Performance of ChatGPT on Nephrology Test Questions

被引:41
作者
Miao, Jing [1 ]
Thongprayoon, Charat [1 ]
Valencia, Oscar A. Garcia [1 ]
Krisanapan, Pajaree [1 ]
Sheikh, Mohammad S. [1 ]
Davis, Paul W. [1 ]
Mekraksakit, Poemlarp [1 ]
Suarez, Maria Gonzalez [1 ]
Craici, Iasmina M. [1 ]
Cheungpasitporn, Wisit [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Med, Div Nephrol & Hypertens, Rochester, MN 55902 USA
来源
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY | 2024年 / 19卷 / 01期
关键词
clinical nephrology; kidney disease; medical education;
D O I
10.2215/CJN.0000000000000330
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background ChatGPT is a novel tool that allows people to engage in conversations with an advanced machine learning model. ChatGPT's performance in the US Medical Licensing Examination is comparable with a successful candidate's performance. However, its performance in the nephrology field remains undetermined. This study assessed ChatGPT's capabilities in answering nephrology test questions.Methods Questions sourced from Nephrology Self-Assessment Program and Kidney Self-Assessment Program were used, each with multiple-choice single-answer questions. Questions containing visual elements were excluded. Each question bank was run twice using GPT-3.5 and GPT-4. Total accuracy rate, defined as the percentage of correct answers obtained by ChatGPT in either the first or second run, and the total concordance, defined as the percentage of identical answers provided by ChatGPT during both runs, regardless of their correctness, were used to assess its performance.Results A comprehensive assessment was conducted on a set of 975 questions, comprising 508 questions from Nephrology Self-Assessment Program and 467 from Kidney Self-Assessment Program. GPT-3.5 resulted in a total accuracy rate of 51%. Notably, the employment of Nephrology Self-Assessment Program yielded a higher accuracy rate compared with Kidney Self-Assessment Program (58% versus 44%; P < 0.001). The total concordance rate across all questions was 78%, with correct answers exhibiting a higher concordance rate (84%) compared with incorrect answers (73%) (P < 0.001). When examining various nephrology subfields, the total accuracy rates were relatively lower in electrolyte and acid-base disorder, glomerular disease, and kidney-related bone and stone disorders. The total accuracy rate of GPT-4's response was 74%, higher than GPT-3.5 (P < 0.001) but remained below the passing threshold and average scores of nephrology examinees (77%).Conclusions ChatGPT exhibited limitations regarding accuracy and repeatability when addressing nephrology-related questions. Variations in performance were evident across various subfields.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 43
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Anil R., 2023, ARXIV, DOI DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.2305.10403
  • [2] [Anonymous], INTR CHATGPT
  • [3] Performance of ChatGPT on a Radiology Board-style Examination: Insights into Current Strengths and Limitations
    Bhayana, Rajesh
    Krishna, Satheesh
    Bleakney, Robert R.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2023, 307 (05)
  • [4] ChatGPT Performance on the American Urological Association Self-assessment Study Program and the Potential Influence of Artificial Intelligence in Urologic Training
    Deebel, Nicholas A.
    Terlecki, Ryan
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2023, 177 : 29 - 33
  • [5] Eysenbach Gunther, 2023, JMIR Med Educ, V9, pe46885, DOI 10.2196/46885
  • [6] Giannos Panagiotis, 2023, JMIR Med Educ, V9, pe47737, DOI 10.2196/47737
  • [7] Gilson Aidan, 2023, JMIR Med Educ, V9, pe45312, DOI 10.2196/45312
  • [8] ChatGPT Provides References That Are Real, Inappropriate, or (Most Often) Fake
    Hoffer, Eric K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 34 (12) : 2240 - 2242
  • [9] Are ChatGPT's knowledge and interpretation ability comparable to those of medical students in Korea for taking a parasitology examination?: a descriptive study
    Huh, Sun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION FOR HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2023, 20
  • [10] Revolutionizing Chronic Kidney Disease Management with Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence
    Krisanapan, Pajaree
    Tangpanithandee, Supawit
    Thongprayoon, Charat
    Pattharanitima, Pattharawin
    Cheungpasitporn, Wisit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (08)