Cross-Situational Word Learning in Children and Adults: The Case of Lexical Overlap

被引:5
作者
Benitez, Viridiana L. [1 ]
Li, Ye [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Dept Psychol, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
关键词
MUTUAL EXCLUSIVITY; YOUNG-CHILDREN; ONE LANGUAGE; INFANTS; REFERENT; MEMORY; EXPERIENCE; MEANINGS; INPUT; ACQUISITION;
D O I
10.1080/15475441.2023.2256713
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Cross-situational word learning, the ability to decipher word-referent links over multiple ambiguous learning events, has been documented across development and proposed to be key to vocabulary acquisition. However, this work has largely focused on learning from one-to-one structure, where each referent is consistently linked with a single label. In contrast, learners can encounter lexical overlap, such as when learning synonyms, which requires learning from structure that presents multiple labels linked with the same thing (many-to-one structure). Are children capable of cross-situational word learning from encounters presenting consistent lexical overlap? How does this ability change with age? Here, we provide a first test of cross-situational word learning from input presenting lexical overlap across age by testing 4- to 7-year-old children (N = 190) and adults (N = 80) on their ability to learn from one-to-one or two-to-one structure. Results showed that adults (Experiment 1) were successful at learning from both types of structure, with an advantage for one-to-one structure. Children (Experiment 2) performed less well than adults overall, and failed to learn from two-to-one structure. With extended training (Experiment 3), older children were successful at learning from two-to-one structure while younger children were not. These results provide the first evidence that cross-situational word learning from one-to-one and two-to-one structure improves over age.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 218
页数:24
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]  
Akhtar N., 1999, First Language, V19, P347, DOI DOI 10.1177/014272379901905703
[2]   Cross-situational statistically based word learning intervention for late-talking toddlers [J].
Alt, Mary ;
Meyers, Christina ;
Oglivie, Trianna ;
Nicholas, Katrina ;
Arizmendi, Genesis .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2014, 52 :207-220
[3]   Fast mapping word meanings across trials: Young children forget all but their first guess [J].
Aravind, Athulya ;
de Villiers, Jill ;
Pace, Amy ;
Valentine, Hannah ;
Golinkoff, Roberta ;
Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy ;
Iglesias, Aquiles ;
Wilson, Mary Sweig .
COGNITION, 2018, 177 :177-188
[4]   THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL EXCLUSIVITY IN WORD LEARNING - TO HONOR OR NOT TO HONOR [J].
AU, TKF ;
GLUSMAN, M .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1990, 61 (05) :1474-1490
[5]   Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal [J].
Barr, Dale J. ;
Levy, Roger ;
Scheepers, Christoph ;
Tily, Harry J. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2013, 68 (03) :255-278
[6]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[7]   The temporal structure of naming events differentially affects children's and adults' cross-situational word learning [J].
Benitez, Viridiana L. ;
Zettersten, Martin ;
Wojcik, Erica .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 200
[8]   Statistical learning of multiple speech streams: A challenge for monolingual infants [J].
Benitez, Viridiana L. ;
Bulgarelli, Federica ;
Byers-Heinlein, Krista ;
Saffran, Jenny R. ;
Weiss, Daniel J. .
DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2020, 23 (02)
[9]   Competition between multiple words for a referent in cross-situational word learning [J].
Benitez, Viridiana L. ;
Yurovsky, Daniel ;
Smith, Linda B. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2016, 90 :31-48
[10]   Cross-Situational Learning Is Supported by Propose-but-Verify Hypothesis Testing [J].
Berens, Sam C. ;
Horst, Jessica S. ;
Bird, Chris M. .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (07) :1132-+