Comparison of Structural Diagnosis and Management (SDM) approach and MyoFascial Release (MFR) for improving plantar heel pain, ankle range of motion and disability: A randomized clinical trial

被引:0
|
作者
Akter, Sapia [1 ]
Hossain, Mohammad Shahadat [1 ]
Hossain, K. M. Amran [1 ,2 ,8 ]
Uddin, Zakir [3 ]
Hossain, Mohammad Anwar [4 ]
Alom, Foisal [5 ]
Kabir, Md. Feroz [2 ]
Walton, Lori Maria [6 ]
Raigangar, Veena [7 ]
机构
[1] Inst Adv Mech Correct Therapy, Dept Musculoskeletal Med, Dhaka, Bangladesh
[2] Jashore Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Jashore, Bangladesh
[3] McMaster Univ, Sch Rehabil Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] Bangladesh Hlth Profess Inst, Dept Physiotherapy, Dhaka, Bangladesh
[5] Natl Inst Traumatol & Orthoped Rehabil NITOR, Dhaka, Bangladesh
[6] Univ Scranton, Panuska Coll Profess Studies, Dept Phys Therapy, Scranton, PA USA
[7] Univ Brighton, Sch Sport & Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy, Brighton, England
[8] Jashore Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Jashore 7408, Bangladesh
关键词
Plantar heel pain; MFR; SDM; FADI; FFI; Disability; WINDLASS MECHANISM; FASCIITIS; FOOT; RELIABILITY; PATHOMECHANICS; OUTCOMES; INDEX;
D O I
10.1080/10669817.2023.2214020
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the Structural Diagnosis and Management (SDM) approach with Myofascial Release (MFR) in improving plantar heel pain, ankle range of motion, and disability. [Subjects] Sixty-four subjects, aged 30-60 years, with a diagnosis of plantar heel pain, plantar fasciitis, or calcaneal spur by a physician according to ICD-10, were equally allocated to the MFR (n = 32) and SDM (n = 32) groups by hospital randomization and concealed allocation. [Methods] In this assessor-blinded randomized clinical trial, the control group performed MFR to the plantar surface of the foot, triceps surae, and deep posterior compartment calf muscles, while the experimental group performed a multimodal approach utilizing the SDM concept for 12 sessions over 4 weeks. Both groups also received strengthening exercises, ice compression, and ultrasound therapy. Pain, activity limitations and disability were assessed as primary outcomes using the Foot Function Index (FFI) and Range of motion (ROM) assessment of the ankle dorsiflexors and plantar flexors using a universal goniometer. Secondary outcomes were measured using the Foot Ankle Disability Index (FADI) and a 10-point manual muscle testing process for the ankle dorsiflexors and plantar flexors. [Results] Both MFR and SDM groups exhibited significant improvements from baseline in all outcome variables, including pain, activity level, disability, range of motion, and function after the 12-week intervention period (p < .05). The SDM group showed more improvements than MFR for FFI pain (p < .01), FFI activity (p < .01), FFI (p < .01) and FADI (p = <.01). [Conclusion] Both MFR and SDM approaches are effective in reducing pain, improving function, ankle range of motion, and reducing disability in plantar heel pain, however, the SDM approach may be a preferred treatment option.
引用
收藏
页码:368 / 377
页数:10
相关论文
共 2 条
  • [1] A comparison of mobilization and mobilization with movement on pain and range of motion in people with lateral ankle sprain: A randomized clinical trial
    Norouzi, Adeleh
    Delkhoush, Cyrus Taghizadeh
    Mirmohammadkhani, Majid
    Bagheri, Rasool
    JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2021, 27 : 654 - 660
  • [2] Effects of Myofascial Self-Release on Range of Motion, Pressure Pain Threshold, and Hamstring Strength in Asymptomatic Individuals: A Randomized, Controlled, Blind Clinical Trial
    Nehring, Alexandre
    Serafim, Thiago Teixeira
    Silva, Elisa Raulino
    de Menezes, Fabio Sprada
    Maffulli, Nicola
    Sanada, Luciana Sayuri
    Okubo, Rodrigo
    JOURNAL OF SPORT REHABILITATION, 2021, 30 (06) : 920 - 925