The new grounds for deportation of European Union citizens in the United Kingdom

被引:2
作者
Radziwinowiczowna, Agnieszka [1 ,2 ]
Lewis, Olayinka [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warsaw, Ctr Migrat Res, Warsaw, Poland
[2] Univ Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, England
[3] Univ Essex, Essex Law Sch, Colchester, England
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
EU; MIGRANTS; REMOVAL; BREXIT;
D O I
10.1111/imig.13126
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
Politicians often mention immigration enforcement, and deportation in particular, as a means to assert state sovereignty. This article looks at deportation through exiting the European Union, an event that was interpreted as regaining sovereignty from the supra-national organisation. New immigration regulations in the United Kingdom were meant to end the EU Freedom of Movement and equalise the statuses of EU- and non-EU migrants in the United Kingdom. The research question this article addresses is the following: how do the new immigration regulations and policies affect the possibility of deportations of EU citizens in the United Kingdom? With the lens of Interpretive Policy Analysis, the article analyses primary sources and expert interviews. It concludes that the deportability of EU citizens has increased post-Brexit. It also anticipates that the deportability of EU citizens will be differentiated, as rough sleepers, former convicts and irregular migrants may be first to be targeted with deportation.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 215
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Loved and feared: citizens' ambivalence towards free movement in the European Union [J].
Lutz, Philipp .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2021, 28 (02) :268-288
[42]   UKRAINE IN THE FOREIGN POLICY OF THE UNITED KINGDOM IN THE CONTEXT OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION (1991 - 2019) [J].
Hrubinko, Andrii .
SKHIDNOIEVROPEISKYI ISTORYCHNYI VISNYK-EAST EUROPEAN HISTORICAL BULLETIN, 2020, (14) :153-164
[43]   Brexit and United Kingdom citizens with HIV residing in Spain: a matter of public health [J].
McHale, Jean V. ;
Ramiro Aviles, Miguel A. .
AIDS, 2019, 33 (14) :2257-2259
[44]   What do we know about public attitudes towards experts? Reviewing survey data in the United Kingdom and European Union [J].
Dommett, Katharine ;
Pearce, Warren .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2019, 28 (06) :669-678
[45]   To Brexit or not to Brexit: The roles of Islamophobia, conspiracist beliefs, and integrated threat in voting intentions for the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum [J].
Swami, Viren ;
Barron, David ;
Weis, Laura ;
Furnham, Adrian .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 109 (01) :156-179
[46]   The knowledge behind Brexit. A bibliographic analysis of ex-ante policy appraisals on Brexit in the United Kingdom and the European Union [J].
Pattyn, Valerie ;
Gouglas, Athanassios ;
De Leeuwe, Julianne .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2021, 28 (06) :821-839
[47]   United in Diversity? A Study on the Implementation of Sanctions in the European Union [J].
Giumelli, Francesco ;
Geelhoed, Willem ;
de Vries, Max ;
Molesini, Aurora .
POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE, 2022, 10 (01) :36-46
[48]   A two-tier conception of European Union peoplehood: A realist study of European citizens' bonds of collectivity [J].
Beetz, Jan Pieter .
EUROPEAN LAW JOURNAL, 2017, 23 (06) :467-481
[49]   Human Rights Due Diligence Policies Applied to Extraterritorial Cooperation to Prevent "Irregular" Migration: European Union and United Kingdom Support to Libya [J].
Ferstman, Carla .
GERMAN LAW JOURNAL, 2020, 21 (03) :459-486
[50]   The European Union in the annual United Nations General Assembly Debates [J].
Hosli, Madeleine O. ;
Kantorowicz, Jaroslaw .
CONTEMPORARY POLITICS, 2024,