Excess of lensing amplitude in the Planck CMB power spectrum

被引:2
作者
Mokeddem, Rahima [1 ]
Hipolito-Ricaldi, Wiliam S. [2 ,3 ]
Bernui, Armando [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Espirito Santo, PPGCosmo, CCE, Ave Fernando Ferrari 540, BR-2907591 Vitoria, ES, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Espirito Santo, Nucleo Cosmo UFES, Rodovia BR 101 Norte,Km 60, BR-29932540 Sao Mateus, ES, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Espirito Santo, Dept Ciencias Nat, Rodovia BR 101 Norte,Km 60, BR-29932540 Sao Mateus, ES, Brazil
[4] Observ Nacl, Rua Gen Jose Cristino 77, BR-20921400 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
来源
JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS | 2023年 / 01期
关键词
cosmological parameters from CMBR; CMBR experiments; MASSIVE NEUTRINOS; GROWTH-RATE; SCALE; ANISOTROPY;
D O I
10.1088/1475-7516/2023/01/017
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Precise measurements of the Planck cosmic microwave background (CMB) angular power spectrum (APS) at small angles have stimulated accurate statistical analyses of the lensing amplitude parameter A(L). To confirm if it satisfies the value expected by the flat-Lambda CDM concordance model, i.e. A(L) = 1, we investigate the spectrum difference obtained as the difference of the measured Planck CMB APS and the Planck best-fit Lambda CDM APS model. To know if this residual spectrum corresponds to statistical noise or if it has a hidden signature that can be accounted for with a larger lensing amplitude A(L) > 1, we apply the Ljung-Box statistical test and find, with high statistical significance, that the spectrum difference is not statistical noise. This spectrum difference is then analysed in detail using simulated APS, based on the Planck Lambda CDM best-fit model, where the lensing amplitude is a free parameter. We explore different binnations of the multipole order l and look for the best-fit lensing amplitude parameter that accounts for the spectrum difference in a chi(2) procedure. We find that there is an excess of signal that is well explained by a Lambda CDM APS with a non-null lensing amplitude parameter A(lens), with values in the interval [0.10, 0.29] at 68% confidence level. Furthermore, the lensing parameter in the Planck APS should be 1 + A(lens) > 1 at similar to 3 sigma of statistical confidence. Additionally, we perform statistical tests that confirm the robustness of this result. Important to say that this excess of lensing amplitude, not accounted in the Planck's flat-Lambda CDM model, could have an impact on the theoretical expectation of large-scale structures formation once the scales where it was detected correspond to these matter clustering processes.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [11] Can a primordial magnetic field originate large-scale anomalies in WMAP data?
    Bernui, A.
    Hipolito-Ricaldi, W. S.
    [J]. MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2008, 389 (03) : 1453 - 1460
  • [12] North-South non-Gaussian asymmetry in Planck CMB maps
    Bernui, A.
    Oliveira, A. F.
    Pereira, T. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2014, (10):
  • [13] Mapping the large-angle deviation from Gaussianity in simulated CMB maps
    Bernui, A.
    Reboucas, M. J.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2012, 85 (02)
  • [14] Observational constraints on Starobinsky f (R) cosmology from cosmic expansion and structure growth data
    Bessa, P.
    Campista, M.
    Bernui, A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C, 2022, 82 (06):
  • [15] Constraints on Cosmological Parameters from the 500 deg2 SPTPOL Lensing Power Spectrum
    Bianchini, F.
    Wu, W. L. K.
    Ade, P. A. R.
    Anderson, A. J.
    Austermann, J. E.
    Avva, J. S.
    Beall, J. A.
    Bender, A. N.
    Benson, B. A.
    Bleem, L. E.
    Carlstrom, J. E.
    Chang, C. L.
    Chaubal, P.
    Chiang, H. C.
    Citron, R.
    Moran, C. Corbett
    Crawford, T. M.
    Crites, A. T.
    de Haan, T.
    Dobbs, M. A.
    Everett, W.
    Gallicchio, J.
    George, E. M.
    Gilbert, A.
    Gupta, N.
    Halverson, N. W.
    Harrington, N.
    Henning, J. W.
    Hilton, G. C.
    Holder, G. P.
    Holzapfel, W. L.
    Hrubes, J. D.
    Huang, N.
    Hubmayr, J.
    Irwin, K. D.
    Knox, L.
    Lee, A. T.
    Li, D.
    Lowitz, A.
    Manzotti, A.
    McMahon, J. J.
    Meyer, S. S.
    Millea, M.
    Mocanu, L. M.
    Montgomery, J.
    Nadolski, A.
    Natoli, T.
    Nibarger, J. P.
    Noble, G.
    Novosad, V.
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 888 (02)
  • [16] The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS). Part II: Approximation schemes
    Blas, Diego
    Lesgourgues, Julien
    Tram, Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2011, (07):
  • [17] BOND JR, 1980, PHYS REV LETT, V45, P1980, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.1980
  • [18] Box GE., 1970, J AM STAT ASSOC, V65, P1509
  • [19] Cosmic microwave weak lensing data as a test for the dark universe
    Calabrese, Erminia
    Slosar, Anze
    Melchiorri, Alessandro
    Smoot, George F.
    Zahn, Oliver
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2008, 77 (12):
  • [20] Lack-of-correlation anomaly in CMB large scale polarisation maps
    Chiocchetta, C.
    Gruppuso, A.
    Lattanzi, M.
    Natoli, P.
    Pagano, L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2021, (08):