The impact of ambiguity-loving attitude on market participation and asset pricing

被引:1
作者
Sun, Yuzhe [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Yanjie [3 ]
Zhang, Shunming [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Helen [4 ]
机构
[1] Renmin Univ China, China Financial Policy Res Ctr, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China
[2] Renmin Univ China, Sch Finance, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China
[3] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Finance, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Regina, Fac Business Adm, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ambiguity loving; Limited participation; Crowding-out effect; Asset pricing; General equilibrium; LIFETIME PORTFOLIO SELECTION; FIELD EXPERIMENT; UNCERTAINTY; RISK; UTILITY; MODELS; WEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106527
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Ambiguity-averse attitudes are widely accepted to influence investors' behavior; however, the impact of ambiguity-loving attitudes has yet to be thoroughly investigated. This paper examines the effect of the ambiguity-loving attitude on market participation and asset pricing. We propose a model incorporating investors with an ambiguity-loving attitude, determining that ambiguity-loving individuals have higher allocations in risky assets, crowding out other investors and extending their nonparticipation region. When the market supply is small, ambiguity-loving investors' discontinuous and non-unique demand mapping can cause "flat ranges"in equilibrium prices. When the market supply is moderate or large, increasing the ambiguity level or ambiguity-loving investors' fraction reduces equity premium. With short-sales constraints, the effect of ambiguity-loving investors' attitudes remains unchanged except for their positions and the equity premium. With heterogeneous opinions, a rising ambiguity level or ambiguity-loving investors' fraction increases equity premiums when they only hold short positions.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Ambiguity aversion and stock market participation: An empirical analysis [J].
Antoniou, Constantinos ;
Harris, Richard D. F. ;
Zhang, Ruogu .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2015, 58 :57-70
[2]   Testing Ambiguity Models through the Measurement of Probabilities for Gains and Losses [J].
Baillon, Aurelien ;
Bleichrodt, Han .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-MICROECONOMICS, 2015, 7 (02) :77-100
[3]   AMBIGUITY SEEKING IN MULTIATTRIBUTE DECISIONS - EFFECTS OF OPTIMISM AND MESSAGE FRAMING [J].
BIER, VM ;
CONNELL, BL .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 1994, 7 (03) :169-182
[4]   ALLOCATION OF WEALTH TO RISKY ASSETS - ASSET STRUCTURE OF INDIVIDUAL PORTFOLIOS AND SOME IMPLICATIONS FOR UTILITY FUNCTIONS [J].
BLUME, ME ;
FRIEND, I .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1975, 30 (02) :585-603
[5]   Asset pricing and ambiguity: Empirical evidence [J].
Brenner, Menachem ;
Izhakian, Yehuda .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 130 (03) :503-531
[6]   Model uncertainty, limited market participation, and asset prices [J].
Cao, HH ;
Wang, T ;
Zhang, HH .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2005, 18 (04) :1219-1251
[7]   Breadth of ownership and stock returns [J].
Chen, J ;
Hong, H ;
Stein, JC .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 66 (2-3) :171-205
[8]   Ambiguity aversion and household portfolio choice puzzles: Empirical evidence [J].
Dimmock, Stephen G. ;
Kouwenberg, Roy ;
Mitchell, Olivia S. ;
Peijnenburg, Kim .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 119 (03) :559-577
[9]   Estimating ambiguity preferences and perceptions in multiple prior models: Evidence from the field [J].
Dimmock, Stephen G. ;
Kouwenberg, Roy ;
Mitchell, Olivia S. ;
Peijnenburg, Kim .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2015, 51 (03) :219-244
[10]   UNCERTAINTY AVERSION, RISK-AVERSION, AND THE OPTIMAL CHOICE OF PORTFOLIO [J].
DOW, J ;
WERLANG, SRD .
ECONOMETRICA, 1992, 60 (01) :197-204