Compared with conventional insemination, intracytoplasmic sperm injection provides no benefit in cases of nonmale factor infertility as evidenced by comparable euploidy rate

被引:11
作者
Patel, Karishma [1 ,6 ]
Vaughan, Denis A. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Rodday, Angie Mae [5 ]
Penzias, Alan [2 ,3 ]
Sakkas, Denny [2 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Boston, MA USA
[2] Boston IVF Eugin Grp, Waltham, MA USA
[3] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Boston, MA USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Biol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Tufts Clin & Translat Sci Inst, Boston, MA USA
[6] Tufts Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 800 Washington St 22, Boston, MA 02111 USA
关键词
Conventional insemination; ICSI; PGT-A; euploidy rate; nonmale factor infertility; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; CHROMOSOMAL-ABNORMALITIES; OUTCOMES; ICSI; ANEUPLOIDY; SELECTION; EMBRYOS; COUPLES;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.04.020
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate whether differences in euploidy rates exist between intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and conventional insemination (CI) in nonmale factor infertility cases. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: A single, academically affiliated infertility center in the United States. Patients: A total of 3554 patients who underwent in vitro fertilization cycles from January 2014 to December 2021. All cycles that had preimplantation testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) performed by trophectoderm biopsy and had a postpreparation sperm concentration >4 million total motile sperm per milliliter were included. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was the embryo euploidy rate per embryo biopsied in the ICSI vs. CI group. Secondary outcomes included the fertilization rate and number of embryos biopsied. Generalized estimating equations with a Poisson distribution were used to estimate the euploid rate ratio (with total embryos biopsied as an offset), while accounting for multiple retrievals per patient. To adjust for confounding, a propensity score model was fit for ICSI using 14 baseline female and male characteristics. Results: Oocytes retrieved and the number of embryos biopsied were similar in both groups, while the fertilization rate per oocyte retrieved was significantly lower with ICSI (0.64 vs. 0.66). The proportion of euploid embryos in the ICSI group was significantly lower when compared with CI (0.47 vs. 0.52), with a euploid rate ratio of 0.89. Interestingly, when accounting for the variation in PGT reference laboratories over the study time period, adjusting for the date of procedure did not change the relationship between ICSI and euploid rate (rate ratio = 0.89); however, after adjusting for the PGT reference laboratory, the relationship between ICSI and euploid rate was no longer significant (rate ratio = 0.97). Conclusions: In the setting of nonmale factor infertility, ICSI resulted in a lower fertilization rate and an 11% lower embryo euploid rate compared with CI. Although the data are not statistically significant when adjusted for the PGT reference laboratory, we still can conclude that ICSI does not provide any benefit. These data support the recommendation that CI should be the preferred methodology for fertilization in nonmale factor infertility cases. (c) 2023 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 286
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
[11]   Elevated sperm chromosome aneuploidy and apoptosis in patients with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss [J].
Carrell, DT ;
Wilcox, AL ;
Lowy, L ;
Peterson, CM ;
Jones, KP ;
Erickson, L ;
Campbell, B ;
Branch, DW ;
Hatasaka, HH .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 101 (06) :1229-1235
[12]   Implication of sperm chromosomal abnormalities in recurrent abortion and multiple implantation failure [J].
Caseiro, Ana Lara ;
Regalo, Ana ;
Pereira, Elisa ;
Esteves, Telma ;
Fernandes, Fernando ;
Carvalho, Joaquim .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2015, 31 (04) :481-485
[13]   Can Comprehensive Chromosome Screening Technology Improve IVF/ICSI Outcomes? A Meta-Analysis [J].
Chen, Minghao ;
Wei, Shiyou ;
Hu, Junyan ;
Quan, Song .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (10)
[14]   Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (abnormal number of chromosomes) in in vitro fertilisation [J].
Cornelisse, Simone ;
Zagers, Miriam ;
Kostova, Elena ;
Fleischer, Kathrin ;
van Wely, Madelon ;
Mastenbroek, Sebastiaan .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, (09)
[15]   Does intracytoplasmic sperm injection improve live birth rate when compared with conventional in vitro fertilization in non-male factor infertility? A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
de Bantel-Finet, Astrid ;
Arbo, Elisangela ;
Colombani, Marina ;
Darne, Bernadette ;
Gallot, Vanessa ;
Grzegorczyk-Martin, Veronika ;
Languille, Solene ;
Freour, Thomas .
F&S REVIEWS, 2022, 3 (01) :57-68
[16]   Comparison of in-vitro development of embryos originating from either conventional in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection [J].
Dumoulin, JCM ;
Coonen, E ;
Bras, M ;
van Wissen, LCP ;
Ignoul-Vanvuchelen, R ;
Bergers-Jansen, JM ;
Derhaag, JG ;
Geraedts, JPM ;
Evers, JLH .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2000, 15 (02) :402-409
[17]  
Eftekhar M, 2012, IRAN J REPROD MED, V10, P131
[18]   The effect of rapid and delayed insemination on reproductive outcome in conventional insemination and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in vitro fertilization cycles [J].
Esiso, Fredrick M. ;
Cunningham, Donna ;
Lai, FangFang ;
Garcia, Desiree ;
Barrett, C. Brent ;
Thornton, Kim ;
Sakkas, Denny .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2021, 38 (10) :2697-2706
[19]   Intracytoplasmic sperm injection for male infertility and consequences for offspring [J].
Esteves, Sandro C. ;
Roque, Matheus ;
Bedoschi, Giuliano ;
Haahr, Thor ;
Humaidan, Peter .
NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2018, 15 (09) :535-562
[20]   Should ICSI be the treatment of choice for all cases of in-vitro conception? [J].
Fishel, S ;
Aslam, I ;
Lisi, F ;
Rinaldi, L ;
Timson, J ;
Jacobson, M ;
Gobetz, L ;
Green, S ;
Campbell, A ;
Lisi, R .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2000, 15 (06) :1278-1283