Quantifying the effects of food management routines on household food waste

被引:23
作者
Ananda, Jayanath [1 ]
Karunasena, Gamithri Gayana [2 ,3 ]
Kansal, Monika [1 ]
Mitsis, Ann [1 ]
Pearson, David [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] CQ Univ, Sch Business & Law, 120, Spencer St, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
[2] Fight Food Waste CRC, Wine Innovat Cent Bldg,Level 1,Waite Campus, Urrbrae, SA 5064, Australia
[3] CQ Univ, Sch Business, 400 Kent St, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
关键词
Household routines; Path analysis; Food waste; Grocery planning; PLS-SEM; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; EXTENDED THEORY; CONSUMER; LEVEL; DETERMINANTS; GENERATION; MOTIVATION; REDUCTION; ATTITUDES; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136230
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper is to explore the impact of household food management routines on the amount of food waste. We build on past studies, many of which have used the theory of planned behavior to explain food waste, by incorporating actual food waste. The repetitive and routinised nature of diverse food management routines in the household leads to formation of habits, many of which play a major role in determining the amount of food waste. Using a large national level dataset (n = 4324), this paper applies a Partial Least Square - Structural Equation Modelling framework to quantify the influence of food management routines on household food waste. Findings indicate that motivation and norms have a positive and statistically significant (at 1% level) influence on food planning behaviours which in turn contribute to reducing food waste. They also positively influence food storing behaviours. These results are useful for improving effectiveness of household food waste prevention interventions. The impact from highlighting social norms (such as saving planet, easing guilt, and doing the right thing) and motivation (such as saving time, money and educating children) will be enhanced when supported by complementary food management routines in the areas of planning (meal schedule and check stocks before shopping) and storing (extending product life by efficient storage in containers and/or fridge and freezer).
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]   Food waste behaviour at the household level: A conceptual framework [J].
Abdelradi, Fadi .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2018, 71 :485-493
[2]   Assessment of food waste generation and composition among Korean households using novel sampling and statistical approaches [J].
Adelodun, Bashir ;
Kim, Sang Hyun ;
Choi, Kyung-Sook .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 122 :71-80
[3]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[4]   Has the COVID-19 pandemic changed food waste perception and behavior? Evidence from Italian consumers [J].
Amicarelli, Vera ;
Lagioia, Giovanni ;
Sampietro, Stefania ;
Bux, Christian .
SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 2022, 82
[5]   Households' Food Waste Behavior at Local Scale: A Cluster Analysis after the COVID-19 Lockdown [J].
Amicarelli, Vera ;
Tricase, Caterina ;
Spada, Alessia ;
Bux, Christian .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (06)
[6]   Analysing behavioural and socio-demographic factors and practices influencing Australian household food waste [J].
Ananda, Jayanath ;
Karunasena, Gamithri Gayana ;
Mitsis, Ann ;
Kansal, Monika ;
Pearson, David .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 306
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2015, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203
[8]   Predicting intentions to purchase organic food:: The role of affective and moral attitudes in the Theory of Planned Behaviour [J].
Arvola, A. ;
Vassallo, M. ;
Dean, M. ;
Lampila, P. ;
Saba, A. ;
Lahteenmaki, L. ;
Shepherd, R. .
APPETITE, 2008, 50 (2-3) :443-454
[9]   Consumer-Related Food Waste: Causes and Potential for Action [J].
Aschemann-Witzel, Jessica ;
de Hooge, Ilona ;
Amani, Pegah ;
Bech-Larsen, Tino ;
Oostindjer, Marije .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 7 (06) :6457-6477
[10]   Drivers of food waste reduction behaviour in the household context [J].
Attiq, Saman ;
Habib, Muhammad Danish ;
Kaur, Puneet ;
Hasni, Muhammad Junaid Shahid ;
Dhir, Amandeep .
FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2021, 94