Miscommunication about the US federal Tobacco 21 law: a content analysis of Twitter discussions

被引:7
作者
Dobbs, Page D. [1 ]
Schisler, Eric [1 ]
Colditz, Jason B. [2 ]
Primack, Brian A. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas, Hlth Human Performance & Recreat, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Inst Clin Res Educ, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Univ Arkansas, Coll Educ & Hlth Profess, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
[4] Oregona State Univ, Coll Publ Hlth & Human Sci, Corvallis, OR USA
关键词
end game; public policy; social marketing; USE-PURCHASE LAWS; POSSESSION; SALES; CIGARETTE; POLICIES; AGE;
D O I
10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-057099
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective Tobacco 21 is a law that sets the minimum legal sales age of tobacco products to 21. On 20 December 2019, the USA passed a federal Tobacco 21 law. The objective of this study is to explore Twitter discussions about the federal Tobacco 21 law in the USA leading up to enacted. Methods Twitter messages about Tobacco 21 posted between September and December 2019 were collected via RITHM software. A 2% sample of all collected tweets were double coded by independent coders using a content analysis approach. Results Findings included three content categories of tweets (news, youth and young adults and methods of avoiding the law) with eight subcodes. Most news tweets incorrectly described the law as a purchase law (54.7%). However, Tobacco 21 is in fact a sales law-it only includes penalties for tobacco retailers who sell to under-age purchasers. About one-fourth (27%) of the tweets involved youth and young adults, with some claiming the law would reduce youth smoking and others doubting its ability to limit youth access to tobacco products. Few tweets (2.5%) mentioned methods of circumventing the policy, such as having an older peer purchase tobacco. Conclusions As several countries explore raising their age of sale of tobacco laws to 21, they should couple policy enactment with clear and accurate communication about the law. Compliance agencies at all levels (eg, local, regional, national) can use social media to identify policy loopholes and support vulnerable populations throughout the policy implementation process.
引用
收藏
页码:696 / 700
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Tobacco 21 policies in California and Hawaii and sales of cigarette packs: a difference-in-differences analysis [J].
Ali, Fatma Romeh M. ;
Rice, Ketra ;
Fang, Xin ;
Xu, Xin .
TOBACCO CONTROL, 2020, 29 (05) :588-592
[2]   When a ban really is not a ban: internet loopholes and Djarum flavoured cigarettes in the USA [J].
Allem, Jon-Patrick ;
Ayers, John W. ;
Althouse, Benjamin M. ;
Williams, Rebecca .
TOBACCO CONTROL, 2016, 25 (04) :489-490
[3]   "It's really addictive and I'm trapped:" A qualitative analysis of the reasons for quitting vaping among treatment-seeking young people [J].
Amato, Michael S. ;
Bottcher, Mia M. ;
Cha, Sarah ;
Jacobs, Megan A. ;
Pearson, Jennifer L. ;
Graham, Amanda L. .
ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2021, 112
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, TEENS SOCIAL MEDIA T
[5]   Qualitative research: deductive and inductive approaches to data analysis [J].
Azungah, Theophilus .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2018, 18 (04) :383-400
[6]  
Baird MF, 2017, CULTURAL HERITAGE ST, P1, DOI 10.4018/978-1-5225-0660-7.ch001
[7]  
Bonnie R.J., 2015, Committee on the public health implications of raising the minimum age for purchasing tobacco products
[8]  
board on population health and public health practice
[9]   Evidence of Nicotine Dependence in Adolescents Who Use Juul and Similar Pod Devices [J].
Boykan, Rachel ;
Goniewicz, Maciej L. ;
Messina, Catherine R. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (12)
[10]   JUUL: Spreading Online and Offline [J].
Chu, Kar-Hai ;
Colditz, Jason B. ;
Primack, Brian A. ;
Shensa, Ariel ;
Allem, Jon-Patrick ;
Miller, Elizabeth ;
Unger, Jennifer B. ;
Cruz, Tess Boley .
JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2018, 63 (05) :582-586