Liquefaction Potential Assessment of Soils Using Machine Learning Techniques: A State-of-the-Art Review from 1994-2021

被引:19
|
作者
Jas, Kaushik [1 ]
Dodagoudar, G. R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Madras, Dept Civil Engn, Chennai 600036, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol Madras, Dept Civil Engn, Computat Geomech Lab, Chennai 600036, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Earthquake geotechnics; Liquefaction potential; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Ground response; Conventional methods; Liquefaction database; ML algorithms; Computational efficiency; GROUND-MOTION PARAMETERS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; PROBABILISTIC NEURAL-NETWORK; CONE PENETRATION TEST; SEISMIC LIQUEFACTION; BAYESIAN NETWORK; DETERMINISTIC ASSESSMENT; MODEL UNCERTAINTY; PREDICTION EQUATIONS; ENERGY-DISSIPATION;
D O I
10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-7788
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a powerful tool for prediction of systems behavior in many engineering disciplines. A few applications of ML techniques are available in geotechnical engineering and other fields of civil engineering. The existing review studies on the application of ML techniques in conventional geotechnical engineering and earthquake geotechnics are available in the broader areas but not specific to liquefaction phenomenon. Studies exist on the liquefaction potential of cohesionless soils using ML techniques with a varying degree of success. More studies are needed to formalize the use of ML techniques in the seismic liquefaction assessment. In this review, an attempt is made to critically review the existing literature on ML techniques as applied to the liquefaction analysis. The published literature from 1994 to 2021 has been collected, critically reviewed, and presented systematically in the form of easy to understand tables and figures. The tables are labeled based on the data requirement in ML techniques, conventional methods, and in-situ tests. A summary table highlights the relative importance of input variables in the dataset required for the liquefaction potential assessment. Limitations of conventional methods and existing ML models, the importance of a large database, relative comparison of the four developed ML models, and the requirement of probabilistic analysis are included. A gap in the existing literature is outlined and followed by a way forward for future research. It is concluded that there is a need to update the liquefaction database and modify existing ML algorithms so that they become computationally efficient and reliable for liquefaction potential assessment.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Machine Learning in Directed Energy Deposition (DED) Additive Manufacturing: A State-of-the-art Review
    Era, Israt Zarin
    Farahani, Mojtaba A.
    Wuest, Thorsten
    Liu, Zhichao
    MANUFACTURING LETTERS, 2023, 35 : 689 - 700
  • [22] Machine-Learning-Based Prediction Modelling in Primary Care: State-of-the-Art Review
    El-Sherbini, Adham H.
    Virk, Hafeez Ul Hassan
    Wang, Zhen
    Glicksberg, Benjamin S.
    Krittanawong, Chayakrit
    AI, 2023, 4 (02) : 437 - 460
  • [23] Deep Learning Techniques and Imaging in Otorhinolaryngology-A State-of-the-Art Review
    Tsilivigkos, Christos
    Athanasopoulos, Michail
    di Micco, Riccardo
    Giotakis, Aris
    Mastronikolis, Nicholas S.
    Mulita, Francesk
    Verras, Georgios-Ioannis
    Maroulis, Ioannis
    Giotakis, Evangelos
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (22)
  • [24] Credit Card Fraud Detection Using State-of-the-Art Machine Learning and Deep Learning Algorithms
    Alarfaj, Fawaz Khaled
    Malik, Iqra
    Khan, Hikmat Ullah
    Almusallam, Naif
    Ramzan, Muhammad
    Ahmed, Muzamil
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 39700 - 39715
  • [25] Evaluation and analysis of liquefaction potential of gravelly soils using explainable probabilistic machine learning model
    Jas, Kaushik
    Mangalathu, Sujith
    Dodagoudar, G. R.
    COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2024, 167
  • [26] A critical review on the state-of-the-art and future prospects of machine learning for Earth observation operations
    Miralles, Pablo
    Thangavel, Kathiravan
    Scannapieco, Antonio Fulvio
    Jagadam, Nitya
    Baranwal, Prerna
    Faldu, Bhavin
    Abhang, Ruchita
    Bhatia, Sahil
    Bonnart, Sebastien
    Bhatnagar, Ishita
    Batul, Beenish
    Prasad, Pallavi
    Ortega-Gonzalez, Hector
    Joseph, Harrish
    More, Harshal
    Morchedi, Sondes
    Panda, Aman Kumar
    Di Fraia, Marco Zaccaria
    Wischert, Daniel
    Stepanova, Daria
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2023, 71 (12) : 4959 - 4986
  • [27] Successfully implemented artificial intelligence and machine learning applications in cardiology: State-of-the-art review
    Van den Eynde, Jef
    Lachmann, Mark
    Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig
    Manlhiot, Cedric
    Kutty, Shelby
    TRENDS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2023, 33 (05) : 265 - 271
  • [28] Applications of machine learning in pipeline integrity management: A state-of-the-art review
    Rachman, Andika
    Zhang, Tieling
    Ratnayake, R. M. Chandima
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING, 2021, 193
  • [29] Machine Learning in the Stochastic Analysis of Slope Stability: A State-of-the-Art Review
    Xu, Haoding
    He, Xuzhen
    Shan, Feng
    Niu, Gang
    Sheng, Daichao
    MODELLING, 2023, 4 (04): : 426 - 453
  • [30] Application of machine learning and emerging remote sensing techniques in hydrology: A state-of-the-art review and current research trends
    Saha, Asish
    Pal, Subodh Chandra
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2024, 632