Using immersive virtual reality in testing empathy type for adolescents

被引:2
作者
Kim, Eunha [1 ]
Laine, Teemu H. [1 ,2 ]
Suk, Hae Jung [2 ]
Jo, Young Won [1 ]
机构
[1] Ajou Univ, Dept Psychol, 206 Worldcupro, Suwon, South Korea
[2] Ajou Univ, Dept Digital Media, 206 Worldcupro, Suwon, South Korea
关键词
Virtual reality; Empathy type; Adolescents; Validity; Assessment; SYMPATHY; EMOTIONS; OTHERS;
D O I
10.1007/s12144-023-05534-9
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Empathy is an important aspect of human interaction that helps individuals form meaningful relationships and connect with others. Although levels of empathy have been measured using paper-pencil tests, there are no tools to identify the different types of empathy. The current study aimed to develop and validate the Virtual Reality Empathy Test (VRET), which was designed to identify adolescent empathy types. The types of empathy were developed based on three pairs of dimensions (cognitive versus affective empathy, positive versus negative empathy, and majority versus minority empathy). VRET consists of three virtual scenarios that include positive and negative situations (e.g., winning a gold medal or losing in the first round of a badminton tournament). As each scenario progressed, the participants were asked to answer 13 questions during the first and second scenarios, and eight questions during the third scenario. The VRET was administered to 90 South Korean high school students. Hypothesized differences between existing empathy scales and VRET results were found, indicating a high convergent and discriminant validity. VRET, as a unique test of empathy type, can be a valuable tool to assist adolescents in developing a balanced sense of empathy.
引用
收藏
页码:16183 / 16197
页数:15
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   The Effect of Embodied Experience on Self-Other Merging Attitude, and Helping Behaviour [J].
Ahn, Sun Joo ;
Amanda Minh Tran Le ;
Bailenson, Jeremy .
MEDIA PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 16 (01) :7-38
[2]   Empathy Development in Adolescence Predicts Social Competencies in Adulthood [J].
Allemand, Mathias ;
Steiger, Andrea E. ;
Fend, Helmut A. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2015, 83 (02) :229-241
[3]   Empathizing With Others' Pain Versus Empathizing With Others' Joy: Examining the Separability of Positive and Negative Empathy and Their Relation to Different Types of Social Behaviors and Social Emotions [J].
Andreychik, Michael R. ;
Migliaccio, Nicole .
BASIC AND APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 37 (05) :274-291
[4]   DISTRESS AND EMPATHY - 2 QUALITATIVELY DISTINCT VICARIOUS EMOTIONS WITH DIFFERENT MOTIVATIONAL CONSEQUENCES [J].
BATSON, CD ;
FULTZ, J ;
SCHOENRADE, PA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 1987, 55 (01) :19-39
[5]   Learning Empathy Through Simulation A Systematic Literature Review [J].
Bearman, Margaret ;
Palermo, Claire ;
Allen, Louise M. ;
Williams, Brett .
SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2015, 10 (05) :308-319
[6]   Responding to the emotions of others: Dissociating forms of empathy through the study of typical and psychiatric populations [J].
Blair, RJR .
CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2005, 14 (04) :698-718
[7]  
BRYANT BK, 1982, CHILD DEV, V53, P413, DOI 10.2307/1128984
[8]   Longitudinal Bidirectional Relations Between Adolescents' Sympathy and Prosocial Behavior [J].
Carlo, Gustavo ;
Padilla-Walker, Laura M. ;
Nielson, Matthew G. .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 51 (12) :1771-1777
[9]   EMPATHY AND SYMPATHY - THE IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE [J].
CHISMAR, D .
JOURNAL OF VALUE INQUIRY, 1988, 22 (04) :257-266
[10]  
DAVIS MH, 1983, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V44