Combined diagnosis of multiparametric MRI-based deep learning models facilitates differentiating triple-negative breast cancer from fibroadenoma magnetic resonance BI-RADS 4 lesions

被引:7
作者
Yin, Hao-lin [1 ]
Jiang, Yu [2 ]
Xu, Zihan [3 ,4 ]
Jia, Hui-hui [1 ]
Lin, Guang-wu [1 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Huadong Hosp, Dept Radiol, 221 Yananxi Rd, Shanghai 200040, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Radiol, 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Lung Canc Ctr, Canc Ctr, 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, State Key Lab Biotherapy, 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Breast cancer; Deep learning; Neural network; Breast MRI; Triple-negative breast cancer; COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS; IMAGING PHENOTYPES; ULTRASOUND; FEATURES; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00432-022-04142-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose To investigate the value of the combined diagnosis of multiparametric MRI-based deep learning models to differentiate triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) from fibroadenoma magnetic resonance Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System category 4 (BI-RADS 4) lesions and to evaluate whether the combined diagnosis of these models could improve the diagnostic performance of radiologists. Methods A total of 319 female patients with 319 pathologically confirmed BI-RADS 4 lesions were randomly divided into training, validation, and testing sets in this retrospective study. The three models were established based on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and T2-weighted imaging using the training and validation sets. The artificial intelligence (AI) combination score was calculated according to the results of three models. The diagnostic performances of four radiologists with and without AI assistance were compared with the AI combination score on the testing set. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and weighted kappa value were calculated to assess the performance. Results The AI combination score yielded an excellent performance (AUC = 0.944) on the testing set. With AI assistance, the AUC for the diagnosis of junior radiologist 1 (JR1) increased from 0.833 to 0.885, and that for JR2 increased from 0.823 to 0.876. The AUCs of senior radiologist 1 (SR1) and SR2 slightly increased from 0.901 and 0.950 to 0.925 and 0.975 after AI assistance, respectively. Conclusion Combined diagnosis of multiparametric MRI-based deep learning models to differentiate TNBC from fibroadenoma magnetic resonance BI-RADS 4 lesions can achieve comparable performance to that of SRs and improve the diagnostic performance of JRs.
引用
收藏
页码:2575 / 2584
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Anders C, 2008, ONCOLOGY-NY, V22, P1233
  • [2] Breast mass classification in sonography with transfer learning using a deep convolutional neural network and color conversion
    Byra, Michel
    Galperin, Michael
    Ojeda-Fournier, Haydee
    Olson, Linda
    O'Boyle, Mary
    Comstock, Christopher
    Andre, Michael
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (02) : 746 - 755
  • [3] Application of computer-aided diagnosis in breast ultrasound interpretation: improvements in diagnostic performance according to reader experience
    Choi, Ji-Hye
    Kang, Bong Joo
    Baek, Ji Eun
    Lee, Hyun Sil
    Kim, Sung Hun
    [J]. ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2018, 37 (03) : 217 - 225
  • [4] Diffusion-weighted Imaging Allows for Downgrading MR BI-RADS 4 Lesions in Contrast-enhanced MRI of the Breast to Avoid Unnecessary Biopsy
    Clauser, Paola
    Krug, Barbara
    Bickel, Hubert
    Dietzel, Matthias
    Pinker, Katja
    Neuhaus, Victor-Frederic
    Marino, Maria Adele
    Moschetta, Marco
    Troiano, Nicoletta
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    Baltzer, Pascal A. T.
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 27 (07) : 1941 - 1948
  • [5] Association Between Sonographic Appearances of Breast Cancers and Their Histopathologic Features and Biomarkers
    Costantini, Melania
    Belli, Paolo
    Bufi, Enida
    Asunis, Anna Maria
    Ferra, Enrico
    Bitti, Grazia Tomasa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 2016, 44 (01) : 26 - 33
  • [6] COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH
    DELONG, ER
    DELONG, DM
    CLARKEPEARSON, DI
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) : 837 - 845
  • [7] Imaging of triple-negative breast cancer
    Dogan, B. E.
    Turnbull, L. W.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 : 23 - 29
  • [8] A deep learning methodology for improved breast cancer diagnosis using multiparametric MRI
    Hu, Qiyuan
    Whitney, Heather M.
    Giger, Maryellen L.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [9] Survival Outcomes for Patients with Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Implications for Clinical Practice and Trial Design
    Kassam, Farrah
    Enright, Katherine
    Dent, Rebecca
    Dranitsaris, George
    Myers, Jeff
    Flynn, Candi
    Fralick, Michael
    Kumar, Ritu
    Clemons, Mark
    [J]. CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2009, 9 (01) : 29 - 33
  • [10] Clinical application of S-Detect to breast masses on ultrasonography: a study evaluating the diagnostic performance and agreement with a dedicated breast radiologist
    Kim, Kiwook
    Song, Mi Kyung
    Kim, Eun-Kyung
    Yoon, Jung Hyun
    [J]. ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2017, 36 (01) : 3 - 9