Selection of the final solid waste disposal site in the Bolgatanga municipality of Ghana using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and multi-criteria evaluation (MCE)

被引:9
作者
Ampofo, Steve [1 ]
Issifu, Joan Sana [1 ]
Kusibu, Michael Mba [1 ]
Mohammed, Asaah Sumaila [1 ]
Adiali, Freda [1 ]
机构
[1] CK Tedam Univ Technol & Appl Sci CKT UTAS, Sch Environm & Life Sci SELS, Dept Environm Sci, POB 24, Navrongo, Ghana
关键词
Landfill; Multi-criteria evaluation (MCE); Municipal solid waste (MSW); Bolgatanga; Analytical hierarchy process (AHP); SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA; LANDFILL; MANAGEMENT; RISK; GIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18558
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The various components of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) such as collection, sorting, transportation, and disposal have their peculiarities and challenges. However, final disposal sites, generally referred to as landfill sites, present a complex difficulty. The aggregation of the problems of other components has consequences on the microenvironment, public health, and groundwater. Final disposal of MSW, site selection, and management presents an enormous burden for most Metropolitan, Municipal, and District Assembly (s) in Ghana. The case of Bolgatanga Municipality is similar to many others in the Upper East region in particular and Ghana as a whole. The existing landfill site is improperly sited and poses a great danger to adjoining communities. In this work, we used the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in a G.I.S. suite and Multi-Criteria Evaluation to assess the current location and select a possible new site within the municipality. The criteria used are generally environmental and socio-economic parameters, including; distance from major roads, rivers, settlements, and the selection of an appropriate slope and soil type that suits the guidelines for the siting of a landfill. The outcome of this multicriteria assessment is the selection of a new site far from the current disposal site indicating the inappropriate location of the current site. A combination of all weighted criteria through a model builder process produced a suitability index map for candidate landfill sites. The selected site at Sherigu is about 16 km by road from the proposed site, which is much bigger than the threshold of 500 sq. meters. The separation distance and size between the current and the proposed site are indications of how economically and environmentally inappropriate the Sherigu site is and the need for a better site that is better situated for socio-economic and environmental considerations.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Aboziah R.A., 2016, GHANA, V93, DOI [10.1038/tp.2015.49, DOI 10.1038/TP.2015.49]
[2]   Environmental impact and health risk assessment of potentially toxic metals emanating from different anthropogenic activities related to E-wastes [J].
Adenuga, Adeniyi Abiodun ;
Amos, Olufemi David ;
Olajide, Oluwatobi Deborah ;
Eludoyin, Adebayo Oluwole ;
Idowu, Oluwatope Olaniyi .
HELIYON, 2022, 8 (08)
[3]  
Akurugu E., 2018, SCI J APPL MATH STAT, V6, P99, DOI DOI 10.11648/J.SJAMS.20180603.15
[4]  
Al-Hanbali A., 2011, Journal of Geographic Information System, V3, P267, DOI 10.4236/jgis.2011.34023
[5]   Sanitary landfill site selection by integrating AHP and FTOPSIS with GIS: a case study of Memari Municipality, India [J].
Ali, Sk Ajim ;
Parvin, Farhana ;
Al-Ansari, Nadhir ;
Quoc Bao Pham ;
Ahmad, Ateeque ;
Raj, Meena Sansar ;
Duong Tran Anh ;
Le Huy Ba ;
Van Nam Thai .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (06) :7528-7550
[6]   Suitability analysis for municipal landfill site selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and geospatial technique [J].
Ali, Sk Ajim ;
Ahmad, Ateeque .
ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2020, 79 (10)
[7]  
Ampofo S., 2022, J WASTES BIOMANAG JW, DOI [10.26480/jwbm.02.2022.60.68, DOI 10.26480/JWBM.02.2022.60.68]
[8]  
Ampofo S., 2015, ENVIRON POLLUT, V4, DOI [10.5539/ep.v4n3p27, DOI 10.5539/EP.V4N3P27]
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Clin Toxicol (Phila), V56, P802, DOI [10.1080/00107514.2018.1494937, 10.1080/10408444.2018.1522751, 10.1080/10520295.2018.1500737, 10.1080/21678421.2018.1464641, 10.1080/15563650.2018.1486625, 10.1080/17476348.2018.1452888, 10.1080/13625187.2018.1491176, 10.1080/14992027.2018.1470739, 10.1080/13543776.2018.1502972, 10.1080/14992027.2018.1488786, 10.1080/09637486.2018.1492364, 10.1080/09546634.2018.1483059, 10.1080/15548627.2018.1479052, 10.1080/14737140.2018.1426139, 10.1080/
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2014, International Journal of Pure & Applied Bioscience