The impact of information and communication technology on carbon emissions in China: spatial effect and mechanism discussion

被引:9
作者
Liu, Gan [1 ]
Wan, Sanyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Hangzhou Dianzi Univ, Coll Econ, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
关键词
Spatial spillover; ICT; CO2; emissions; Dynamic spatial Durbin model; Urban panel; CO2; EMISSIONS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION; DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; PANEL-DATA; ICT; POPULATION; PRODUCTIVITY; EFFICIENCY; POLLUTION;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-23201-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Information and communication technology (ICT) has exerted a great impact on the socio-economic development; however, this development has come with some potential influence on climate change. The academics are divided over this issue; some argue that ICT has contributed to carbon reduction, while others consider that ICT has increased carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Undoubtedly, the existing literature abounds in the relationship between ICT and CO2 emissions, but little attention has been paid to the spillover effect of ICT and CO2 emissions, especially in developing countries. Hence, with the panel data of 285 China's prefecture-level cities from 2004 to 2018, this study innovatively discusses the spatial and mechanism effects of ICT on CO2 emissions, further exploring the heterogeneous impact of ICT on CO2 emissions from multiple perspectives. The empirical results confirm the positive relationship between ICT and CO2 emissions and identify the spatial spillover effect in the relationship. Furthermore, notably, the intermediary effect of energy consumption on the impact of ICT on CO2 emissions is identified. Finally, due to the differences in the geographical position, population size, and urban agglomeration of prefecture-level cities in China, the impact of ICT on CO2 emissions varies in different cities. The findings not only contribute to advancing the existing literature but also have a significant and targeted policy guiding significance for the cities to maximize the favorable influences of ICT and promote the low-carbon transformation of the whole society.
引用
收藏
页码:16178 / 16194
页数:17
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Environmental efficiency evaluation for Xiangjiang River basin cities based on an improved SBM model and Global Malmquist index [J].
An, Qingxian ;
Wu, Qifan ;
Li, Jinlin ;
Xiong, Beibei ;
Chen, Xiaohong .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 81 :95-103
[2]   ICT and environmental sustainability: A global perspective [J].
Anon Higon, Dolores ;
Gholami, Roya ;
Shirazi, Farid .
TELEMATICS AND INFORMATICS, 2017, 34 (04) :85-95
[3]   LOCAL INDICATORS OF SPATIAL ASSOCIATION - LISA [J].
ANSELIN, L .
GEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS, 1995, 27 (02) :93-115
[4]   ICT, openness and CO2 emissions in Africa [J].
Asongu, Simplice A. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2018, 25 (10) :9351-9359
[5]   ICT, energy consumption, financial development, and environmental degradation in South Africa [J].
Atsu, Francis ;
Adams, Samuel ;
Adjei, Joseph .
HELIYON, 2021, 7 (07)
[6]   Does an N-shaped association exist between pollution and ICT in Turkey? ARDL and quantile regression approaches [J].
Baris-Tuzemen, Ozge ;
Tuzemen, Samet ;
Celik, Ali Kemal .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (17) :20786-20799
[7]   Exploring the role of ICT on household behavioural energy efficiency to mitigate global warming [J].
Bastida, Leire ;
Cohen, Jed J. ;
Kollmann, Andrea ;
Moya, Ana ;
Reichl, Johannes .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 103 :455-462
[8]   Assessing ICT global emissions footprint: Trends to 2040 & recommendations [J].
Belkhir, Lotfi ;
Elmeligi, Ahmed .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 177 :448-463
[9]   Does ICT diffusion matter for corruption? An Economic Development Perspective [J].
Ben Ali, Mohamed Sami ;
Gasmi, Amira .
TELEMATICS AND INFORMATICS, 2017, 34 (08) :1445-1453
[10]   Does ICT change the relationship between total factor productivity and CO2 emissions? Evidence based on a nonlinear model [J].
Ben Lahouel, Bechir ;
Taleb, Lotfi ;
Ben Zaied, Younes ;
Managi, Shunsuke .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2021, 101