"It's not a one operation fits all": A qualitative study exploring fee setting and participation in price transparency initiatives amongst medical specialists in the Australian private healthcare sector

被引:3
作者
Sabanovic, Hana [1 ,3 ]
La Brooy, Camille [1 ]
Mendez, Susan J.
Yong, Jongsay [2 ]
Scott, Anthony [2 ]
Elshaug, Adam G. [1 ]
Prang, Khic-Houy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Hlth Policy, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Inst Appl Econ & Social Res, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Level 4,207 Bouverie St, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
Price transparency; Out-of-pocket costs; Specialist fees; Private health insurance; Behavior change; Australia; PHYSICIAN FEES; COMPETITION; MARKET;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116353
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The Australian government, through Medicare, defines the type of medical specialist services it covers and subsidizes, but it does not regulate prices. Specialists in private practice can charge more than the fee listed by Medicare depending on what they feel 'the market will bear'. This can sometimes result in high and unexpected out-of-pocket (OOP) payments for patients. To reduce pricing uncertainty and 'bill shock' faced by consumers, the government introduced a price transparency website in December 2019. It is not clear how effective such a website will be and whether specialists and patients will use it. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore factors influencing how specialists set their fees, and their views on and participation in price transparency initiatives. We conducted 27 semi -structured interviews with surgical specialists. We analysed the data using thematic analysis and responses were mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behavior model. We identified several patient, specialist and system -level factors influencing fee setting. Patient -level factors included patient characteristics, circumstance, complexity, and assumptions regarding perceived value of care. Specialist -level factors included perceived experience and skills, ethical considerations, and gendered-behavior. System -level factors included the Australian Medical Association recommended price list, practice costs, and supply and demand factors including perceived competition and practice location. Specialists were opposed to price transparency websites and lacked motivation to participate because of the complexity of fee setting, concerns over unintended consequences, and feelings of frustration they were being singled out. If price transparency websites are to be pursued, specialists' lack of motivation to participate needs to be addressed.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems
    Atkins, Lou
    Francis, Jill
    Islam, Rafat
    O'Connor, Denise
    Patey, Andrea
    Ivers, Noah
    Foy, Robbie
    Duncan, Eilidh M.
    Colquhoun, Heather
    Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
    Lawton, Rebecca
    Michie, Susan
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2017, 12
  • [2] Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists, 2023, ANZCA and FPM CPD Program Handbook
  • [3] Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2021, Patient Experiences Survey
  • [4] Australian Competition & Consumer Commission, 2010, Medical Professionals
  • [5] Australian Governement Department of Health and Aged Care, 2019, Medical Costs Finder
  • [6] Australian Governement Department of Health and Aged Care, 2023, Drop-in Session about the Enhanced Medical Cost Finder
  • [7] Australian Government Department of Health, Ministerial advisory committee on out-ofpocket costsreport, P5
  • [8] Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care, 2022, Medical Costs Finder disclaimer
  • [9] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2018, PAT OUT OF POCK SPEN
  • [10] Australian Medical Association, 2022, Guide for Patients on How the Health Care System Funds Medical Care