Retrospective Evaluation of Moderate Sedation Visits That Used Oral Meperidine and Hydroxyzine With Oral or Intranasal Midazolam

被引:0
作者
Jain, Gaurav [1 ]
Curran, Ronald [1 ]
Jones, Robert S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Sch Dent, Div Pediat Dent, Dept Surg & Dev Sci, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
behavior guidance; sedation; pediatric dentistry; meperidine; hydroxyzine; midazolam; intranasal; CHLORAL HYDRATE; NITROUS-OXIDE; PHARMACOKINETICS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; DEXMEDETOMIDINE; FORMULATION; SUCCESS; EVENTS; NASAL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To examine the influence of substituting intranasal (IN) midazolam (MID) for oral ( PO) MID, within the three-drug combination of meperidine ( MEP), hydroxyzine (H) and MID, on sedation treatment outcomes. Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis examined patient variables and sedation outcomes in 508 pediatric dental patients sedated by single- and multi-drug seda-tion regimens (MEP-H; MEP-H-(PO)-MID; MEP-H-(IN)-MID; single-agent MID). The outcome assessment examined sedation visit effectiveness, sedation treatment completion, treatment time and medication administration to discharge time. Multi-variable logistic regression analyses assessed predictive variables associated with sedation visit effectiveness. Results: Both three-drug combinations (MEP-H-(PO)-MID; MEP-H-(IN)-MID) were used for behavior guidance in children of a similar age (median age=7.1 and 6.5 years, respectively, for the two drug combinations) and weight (median weight = 23.7 and 23.5 kg, respectively, for the two drug combinations). These three-drug com-binations had a higher likelihood of sedation effectiveness over the reference sedation regimen of single-agent midazolam ( MEP-H-(PO)-MID adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 2.65; 95 percent confidence interval [95% CI]=1.09 to 6.45; P=0.032; and MEP-H(IN)- MID OR=2.08; 95% CI=1.03 to 4.18; P=0.039). MEP-H-(IN)MID was asso-ciated with a shorter medication administration to discharge time for patients by 23 minutes (interquartile range [IQR]=9.5 to 34 minutes) compared to MEP- H-(PO) MID (P<0.05) while providing a comparable number of teeth treated (median=five). All sedation drug regimens, including MEP-H-(IN)MID, had high levels of oxygen saturation during all sedation appointments. Conclusion: Substituting IN for PO MID in MEP- H-MID was associated with a shorter total time to discharge while demonstrating comparable efficacy during sedation. ( J Dent Child 2023;90(3):139-46)
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 146
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   PREMEDICATION WITH MIDAZOLAM IN CHILDREN - EFFECT OF INTRANASAL, RECTAL AND ORAL ROUTES ON PLASMA MIDAZOLAM CONCENTRATIONS [J].
MALINOVSKY, JM ;
POPULAIRE, C ;
COZIAN, A ;
LEPAGE, JY ;
LEJUS, C ;
PINAUD, M .
ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 50 (04) :351-354
[42]   Jet injector compared with oral midazolam for preoperative sedation in children [J].
Fine, B ;
Castillo, R ;
McDonald, T ;
Paisansathan, C ;
Zsigmond, E ;
Hoffman, WE .
PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2004, 14 (09) :739-743
[43]   Post-Discharge Effects and Parents' Opinions of Intranasal Fentanyl with Oral Midazolam Sedation in Pediatric Dental Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study [J].
Alhaidari, Roaa I. ;
AlSarheed, Maha A. .
CHILDREN-BASEL, 2022, 9 (02)
[44]   Comparison of sedation by intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral chloral hydrate for pediatric ophthalmic examination [J].
Cao, Qianzhong ;
Lin, Yiquan ;
Xie, Zhubin ;
Shen, Weihua ;
Chen, Ying ;
Gan, Xiaoliang ;
Liu, Yizhi .
PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2017, 27 (06) :629-636
[45]   A randomized controlled trial of oral chloral hydrate vs intranasal dexmedetomidine plus buccal midazolam for auditory brainstem response testing in children [J].
Li, Bi L. ;
Yuen, Vivian M. ;
Zhou, Jia L. ;
Zhang, Na ;
Huang, Jun X. ;
Tian, Hang ;
Song, Xing R. .
PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2018, 28 (11) :1022-1028
[46]   Oral clonidine pre-treatment and diazepam/meperidine sedation [J].
Hall, D. L. ;
Tatakis, D. N. ;
Walters, J. D. ;
Rezvan, E. .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2006, 85 (09) :854-858
[47]   Oral sedation with midazolam and diphenhydramine compared with midazolam alone in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Cengiz, M ;
Baysal, Z ;
Ganidagli, S .
PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2006, 16 (06) :621-626
[48]   Comparative Study of the Effect of Oral Chloral Hydrate and Intranasal Fentanyl on Sedation in Children for Electroencephalography [J].
Shaf, Amir ;
Khodarahmi, Amir ;
Shahhosseini, Sedighe .
IRANIAN JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2023, 17 (03) :97-105
[49]   Costs of sedation using oral midazolam: Money, time, and parental attitudes [J].
Nelson, DS ;
Hoagland, JR ;
Kunkel, NC .
PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2000, 16 (02) :80-84
[50]   Intranasal Fentanyl Combined with Oral Midazolam for Pediatric Dental Sedation: A Controlled Randomized Blinded Crossover Clinical Trial [J].
Alhaidari, Roaa, I ;
AlSarheed, Maha ;
Sheta, Saad A. ;
Aldhubaiban, Mohammed .
PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2022, 44 (04) :255-260