Crime, Incarceration, and Dementia: An Aging Criminal System

被引:2
作者
Arias, Jalayne J. [1 ]
Morgado, Lillian [1 ]
Tyler, Ana [2 ]
机构
[1] Georgia State Univ, Atlanta, GA 30302 USA
[2] UCSF, Memory & Aging Ctr, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
Aging; dementia; criminal justice; ethics; Alzheimer's disease; INTER-AMERICAN COURT;
D O I
10.1017/amj.2023.27
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Dementia within the criminal system, from arrest through incarceration, has been largely ignored. While the health system has begun grappling with the chronic conditions that will accompany an aging society, the criminal system has yet to meaningfully respond. Dementia is a clinical syndrome characterized by impairment in cognitive domains (memory, executive function, visuospatial). Additionally, dementia often includes behavioral symptoms that increase the likelihood that an individual's actions may violate social norms and in some circumstances be deemed criminal. Prior studies have established criminal behavior as a trend among individuals living with dementia. Yet, the criminal system has yet to establish protections for individuals who commit a crime while impaired by dementia. This paper will report on an empirical study to evaluate the treatment of persons with dementia within the criminal justice system. We will report on interviews with attorneys (n=15) regarding their experience and perspective on the treatment of persons with dementia post-arrest. In the paper, we will explore topics identified through these interviews including pre-trial release, competency, placement (housing), criminal liability determination, sentencing, and post-conviction release. We will highlight key findings including the lack of a systematic screening process for dementia post-arrest, placement is a significant challenge, attorneys' lack of training on dementia to be able to understand how the disease could impact decision-making, and the two legal mechanisms available to divert miss the mark given their focus on psychiatric populations. We will use these data and findings to argue for a research and policy agenda to address a gap in legal policies to appropriately manage persons with dementia post-arrest.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 204
页数:12
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Achurra Maria Elisa Zavala, 2020, REV FAC DERECHO, V48, P9
[2]  
Albert R, 2014, BOSTON U LAW REV, V94, P1029
[3]  
Alvarado Paola Andrea Acosta, 2014, CASO INTERAMERICANO, V38
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Almonacid Arellano y otros v. Chile, Excepciones Preliminares, Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas, Sentencia, Corte IDH (ser. C)
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Gelman v. Uruguay. Fondo y Reparaciones, Sentencia
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Colindres Schonenberg v. El Salvador, Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas, Sentencia, Corte IDH
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Petro Urrego v. Colombia, Excepciones Preliminares, Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas, Sentencia, Corte IDH
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Trabajadores Cesados del Congreso (Aguado Alfaro y otros) vs
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Ordenes Guerra y otros v. Chile, Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas, Sentencia, Corte IDH (ser. C) No. 37241
[10]  
Barak Aharon, 2005, PURPOSIVE INTERPRETA, P372