Retrospective Evaluation of Moderate Sedation Visits That Used Oral Meperidine and Hydroxyzine With Oral or Intranasal Midazolam

被引:0
作者
Jain, Gaurav [1 ]
Curran, Ronald [1 ]
Jones, Robert S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Sch Dent, Div Pediat Dent, Dept Surg & Dev Sci, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
behavior guidance; sedation; pediatric dentistry; meperidine; hydroxyzine; midazolam; intranasal; CHLORAL HYDRATE; NITROUS-OXIDE; PHARMACOKINETICS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; DEXMEDETOMIDINE; FORMULATION; SUCCESS; EVENTS; NASAL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To examine the influence of substituting intranasal (IN) midazolam (MID) for oral ( PO) MID, within the three-drug combination of meperidine ( MEP), hydroxyzine (H) and MID, on sedation treatment outcomes. Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis examined patient variables and sedation outcomes in 508 pediatric dental patients sedated by single- and multi-drug seda-tion regimens (MEP-H; MEP-H-(PO)-MID; MEP-H-(IN)-MID; single-agent MID). The outcome assessment examined sedation visit effectiveness, sedation treatment completion, treatment time and medication administration to discharge time. Multi-variable logistic regression analyses assessed predictive variables associated with sedation visit effectiveness. Results: Both three-drug combinations (MEP-H-(PO)-MID; MEP-H-(IN)-MID) were used for behavior guidance in children of a similar age (median age=7.1 and 6.5 years, respectively, for the two drug combinations) and weight (median weight = 23.7 and 23.5 kg, respectively, for the two drug combinations). These three-drug com-binations had a higher likelihood of sedation effectiveness over the reference sedation regimen of single-agent midazolam ( MEP-H-(PO)-MID adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 2.65; 95 percent confidence interval [95% CI]=1.09 to 6.45; P=0.032; and MEP-H(IN)- MID OR=2.08; 95% CI=1.03 to 4.18; P=0.039). MEP-H-(IN)MID was asso-ciated with a shorter medication administration to discharge time for patients by 23 minutes (interquartile range [IQR]=9.5 to 34 minutes) compared to MEP- H-(PO) MID (P<0.05) while providing a comparable number of teeth treated (median=five). All sedation drug regimens, including MEP-H-(IN)MID, had high levels of oxygen saturation during all sedation appointments. Conclusion: Substituting IN for PO MID in MEP- H-MID was associated with a shorter total time to discharge while demonstrating comparable efficacy during sedation. ( J Dent Child 2023;90(3):139-46)
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 146
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A comparison of oral midazolam and ketamine with oral midazolam and promethazine in paediatric sedation
    Bozorgi, Farzad
    Gholikhatir, Iraj
    Mousavi, Seyed Jaber
    Rahiminejad, Mahsa
    Lali, Abolghasem
    MEDICAL STUDIES-STUDIA MEDYCZNE, 2021, 37 (01) : 33 - 41
  • [22] Oral sedation in dentistry: evaluation of professional practice of oral hydroxyzine in the University Hospital of Rennes, France
    A. Pouliquen
    E. Boyer
    J.-L. Sixou
    S. B. Fong
    A. Marie-Cousin
    V. Meuric
    European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, 2021, 22 : 801 - 811
  • [23] A comparison of oral diazepam versus midazolam, administered with intravenous meperidine, as premedication to sedation for pediatric endoscopy
    Martinez, JL
    Sutters, KA
    Waite, S
    Davis, J
    Medina, E
    Montano, N
    Merzel, D
    Marquez, C
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 2002, 35 (01) : 51 - 58
  • [24] Intranasal esketamine combined with oral midazolam provides adequate sedation for outpatient pediatric dental procedures: a prospective cohort study
    Wang, Jing
    Zeng, Jie
    Zhao, Nan
    Chen, Silu
    Chen, Zhong
    Liao, Jingrong
    Ran, Haosong
    Yu, Cong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 109 (07) : 1893 - 1899
  • [25] Comparison of Oral Midazolam and Triclofos in Conscious Sedation of Uncooperative Children
    Shabbir, A.
    Bhat, S. S.
    Hegde, Sundeep
    Salman, M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2011, 36 (02) : 189 - 196
  • [26] Intravenous sedation with midazolam in oral surgery and implantology procedures A retrospective study
    Obreja, Karina
    Begic, Amira
    Kallab, Sandra
    Ruesseler, Miriam
    Bepler, Lena
    Sader, Robert
    Schwarz, Frank
    Parvini, Puria
    IMPLANTOLOGIE, 2022, 30 (03): : 313 - 324
  • [27] Oral chloral hydrate vs. intranasal midazolam for sedation during computerized tomography
    Razieh Fallah
    Mohammad Hosein Ataee Nakhaei
    Shekofah Behdad
    Reza Nafisi Moghaddam
    Ali Shamszadeh
    Indian Pediatrics, 2013, 50 : 233 - 235
  • [28] Oral chloral hydrate vs. intranasal midazolam for sedation during computerized tomography
    Fallah, Razieh
    Nakhaei, Mohammad Hosein Ataee
    Behdad, Shekofah
    Moghaddam, Reza Nafisi
    Shamszadeh, Ali
    INDIAN PEDIATRICS, 2013, 50 (02) : 233 - 235
  • [29] Preanesthetic medication in children: A comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus oral midazolam
    Ghali, Ashraf M.
    Mahfouz, Abdul Kader
    Al-Bahrani, Maher
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 5 (04) : 387 - 391
  • [30] The Physiologic and Behavioral Effects of Oral and Intranasal Midazolam in Pediatric Dental Patients
    Johnson, Erin
    Briskie, Daniel
    Majewski, Robert
    Edwards, Sean
    Reynolds, Paul
    PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2010, 32 (03) : 229 - 238