Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:7
作者
Majdi, Alireza [1 ]
Deng, Zhengdao [2 ]
Sadigh-Eteghad, Saeed [3 ]
De Vloo, Philippe [2 ,4 ]
Nuttin, Bart [2 ,4 ]
Mc Laughlin, Myles [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Leuven Brain Inst, Dept Neurosci, Exp ORL, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Leuven Brain Inst, Res Grp Expt Neurosurg & Neuroanat, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Neurosci Res Ctr, Tabriz, Iran
[4] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Neurosurg, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
meta-analysis; systematic review; Alzheimer's disease; deep brain stimulation; cognition; NUCLEUS BASALIS; FOLLOW-UP; MEYNERT; FORNIX; TRIAL; PROGRESSION; DEMENTIA; RISK; TAU;
D O I
10.3389/fnins.2023.1154180
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background: One of the experimental neuromodulation techniques being researched for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is deep brain stimulation (DBS). To evaluate the effectiveness of DBS in AD, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available evidence. Methods: From the inception through December 2021, the following databases were searched: Medline via PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The search phrases used were "Alzheimer's disease," "AD," "deep brain stimulation," and "DBS." The information from the included articles was gathered using a standardized data-collecting form. In the included papers, the Cochrane Collaboration methodology was used to evaluate the risk of bias. A fixed-effects model was used to conduct the meta-analysis. Results: Only five distinct publications and 6 different comparisons (one study consisted of two phases) were included out of the initial 524 papers that were recruited. DBS had no impact on the cognitive ability in patients with AD [0.116 SMD, 95% confidence interval (CI), -0.236 to 0.469, p = 0.518]. The studies' overall heterogeneity was not significant (kappa(2) = 6.23, T-2 = 0.053, df = 5, I-2 = 19.76%, p = 0.284). According to subgroup analysis, the fornix-DBS did not improve cognitive function in patients with AD (0.145 SMD, 95%CI, -0.246 to 0.537, p = 0.467). Unfavorable neurological and non-neurological outcomes were also reported. Conclusion: The inconsistencies and heterogeneity of the included publications in various target and age groups of a small number of AD patients were brought to light by this meta-analysis. To determine if DBS is useful in the treatment of AD, further studies with larger sample sizes and randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled designs are required.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Synaptic activity protects against AD and FTD-like pathology via autophagic-lysosomal degradation
    Akwa, Y.
    Gondard, E.
    Mann, A.
    Capetillo-Zarate, E.
    Alberdi, E.
    Matute, C.
    Marty, S.
    Vaccari, T.
    Lozano, A. M.
    Baulieu, E. E.
    Tampellini, D.
    [J]. MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 23 (06) : 1530 - 1540
  • [2] Aldehri Majed, 2018, Surg Neurol Int, V9, P58, DOI 10.4103/sni.sni_342_17
  • [3] Neuroanatomical Characteristics Associated With Response to Deep Brain Stimulation of the Nucleus Basalis of Meynert for Alzheimer's Disease
    Baldermann, Juan Carlos
    Hardenacke, Katja
    Hu, Xiaochen
    Koester, Phillip
    Horn, Andreas
    Freund, Hans-Joachim
    Zilles, Karl
    Sturm, Volker
    Visser-Vandewalle, Veerle
    Jessen, Frank
    Maintz, David
    Kuhn, Jens
    [J]. NEUROMODULATION, 2018, 21 (02): : 184 - 190
  • [4] Clinical and Biomarker Changes in Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer's Disease
    Bateman, Randall J.
    Xiong, Chengjie
    Benzinger, Tammie L. S.
    Fagan, Anne M.
    Goate, Alison
    Fox, Nick C.
    Marcus, Daniel S.
    Cairns, Nigel J.
    Xie, Xianyun
    Blazey, Tyler M.
    Holtzman, David M.
    Santacruz, Anna
    Buckles, Virginia
    Oliver, Angela
    Moulder, Krista
    Aisen, Paul S.
    Ghetti, Bernardino
    Klunk, William E.
    McDade, Eric
    Martins, Ralph N.
    Masters, Colin L.
    Mayeux, Richard
    Ringman, John M.
    Rossor, Martin N.
    Schofield, Peter R.
    Sperling, Reisa A.
    Salloway, Stephen
    Morris, John C.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 367 (09) : 795 - 804
  • [5] Borenstein M., 2009, Introduction to Meta-Analysis
  • [6] A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis
    Borenstein, Michael
    Hedges, Larry V.
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Rothstein, Hannah R.
    [J]. RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2010, 1 (02) : 97 - 111
  • [7] Alzheimer's disease: risk factors and potentially protective measures
    Ferreira Silva, Marcos Vinicius
    Gomide Loures, Cristina de Mello
    Vieira Alves, Luan Carlos
    de Souza, Leonardo Cruz
    Gomes Borges, Karina Braga
    Carvalho, Maria das Gracas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 26 (1)
  • [8] Longitudinal assessment of the neuroanatomical consequences of deep brain stimulation: Application of fornical DBS in an Alzheimer's mouse model
    Gallino, Daniel
    Devenyi, Gabriel A.
    Germann, Jurgen
    Guma, Elisa
    Anastassiadis, Chloe
    Chakravarty, M. Mallar
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH, 2019, 1715 : 213 - 223
  • [9] Default-mode network activity distinguishes Alzheimer's disease from healthy aging: Evidence from functional MRI
    Greicius, MD
    Srivastava, G
    Reiss, AL
    Menon, V
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2004, 101 (13) : 4637 - 4642
  • [10] Deep Brain Stimulation of the Nucleus Basalis of Meynert in Alzheimer's Dementia: Potential Predictors of Cognitive Change and Results of a Long-Term Follow-Up in Eight Patients
    Hardenacke, K.
    Hashemiyoon, R.
    Visser-Vandewalle, V.
    Zapf, A.
    Freund, H. J.
    Sturm, V.
    Hellmich, M.
    Kuhn, J.
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2016, 9 (05) : 799 - 800