Spinal Deformity Complexity Checklist for Minimally Invasive Surgery: Expert Consensus from the Minimally Invasive International Spine Study Group

被引:0
|
作者
Anand, Neel [1 ]
Mummaneni, Praveen, V [2 ]
Uribe, Juan S. [3 ]
Turner, Jay [3 ]
Than, Khoi D. [4 ]
Chou, Dean [2 ]
Nunley, Pierce D. [5 ]
Wang, Michael Y. [6 ]
Fessler, Richard G. [7 ]
Le, Vivian [2 ]
Robinson, Jerry [1 ]
Walker, Corey [1 ]
Kahwaty, Sheila [1 ]
Khanderhoo, Babak [1 ]
Eastlack, Robert K. [8 ]
Okonkwo, David O. [9 ]
Kanter, Adam S. [9 ]
Fu, Kai-Ming G. [10 ]
Mundis Jr, Gregory M. [8 ]
Passias, Peter [11 ]
Park, Paul [12 ,13 ]
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Neurosurg, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Barrow Neurol Inst, Phoenix, AZ USA
[4] Duke Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Neurosurg, Durham, NC USA
[5] Spine Inst Louisiana, Shreveport, LA USA
[6] Univ Miami, Dept Neurosurg, Miami, FL USA
[7] Rush Univ, Dept Neurol Surg, Med Ctr, Chicago, IL USA
[8] Scripps Clin, Dept Orthopaed Surg, La Jolla, CA USA
[9] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Neurosurg, Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[10] Cornell Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, New York, NY USA
[11] NYU, New York Spine Inst, Dept Orthopaed & Neurol Surg, Div Spinal Surg,Sch Med, New York, NY USA
[12] Semmes Murphey Neurol & Spine Inst, Memphis, TN 38120 USA
[13] Univ Tennessee, Dept Neurosurg, Hlth Sci Ctr, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
关键词
Adult spinal deformity; Checklist; Minimally invasive surgery; Spinal surgery; Surgical approach; FUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2023.02.082
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: We developed a spinal deformity complexity checklist (SDCC) to assess the difficulty in performing a circumferential minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for adult spinal deformity. -METHODS: A modified Delphi method of panel experts was used to construct an SDCC checklist of radiographic and patient-related characteristics that could affect the complexity of surgery via MIS approaches. Ten surgeons with expertise in MIS deformity surgery were queried to develop and refine the SDCC with 3 radiographic cate-gories (x-ray, magnetic resonance imaging, computed to-mography) and 1 patient-related category. Within each category, characteristics affecting MIS complexity were identified by initial roundtable discussion. Second-round discussion determined which characteristics substan-tially impacted complexity the most. -RESULTS: Thirteen characteristics within the x-ray category were determined. Spinopelvic characteristics, endpoints of instrumentation, and prior hardware/fusion were associated with increased complexity. Vertebral body rotation-as reflected by the Nash-Moe grade-added significant complexity. Psoas anatomy and spinal stenosis added the most complexity for the 5 magnetic resonance imaging characteristics. There were 3 characteristics in the CT category with pre-exisiting fusion, being the vari-able most highly selected. Of the 5 patient-related char-acteristics, osteoporosis and BMI were found to most affect complexity.CONCLUSIONS: The SDCC is a comprehensive list of pertinent radiographic and patient-related characteristics affecting complexity level for MIS deformity surgery. The value of the SDCC is that it allows rapid assessment of key factors when determining whether MIS surgery can be performed effectively and safely. Patients with scores of 4 in any characteristic should be considered chal-lenging to treat with MIS; open surgery may be a better alternative.
引用
收藏
页码:E472 / E477
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] When Would Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Not Be Preferable for Metastatic Spine Disease?
    Hui, Si jian
    Tan, Jiong hao
    Athia, Sahil
    Kumar, Priyambada
    Lee, Renick
    Ali, Shahid
    Kim, Seok woo
    Kumar, Naresh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2024, 18 (06) : 738 - 744
  • [22] Minimally invasive spinal surgery and spinal stenosis Response
    Haertl, Roger
    Alimi, Marjan
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2015, 22 (04) : 338 - 338
  • [23] Minimally invasive spinal surgery in spinal infections - A review
    Kelly, Adrian
    Younus, Aftab
    INTERDISCIPLINARY NEUROSURGERY-ADVANCED TECHNIQUES AND CASE MANAGEMENT, 2020, 21
  • [24] Augmented reality for minimally invasive spinal surgery
    Avrumova, Fedan
    Lebl, Darren R.
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2023, 9
  • [25] Minimally invasive surgery for thoracolumbar spinal trauma
    Walker, Corey T.
    Xu, David S.
    Godzik, Jakub
    Turner, Jay D.
    Uribe, Juan S.
    Smith, William D.
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2018, 6 (06)
  • [26] The Current State of Minimally Invasive Approaches to Adult Spinal Deformity
    Lovecchio, Francis
    Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
    CURRENT REVIEWS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL MEDICINE, 2019, 12 (03) : 318 - 327
  • [27] A Review of Minimally Invasive Procedures for the Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity
    Kanter, Adam S.
    Tempel, Zachary J.
    Ozpinar, Alp
    Okonkwo, David O.
    SPINE, 2016, 41 (08) : S59 - S65
  • [28] The Current State of Minimally Invasive Approaches to Adult Spinal Deformity
    Francis Lovecchio
    Sheeraz A. Qureshi
    Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2019, 12 : 318 - 327
  • [29] A C-Arm-Free Minimally Invasive Technique for Spinal Surgery: Cervical and Thoracic Spine
    Tanaka, Masato
    Zygogiannnis, Konstantinos
    Sake, Naveen
    Arataki, Shinya
    Fujiwara, Yoshihiro
    Taoka, Takuya
    Modesto, Thiago Henrique de Moraes
    Chatzikomninos, Ioannis
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2023, 59 (10):
  • [30] Are Minimally Invasive Spine Surgeons or Classical Open Spine Surgeons More Consistent with Their Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity?
    Uribe, Juan S.
    Koffie, Robert M.
    Wang, Michael Y.
    Mundis, Gregory M.
    Kanter, Adam S.
    Eastlack, Robert K.
    Anand, Neel
    Park, Paul
    Smith, Justin S.
    Burton, Douglas C.
    Chou, Dean
    Kelly, Michael P.
    Kim, Han Jo
    Bess, Shay
    Shaffrey, Christopher, I
    Schwab, Frank J.
    Lenke, Lawrence G.
    Mummaneni, Praveen, V
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 165 : E51 - E58