The institutional environment and gig platform transaction cost solutions

被引:0
作者
Golovanova, Svetlana [1 ]
Ribeiro, Eduardo Pontual [2 ]
Styrin, Evgeny [3 ]
Makarov, Ivan [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Univ Higher Sch Econ, Nizhnii Novgorod, Russia
[2] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Inst Econ, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[3] Natl Res Univ Higher Sch Econ, Digital Transformat Publ Adm Lab, Moscow, Russia
关键词
institutions; labour market regulation; labour platforms; transaction costs; D02; J44; M55; ECONOMICS; GOVERNANCE; MARKETS;
D O I
10.1017/S1744137423000383
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A growing number of labour market participants transact through gig platforms. This choice should reflect a reduction in transaction costs for platform users, compared to costs they meet when using alternative modes of governance. We exploit a unique cross-platform, cross-country data set of gig platform users to test the impact of the institutional environment in one of its dimensions - the strictness of labour market regulation (LMR) - on the ability of gig platforms to reduce users' transaction costs. According to our findings, the regulation indicator of both the user and platform countries influences transaction costs for platform users, even controlling for platform and user characteristics. The platform appears to reduce transaction costs most when users face stricter or weaker LMR, in a U-shaped effect. In the former case, the platform may provide an escape from labour regulations when hiring for tasks, while in the latter case, the platform can economize on the usual transaction costs of private contracting by administrating some types of users' activities.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Labor Laws and Innovation
    Acharya, Viral V.
    Baghai, Ramin P.
    Subramanian, Krishnamurthy V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 2013, 56 (04) : 997 - 1037
  • [2] Akbar Y. H., 2023, J DIGITAL EC, V1, P209, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdec.2023.01.002, DOI 10.1016/J.JDEC.2023.01.002]
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2020, Summary Report
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1990, I I CHANGE EC PERFOR, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511808678
  • [5] Is Tinkering with Institutional Quality a Panacea for Firm Performance? Insights from a Semiparametric Approach to Modeling Firm Performance
    Bhaumik, Sumon Kumar
    Dimova, Ralitza
    Kumbhakar, Subal C.
    Sun, Kai
    [J]. REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2018, 22 (01) : 1 - 22
  • [6] BOGLIACINO Francesco, 2020, Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics, P1
  • [7] The Nature of the Firm
    Coase, R. H.
    [J]. ECONOMICA-NEW SERIES, 1937, 4 (16): : 386 - 405
  • [8] THE PROBLEM OF SOCIAL COST
    COASE, RH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1960, 3 (OCT) : 1 - 44
  • [9] TRANSACTION COST THEORY: PAST PROGRESS, CURRENT CHALLENGES, AND SUGGESTIONS FOR THE FUTURE
    Cuypers, Ilya R. P.
    Hennart, Jean-Francois
    Silverman, Brian S.
    Ertug, Gokhan
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2021, 15 (01) : 111 - 150
  • [10] DESTEFANO V, 2015, COMP LABOR LAW POLIC, V0037