Time to Revision After Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

被引:4
|
作者
Miner, Samantha A. [1 ,3 ]
Martucci, John A. [2 ]
Brigido, Stephen A. [1 ]
DiDomenico, Lawrence [2 ]
机构
[1] Coordinated Hlth Lehigh Valley Hlth Network, Reconstruct Foot & Ankle Surg Fellowship, Bethlehem, PA USA
[2] NOMS Ankle & Foot Care Ctr, Reconstruct Rearfoot & Ankle Surg Fellowship, Youngstown, OH USA
[3] Coordinated Hlth Lehigh Valley Hlth Network, Reconstruct Foot & Ankle Surg Fellowship, 2775 Schoenersville Rd, Bethlehem, PA 18017 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY | 2023年 / 62卷 / 01期
关键词
deep infection; periprosthetic joint infection; revision; total ankle arthroplasty; total ankle replacement; RISK-FACTORS; SURVIVORSHIP ANALYSIS; LONG-TERM; REPLACEMENT; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1053/j.jfas.2022.09.001
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
While not a common complication after total ankle arthroplasty (TAA), periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) presents a significant risk of implant failure. The primary aim of this systematic review was to evaluate time to revision after PJI in patients who had undergone TAA. An extensive search strategy via electronic databases initially cap-tured 11,608 citations that were evaluated for relevance. Ultimately, 12 unique articles studying 3040 implants met inclusion criteria. The time to revision surgery due to PJI was recorded for each study and a weighted average obtained. The prevalence of PJI was 1.12% (n = 34). We found that the average time to revision due to PJI was 30.7 months, or approximately 2.6 years after the index TAA procedure. By literature definitions, the majority of cases (91.2%, n = 31) were beyond the "acute" PJI phase. The population was divided into 2 groups for further analysis of chronic infections. PJIs before the median were classified as "early" and those after as "late" chronic. The majority of cases (61.8%) were late chronic with an average time to revision of 44.3 months. A smaller number were early chronic (29.4%) with revision within 10.8 months. After summarizing the rates of infection and times to revision reported in the literature, we suggest modifying the current PJI classification to include early chronic and late chronic subgroups so that the total ankle surgeon is better prepared to prudently diagnose and treat PJIs.(c) 2022 by the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 190
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mycobacterium tuberculosis as a Cause of Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Review of the Literature
    Bi, Andrew S.
    Li, Daniel
    Ma, Yunlong
    Wu, Decheng
    Ma, Yuangzheng
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (03)
  • [32] Isothermal microcalorimetry improves accuracy and time to bacterial detection of periprosthetic joint infection after total joint arthroplasty
    Cichos, Kyle H.
    Ruark, Randall J.
    Ghanem, Elie S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2023, 61 (12)
  • [33] Application of machine learning in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
    Chong, Yuk Yee
    Chan, Ping Keung
    Chan, Vincent Wai Kwan
    Cheung, Amy
    Luk, Michelle Hilda
    Cheung, Man Hong
    Fu, Henry
    Chiu, Kwong Yuen
    ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 5 (01)
  • [34] A Shorter Interval Between Preoperative Corticosteroid Injection and Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Increases the Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Revision Operation: A Systematic Review
    Akhtar, Muzammil
    Razick, Daniel
    Asad, Shaheryar
    Baig, Osamah
    Saeed, Ali
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2024, 239 (05) : S323 - S323
  • [35] Prosthesis design of animal models of periprosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review
    Jie, Ke
    Deng, Peng
    Cao, Houran
    Feng, Wenjun
    Chen, Jinlun
    Zeng, Yirong
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (10):
  • [36] Arthroplasty-center related retrospective analysis of risk factors for Periprosthetic Joint Infection after primary and after revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Radtke, Kerstin
    Tetzlaff, T.
    Vaske, B.
    Ettinger, M.
    Claassen, L.
    Floerkemeier, T.
    Windhagen, H.
    von Lewinski, G.
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2016, 24 (05) : 721 - 728
  • [37] Application of machine learning in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
    Yuk Yee Chong
    Ping Keung Chan
    Vincent Wai Kwan Chan
    Amy Cheung
    Michelle Hilda Luk
    Man Hong Cheung
    Henry Fu
    Kwong Yuen Chiu
    Arthroplasty, 5
  • [38] Preoperative Opioids Increase the Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Joint Arthroplasty
    Bell, Kerri L.
    Shohat, Noam
    Goswami, Karan
    Tan, Timothy L.
    Kalbian, Irene
    Parvizi, Javad
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (10): : 3246 - +
  • [39] Tranexamic Acid Reduces the Rate of Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Aseptic Revision Arthroplasty
    Klement, Mitchell R.
    Padua, Fortunato G.
    Li, William T.
    Detweiler, Max
    Parvizi, Javad
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2020, 102 (15): : 1344 - 1350
  • [40] Two-stage revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection following total hip arthroplasty
    Fowler, Timothy J.
    Sayers, Adrian
    Whitehouse, Michael R.
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2019, 7