Time to Revision After Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

被引:4
|
作者
Miner, Samantha A. [1 ,3 ]
Martucci, John A. [2 ]
Brigido, Stephen A. [1 ]
DiDomenico, Lawrence [2 ]
机构
[1] Coordinated Hlth Lehigh Valley Hlth Network, Reconstruct Foot & Ankle Surg Fellowship, Bethlehem, PA USA
[2] NOMS Ankle & Foot Care Ctr, Reconstruct Rearfoot & Ankle Surg Fellowship, Youngstown, OH USA
[3] Coordinated Hlth Lehigh Valley Hlth Network, Reconstruct Foot & Ankle Surg Fellowship, 2775 Schoenersville Rd, Bethlehem, PA 18017 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY | 2023年 / 62卷 / 01期
关键词
deep infection; periprosthetic joint infection; revision; total ankle arthroplasty; total ankle replacement; RISK-FACTORS; SURVIVORSHIP ANALYSIS; LONG-TERM; REPLACEMENT; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1053/j.jfas.2022.09.001
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
While not a common complication after total ankle arthroplasty (TAA), periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) presents a significant risk of implant failure. The primary aim of this systematic review was to evaluate time to revision after PJI in patients who had undergone TAA. An extensive search strategy via electronic databases initially cap-tured 11,608 citations that were evaluated for relevance. Ultimately, 12 unique articles studying 3040 implants met inclusion criteria. The time to revision surgery due to PJI was recorded for each study and a weighted average obtained. The prevalence of PJI was 1.12% (n = 34). We found that the average time to revision due to PJI was 30.7 months, or approximately 2.6 years after the index TAA procedure. By literature definitions, the majority of cases (91.2%, n = 31) were beyond the "acute" PJI phase. The population was divided into 2 groups for further analysis of chronic infections. PJIs before the median were classified as "early" and those after as "late" chronic. The majority of cases (61.8%) were late chronic with an average time to revision of 44.3 months. A smaller number were early chronic (29.4%) with revision within 10.8 months. After summarizing the rates of infection and times to revision reported in the literature, we suggest modifying the current PJI classification to include early chronic and late chronic subgroups so that the total ankle surgeon is better prepared to prudently diagnose and treat PJIs.(c) 2022 by the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 190
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk of Instability After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection
    Menken, Luke G.
    Berliner, Zachary P.
    Korshunov, Yevgeniy
    Cooper, H. John
    Hepinstall, Matthew S.
    Scuderi, Giles R.
    Rodriguez, Jose A.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2022, 45 (03) : 145 - +
  • [2] Fungal periprosthetic joint infection in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
    Jakobs, Oliver
    Schoof, Benjamin
    Klatte, Till Orla
    Schmidl, Stefan
    Fensky, Florian
    Guenther, Daniel
    Frommelt, Lars
    Gehrke, Thorsten
    Gebauer, Matthias
    ORTHOPEDIC REVIEWS, 2015, 7 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [3] Quantifying the Burden of Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Infection
    Kamath, Atul F.
    Ong, Kevin L.
    Lau, Edmund
    Chan, Vanessa
    Vail, Thomas P.
    Rubash, Harry E.
    Berry, Daniel J.
    Bozic, Kevin J.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2015, 30 (09): : 1492 - 1497
  • [4] Periprosthetic joint infection in aseptic total hip arthroplasty revision
    Renard, Guillaume
    Laffosse, Jean-Michel
    Tibbo, Meagan
    Lucena, Thibault
    Cavaignac, Etienne
    Rouvillain, Jean-Louis
    Chiron, Philippe
    Severyns, Mathieu
    Reina, Nicolas
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2020, 44 (04) : 735 - 741
  • [5] Periprosthetic joint infection in aseptic total hip arthroplasty revision
    Guillaume Renard
    Jean-Michel Laffosse
    Meagan Tibbo
    Thibault Lucena
    Etienne Cavaignac
    Jean-Louis Rouvillain
    Philippe Chiron
    Mathieu Severyns
    Nicolas Reina
    International Orthopaedics, 2020, 44 : 735 - 741
  • [6] Risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection after total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhu, Y.
    Zhang, F.
    Chen, W.
    Liu, S.
    Zhang, Q.
    Zhang, Y.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2015, 89 (02) : 82 - 89
  • [7] Outcomes in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection after shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review
    Nelson, Gregory N.
    Davis, Daniel E.
    Namdari, Surena
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2016, 25 (08) : 1337 - 1345
  • [8] Diagnosis and Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infections After Total Ankle Arthroplasty
    Atesok, Kivanc
    Scott, Daniel J.
    Hurwitz, Shepard
    Gross, Christopher E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2024, 32 (16) : 728 - 737
  • [9] The Economics of Revision Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection
    Roof, Mackenzie A.
    Aggarwal, Vinay K.
    Schwarzkopf, Ran
    ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2023, 23
  • [10] A review of current practices in periprosthetic joint infection debridement and revision arthroplasty
    Mian, Humza M.
    Lyons, Joseph G.
    Perrin, Joshua
    Froehle, Andrew W.
    Krishnamurthy, Anil B.
    ARTHROPLASTY, 2022, 4 (01)