Language learners' linguistic investment in ideologically framed language institutes: Forms of capital, ideology, and identity

被引:0
作者
Tajeddin, Zia [1 ]
Kerfoot, Caroline [2 ]
Fereydoonfar, Mahmoud [3 ]
机构
[1] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Fac Humanities, Dept English Language Teaching, Tehran, Iran
[2] Stockholm Univ, Dept Swedish Language & Multilingualism, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Allameh Tabatabai Univ, Dept English Language & Literature, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Investment; Ideology; Capital; Identity; Non-state language institute; English language learning; ENGLISH; IRAN; EDUCATION; ENVIRONMENT; POLICIES; EXAMPLE; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.linged.2023.101220
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Language learning in Iran is a site of struggle between two ideologically opposed spaces, state schools and non-state language institutes. This study drew on the construct of investment , which combines ideology, capital , and identity , to investigate the investment of Iranian English language learners at A1 and C2 proficiency levels at a non-state language institute. The learners in focus group interviews discussed different language-related resources influencing their investment, their expectations, and their language learning activities. The findings indicated that diverse ideological, cultural, and economic resources and imagined futures had led them toward investing at the institute. They were further found to be invested in diverse language learning activities beyond the pedagogical frame of the institute. Some aspects of investment, language-related beliefs, and identities varied across proficiency levels. Even though the ideological structures of these institutes are learner-centered, there are strong possibilities for enslavement to an extreme globally-oriented pedagogy or native-speakerism. It is hence suggested that state schools and non-state institutes draw upon more flexible language pedagogies embracing both local and global values.& COPY; 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 101 条
  • [1] Aghagolzadeh F, 2017, LANG POLICY SER, V13, P47, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-46778-8_4
  • [2] Barbour R., 2018, DOING FOCUS GROUPS
  • [3] Berg Bruce.L., 2001, QUALITATIVE RES METH
  • [4] Block D., 2012, NEOLIBERALISM APPL L
  • [5] Block D., 2010, The handbook of language and globalization, P287
  • [6] Blommaert J, 2013, CRIT LANG LIT STUD, V18, P1
  • [7] Borjian M, 2013, NEW PERSP LANG EDUC, P1
  • [8] Borjian M., 2010, VIEWPOINTS SPECIAL E, V1, P58
  • [9] Bourdieu P., 1979, DISTINCTION SOCIAL C
  • [10] Bourdieu P., 1991, LANGUAGE SYMBOLIC PO