Post-Trust, Not Post-Truth

被引:2
作者
Jones, Ward E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rhodes Univ, Dept Philosophy, ZA-6140 Makhanda, South Africa
关键词
Blaise Pascal; bias; deliberative democracy; epistemic bubble; history of rape; political epistemology; post-truth; public reason; sexual assault; testimony;
D O I
10.1080/08913811.2023.2240148
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The neologism post-truth is commonly used to characterize a polity in which false and biased beliefs have corrupted public opinion and policymaking. Simplifying and broadening our use of the adjective beyond its current narrow meaning could make post-truth a useful addition to the lexicons of history, politics, and philosophy. Its current use, however, is unhelpful and distracting (at best), and experienced as demeaning and humiliating (at worst). Contemporary polities are better characterized as post-trust. A polity becames post-trust when testimony from either a community of knowledge workers or a social group of complainants-such as women who give testimony of sexual assault-loses influence upon public opinion and policymaking.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 93
页数:31
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Anderson Elizabeth., 2021, POLITICAL EPISTEMOLO
[2]  
Bart B. F., 1955, ROMANCE PHILOL, V9, P1
[3]  
Bloor D., 1976, KNOWLEDGE SOCIAL IMA
[4]  
Brownmiller Susan., OUR WILL MEN WOMEN R
[5]  
Brumberg JoanJacobs., 1998, The Body Project: An Intimate History of American Girls
[6]  
Carter Dan T., 2007, SCOTTSBORO
[7]  
Flew Antony., 1976, PRESUMPTION ATHEISM
[8]  
Freedman EstelleB., 2013, Redefining Rape: Sexual Violence in The Era of Suffrage and Segregation
[9]   NYMPHOMANIA - THE HISTORICAL CONSTRUCTION OF FEMALE SEXUALITY [J].
GRONEMAN, C .
SIGNS, 1994, 19 (02) :337-367
[10]  
Jones WE, 1998, J HIST PHILOS, V36, P167