Patient and Health Care Provider Perspectives on Patient Access to Test Results via Web Portals: Scoping Review

被引:11
|
作者
Petrovskaya, Olga [1 ,5 ]
Karpman, Albina [2 ]
Schilling, Joanna [1 ]
Singh, Simran [3 ]
Wegren, Larissa [4 ]
Caine, Vera [1 ]
Kusi-Appiah, Elizabeth [3 ]
Geen, Willow [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Victoria, Sch Nursing, Victoria, BC, Canada
[2] MacEwan Univ, Fac Nursing, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Alberta, Fac Nursing, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[4] South Hlth Campus, Womens Hlth, Calgary, AB, Canada
[5] Univ Victoria, Sch Nursing, POB 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada
关键词
patient portal; web portal; MyChart; electronic health records; personal health records; patient access to records; laboratory tests; radiology reports; diagnostic imaging; laboratory test results; result release; embargo; the Cures Act; RADIOLOGY REPORTS; MEDICAL-RECORDS; ONLINE PORTALS; PERCEPTIONS; ENGAGEMENT; DETERMINANTS; OUTCOMES; CANCER;
D O I
10.2196/43765
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A frequently used feature of electronic patient portals is the viewing of test results. Research on patient portals is abundant and offers evidence to help portal implementers make policy and practice decisions. In contrast, no comparable comprehensive summary of research addresses the direct release of and patient access to test results. Objective: This scoping review aims to analyze and synthesize published research focused on patient and health care provider perspectives on the direct release of laboratory, imaging, and radiology results to patients via web portals. Methods: PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed. Searches were conducted in CINAHL, MEDLINE, and other databases. Citations were screened in Covidence using the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Primary studies that focused on patient and health care provider perspectives on patient access to laboratory and imaging results via web portals were included. An updated search was conducted up to August 2023. Our review included 27 articles-20 examining patient views, 3 examining provider views, and 4 examining both patient and provider views. Data extraction and inductive data analysis were informed by sensitizing concepts from sociomaterial perspectives, and 15 themes were generated. Results: Patient perspectives (24 papers) were synthesized using nine themes: (1) patterns of use and patient characteristics; (2) emotional response when viewing the results and uncertainty about their implications; (3) understanding test results; (4) preferences for mode and timing of result release; (5). information seeking and patients' actions motivated by viewing results via a portal; (6) contemplating changes in behavior and managing own health; (7) benefits of accessing test results via a portal; (8) limitations of accessing test results via a portal; and (9) suggestions for portal improvement. Health care provider perspectives (7 papers) were synthetized into six themes: (1) providers' view of benefits of patient access to results via the portal; (2) effects on health care provider workload; (3) concerns about patient anxiety; (4) timing of result release into the patient portal; (5) the method of result release into the patient portal: manual versus automatic release; and (6) the effects of hospital health information technology system on patient quality outcomes. Conclusions: The timing of the release of test results emerged as a particularly important topic. In some countries, the policy context may motivate immediate release of most tests directly into patient portals. However, our findings aim to make policy makers, health administrators, and other stakeholders aware of factors to consider when making decisions about the timing of result release. This review is sensitive to the characteristics of patient populations and portal technology and can inform result release framework policies. The findings are timely, as patient portals have become more common internationally.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Illicit drug use while admitted to hospital: Patient and health care provider perspectives
    Strike, Carol
    Robinson, Samantha
    Guta, Adrian
    Tan, Darrell H.
    O'Leary, Bill
    Cooper, Curtis
    Upshur, Ross
    Carusone, Soo Chan
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (03):
  • [32] Alignment Among Patient, Caregiver, and Health Care Provider Perspectives on Hemodialysis Vascular Access Decision-Making: A Qualitative Study
    Schneider, Angela R.
    Ravani, Pietro
    King-Shier, Kathryn M.
    Quinn, Robert R.
    Macrae, Jennifer M.
    Love, Shannan
    Oliver, Matthew J.
    Hiremath, Swapnil
    James, Matthew T.
    Ortiz, Mia
    Manns, Braden R.
    Elliott, Meghan J.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY HEALTH AND DISEASE, 2023, 10
  • [33] Users’ perspectives on a demonstration to increase shared access to older adults’ patient portals
    Vadim Dukhanin
    Jennifer L. Wolff
    Kelly Gleason
    Deborah Wachenheim
    Liz Salmi
    Matthew J. Gonzales
    Marianne Parshley
    Sara Epstein
    Supriya Mohile
    Timothy W. Farrell
    Mark A. Supiano
    Catherine M. DesRoches
    BMC Health Services Research, 25 (1)
  • [34] Informed or anxious: patient preferences for release of test results of increasing sensitivity on electronic patient portals
    Bethany Bruno
    Scott Steele
    Justin Carbone
    Katherine Schneider
    Lori Posk
    Susannah L. Rose
    Health and Technology, 2022, 12 : 59 - 67
  • [35] Health Care Professionals' Experiences of Patient-Professional Communication Over Patient Portals: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies
    Laukka, Elina
    Huhtakangas, Moona
    Heponiemi, Tarja
    Kujala, Sari
    Kaihlanen, Anu-Marja
    Gluschkoff, Kia
    Kanste, Outi
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (12)
  • [36] Informed or anxious: patient preferences for release of test results of increasing sensitivity on electronic patient portals
    Bruno, Bethany
    Steele, Scott
    Carbone, Justin
    Schneider, Katherine
    Posk, Lori
    Rose, Susannah L.
    HEALTH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 12 (01) : 59 - 67
  • [37] Contextual Factors That Impact the Implementation of Patient Portals With a Focus on Older People in Acute Care Hospitals: Scoping Review
    Khadjesari, Zarnie
    Houghton, Julie
    Brown, Tracey J.
    Jopling, Helena
    Stevenson, Fiona
    Lynch, Jennifer
    JMIR AGING, 2023, 6 (01)
  • [38] Presentation of laboratory test results in patient portals: influence of interface design on risk interpretation and visual search behaviour
    Fraccaro, Paolo
    Vigo, Markel
    Balatsoukas, Panagiotis
    van der Veer, Sabine N.
    Hassan, Lamiece
    Williams, Richard
    Wood, Grahame
    Sinha, Smeeta
    Buchan, Iain
    Peek, Niels
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2018, 18
  • [39] Health Care Provider Barriers to Patient Referral to Palliative Care
    Enguidanos, Susan
    Cardenas, Valeria
    Wenceslao, Melissa
    Hoe, Deborah
    Mejia, Kiara
    Lomeli, Sindy
    Rahman, Anna
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 38 (09) : 1112 - 1119
  • [40] Patient Perspectives on Advance Care Planning via a Patient Portal
    Jordan, Sarah R.
    Brungardt, Adreanne
    Phimphasone-Brady, Phoutdavone
    Lum, Hillary D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2019, 36 (08) : 682 - 687