Defining success in adult obesity management: A systematic review and framework synthesis of clinical practice guidelines

被引:2
作者
Juul-Hindsgaul, Nicole [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Alalwani, Zahra [2 ]
Boylan, Anne-Marie [1 ]
Hartmann-Boyce, Jamie [1 ]
Nunan, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Ctr Evidence Based Med, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Continuing Educ, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Ctr Evidence Based Med, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Radcliffe Primary Care Bldg,Woodstock Rd, Oxford OX2 6GG, England
关键词
clinical practice guidelines; obesity management; success; systematic review; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; OVERWEIGHT; CARE; ASSOCIATION;
D O I
10.1111/cob.12631
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Obesity is a chronic and complex disease affecting millions of people worldwide. Currently, there is no standard definition of success for the management of obesity. We set out to complete a synthesis of clinical practice guidelines for obesity management for adult populations, aiming to provide both a quantitative descriptive and qualitative analysis of definitions of success in clinical practice guidelines. An electronic search retrieved 4477 references. Sixteen clinical practice guidelines were included after screening and full-text review. We coded definitions of success 147 times across the included guidelines. No standard or explicit definition of success was identified in the guidelines but rather success was implicitly defined. We developed three themes describing how success was defined in the clinical practice guidelines: Knowledge-based decision making; management of expectations; and the perception of control. The review reinforced that success is an inherently subjective and complex concept. Defining success is limited by existing studies that focus on weight loss and would benefit from additional research on different outcomes. Equally, the relationship between people living with obesity and their clinicians should be further explored to understand how defining success is controlled, discussed and framed in a clinical setting.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] The Saudi clinical practice guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults
    Alfadda, Assim A.
    Al-Dhwayan, Madhawi M.
    Alharbi, Abdulhameed A.
    Al Khudhair, Basema K.
    Al Nozha, Omar M.
    Al-Qahtani, Nawal M.
    Alzahrani, Saad H.
    Bardisi, Wedad M.
    Sallam, Reem M.
    Riva, John J.
    Brozek, Jan L.
    Schunemann, Holger J.
    Moore, Ainsley
    [J]. SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 37 (10) : 1151 - 1162
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, Endocr Pract, V22, P1
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2004, Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Obesity
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2013, CLIN PRACT GUID MAN
  • [5] Classification of obesity and assessment of obesity-related health risks
    Aronne, LJ
    [J]. OBESITY RESEARCH, 2002, 10 : 105S - 115S
  • [6] Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review
    Barnett-Page, Elaine
    Thomas, James
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2009, 9
  • [7] The Look AHEAD study: a missed opportunity
    Bennett, Peter H.
    [J]. LANCET DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2014, 2 (10) : 775 - 776
  • [8] Board HP, 2016, WHAT IS DEEP TIME
  • [9] One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) : 328 - 352
  • [10] The Science of Obesity Management: An Endocrine Society Scientific Statement
    Bray, George A.
    Heisel, William E.
    Afshin, Ashkan
    Jensen, Michael D.
    Dietz, William H.
    Long, Michael
    Kushner, Robert F.
    Daniels, Stephen R.
    Wadden, Thomas A.
    Tsai, Adam G.
    Hu, Frank B.
    Jakicic, John M.
    Ryan, Donna H.
    Wolfe, Bruce M.
    Inge, Thomas H.
    [J]. ENDOCRINE REVIEWS, 2018, 39 (02) : 79 - 132