESSAYS AND CRITICAL REVIEWS, VOL 36, 2016, 36 : 157 - 183
  • [6] In search of the marketing imagination: Factors affecting the creativity of marketing programs for mature products
    Andrews, J
    Smith, DC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1996, 33 (02) : 174 - 187
  • [7] On making causal claims: A review and recommendations
    Antonakis, John
    Bendahan, Samuel
    Jacquart, Philippe
    Lalive, Rafael
    [J]. LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2010, 21 (06) : 1086 - 1120
  • [8] To Frame or Reframe: Where Might Design Thinking Research Go Next?
    Beckman, Sara L.
    [J]. CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2020, 62 (02) : 144 - 162
  • [9] The design brief as a pivotal tool: A study of Centro Brasil Design's practices to promote design
    Bertao, Renato Antonio
    Brum, Ana Leocadia de Souza
    Joo, Jaewoo
    [J]. DESIGN JOURNAL, 2023, 26 (02) : 188 - 209
  • [10] Resourceful Sensemaking: Overcoming Barriers between Marketing and Design in NPD
    Beverland, Michael B.
    Micheli, Pietro
    Farrelly, Francis J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2016, 33 (05) : 628 - 648