A systematic review study on educational robotics and robots

被引:45
作者
Atman Uslu, Nilufer [1 ]
Yavuz, Gulay Ozture [1 ]
Kocak Usluel, Yasemin [1 ]
机构
[1] Manisa Celal Bayar Univ, Comp Educ & Instruct Technol Dept, Manisa, Turkey
关键词
Educational robotics; educational robots; systematic mapping; systematic review; COMPUTATIONAL THINKING; ELEMENTARY STUDENTS; TEACHING ASSISTANT; LEARNING ROBOTICS; FLIPPED CLASSROOM; STEM ENGAGEMENT; HUMANOID ROBOTS; DIGITAL NATIVES; SOCIAL ROBOTS; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1080/10494820.2021.2023890
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study, which systematically examines educational robotics and robots (ERR), has two purposes. (1) Classifying the research on the ERR to identify research trends and gaps, (2) Summarizing the experimental findings related to ERR and to interpret them according to the claims in the literature. A mixed method combining systematic mapping and systematic review were used in the study. Ninety-three articles published in Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) indexed journals and meeting the specified criteria were analyzed using a systematic mapping process. The results showed that 40 out of 93 articles did not include any learning theory. Thirty-two experimental studies were analyzed within the scope of the systematic review. The empirical findings supporting some of the claims about ERR are summarized and the research gaps in the claims that need to be supported by theoretical and pedagogical approaches are revealed.
引用
收藏
页码:5874 / 5898
页数:25
相关论文
共 102 条
[1]  
Alimisis D., 2009, Teacher education on robotics-enhanced constructivist pedagogical methods, P11
[2]  
Anwar S, 2019, Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), V9, DOI [10.7771/2157-9288.1223, DOI 10.7771/2157-9288.1223]
[3]   How Does the Degree of Guidance Support Students' Metacognitive and Problem Solving Skills in Educational Robotics? [J].
Atmatzidou, Soumela ;
Demetriadis, Stavros ;
Nika, Panagiota .
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 27 (01) :70-85
[4]  
Ayar MC, 2015, EDUC SCI-THEOR PRACT, V15, P1655
[5]   Reporting systematic reviews: Some lessons from a tertiary study [J].
Budgen, David ;
Brereton, Pearl ;
Drummond, Sarah ;
Williams, Nikki .
INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 95 :62-74
[6]   Active Learning Environments with Robotic Tangibles: Children's Physical and Virtual Spatial Programming Experiences [J].
Burleson, Winslow S. ;
Harlow, Danielle B. ;
Nilsen, Katherine J. ;
Perlin, Ken ;
Freed, Natalie ;
Jensen, Camilla Norgaard ;
Lahey, Byron ;
Lu, Patrick ;
Muldner, Kasia .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2018, 11 (01) :96-106
[7]   Can educational robotics introduce young children to robotics and how can we measure it? [J].
Castro, Emanuela ;
Cecchi, Francesca ;
Valente, Massimiliano ;
Buselli, Elisa ;
Salvini, Pericle ;
Dario, Paolo .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2018, 34 (06) :970-977
[8]   Empowering technology and engineering for STEM education through programming robots: a systematic literature review [J].
Cetin, Mustafa ;
Demircan, Hasibe Ozlen .
EARLY CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND CARE, 2020, 190 (09) :1323-1335
[9]  
Chambers JM, 2008, AUSTRALAS J EDUC TEC, V24, P387
[10]   Improving the authentic learning experience by integrating robots into the mixed-reality environment [J].
Chang, Chih-Wei ;
Lee, Jih-Hsien ;
Wang, Chin-Yeh ;
Chen, Gwo-Dong .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2010, 55 (04) :1572-1578