Comparative analysis of platelet depleted plasma prepared on the Roche 8100 automation line and manually centrifuged platelet poor plasma for routine coagulation assays

被引:1
作者
Barbhuiya, Mustafa A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Livingston, Ron [1 ,2 ]
Baranoski, Sue [1 ,2 ]
Creer, Michael H. [1 ,2 ]
Oladipo, Olajumoke [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Coll Med, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Mail Code H160,500 Univ Dr, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
[2] Milton S Hershey Med Ctr, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
[3] UMass Chan Med Sch Baystate, Dept Pathol, Baysrate Med Ctr, Springfield, MA 01199 USA
[4] UMASS Chan Med Sch Baystate, Dept Healthcare Delivery & Populat Sci, Springfield, MA 01199 USA
[5] Fdn Advancement Essential Diagnost, South Hadley, MA 01075 USA
[6] Univ Massachusetts, Med Sch Baystate, Baystate Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, 759 Chestnut St,Room C1173, Springfield, MA 01199 USA
关键词
Hematology; Coagulation; Pre-analytical automation; Prothrombin Time; Antithrombin; D-Dimer; Fibrinogen; Laboratory automation;
D O I
10.1016/j.plabm.2023.e00324
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate whether the routine coagulation tests can be performed using platelet depleted plasma (PDP, residual platelet count <40000/mu L) to achieve maximum efficiency of the automated workflow and compare results of these tests performed with platelet poor plasma (PPP residual platelet count <10,000/mu L) prepared manually 'offline'. Design and Methods: The PDP was obtained first following 'on line' centrifugation at 4150 RPM (3000g) for 7 min. The routine coagulation tests, Prothrombin Time (PT), Activated Partial Thromboplastin Clotting Time (aPTT), D-dimer (DD), Antithrombin III (AT3) and Fibrinogen (FBG) were performed. The PPP was obtained from an aliquot of PDP samples with additional 'manual off line' centrifugation at 7700 RPM (3314g) for 3 min (total 10 min, online + offline) and the same tests were performed. The statistical analysis was carried out using EP Evaluator v11 to compare results from both methods. Results: The results from both PPP and PDP samples demonstrated strong correlation. For example, PT (R = 0.9989; N = 55, and of Bias -0.12 ( 0.67%), aPTT(R = 0.9957; N = 60, Bias 0.26 (0.58%)), AT3(R = 0.9800; N = 49, Bias -2.0 ( -2.2%)), FBG (R = 0.9956; N = 57, Bias -1.9 ( 0.5%)) and DD (R = 0.9981; N = 38, Bias 0.005 (0.373%)) with insignificant bias. Conclusions: The utilization of the Roche cobas (R) 8100 automated 'online' centrifugation helps achieve optimal workflow efficiency without impacting analytical performance of the PT, aPTT, DD, AT3 and FBG assays. The use of PDP can be superior method to PPP for routine coagulation tests.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
Azlin I, 2011, MED HEALTH-KUALA LUM, V6, P68
[2]  
Barnes P.W., 2002, LAB HEMATOL, V8, P205
[3]  
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2009, Collection, Transport, and Processing of Blood Specimens for Testing Plasma-Based Coagulation Assays and Molecular Hemostasis Assays
[4]  
Approved Guideline H21-A5, Vfifth, P5
[5]   Pre-analytical issues in the haemostasis laboratory: Guidance for the clinical laboratories [J].
Magnette A. ;
Chatelain M. ;
Chatelain B. ;
Ten Cate H. ;
Mullier F. .
Thrombosis Journal, 14 (1)
[6]  
PAPPAS AA, 1991, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V115, P816
[7]  
Sultan A., 2010, Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, V16, P233