A novel modified endoscopic method for treating patients with refractory gastro-esophageal disease and moderate hiatus hernia

被引:4
作者
Gao, Su -Jun [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Zhen [1 ]
Zhang, Li [1 ]
Yin, Jian [1 ]
Ni, Xiu-Fan [1 ]
Chen, Lei [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Yangzhou Univ, Northern Jiangsu Peoples Hosp, Clin Collage, Digest Dept, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Suchow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Digest Dept, Suzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Yangzhou Univ, Northern Jiangsu Peoples Hosp, Clin Coll, Digest Dept, 98 West Nantong Rd, Yangzhou 225001, Peoples R China
关键词
Anti-reflux mucosectomy; Hiatus hernia; Endoscopic mucosal resection; Gastroesophageal reflux;
D O I
10.17235/reed.2023.9422/2022
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and aim: endoscopic anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) is effective for patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (rGERD) with small hiatus hernia. However, evidence of its applicability in patients with larger hernia sac is lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency and safety of ARMS for patients with rGERD with moderate hiatus hernia (3-5 cm) and determine the appropriate resection range.Methods: thirty-six patients with rGERD with moderate hiatus hernia were enrolled. They were divided into 2/3 and 3/4 circumferential mucosal resection groups. The patients received modified ARMS. The gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GERD-Q) and DeMeester scores, endoscopy, 24-h pH monitoring results and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resting pressure were com-pared pre-and post-procedure. Therapeutic effects and complications of the two mucosal resection ranges were analyzed.Results: thirty-six patients were enrolled in this study, all of whom had undergone ARMS surgery with at least six-month follow-up. In the 2/3 circumferential mucosal resection group, the GERD-Q score, acid exposure time (AET) and DeMeester score improved significantly compared with those before surgery (p < 0.001). In the 3/4 circumferential mucosal resection group, the GERD-Q score, AET and De-Meeter score worsened after six months (p < 0.001), but there was no difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). In both groups, there was no significant improvement in the ratio of esophagitis grade C/D and LES resting pressure after treatment compared with the baseline values (p > 0.05), and no postoperative bleeding or perforation was observed. The incidence of postoperative esophageal stenosis in the 2/3 circumferential mucosal resection group was lower than that in the 3/4 circumferential mucosal resection group (p = 0.041). Conclusion: modified ARMS is effective for patients with rGERD with moderate hiatus hernia, but it cannot significantly increase the postoperative resting pressure of the LES. The 2/3 circumferential mucosal resection can reduce the incidence of postoperative esophageal stenosis.
引用
收藏
页码:496 / 503
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Impaired Upper Esophageal Sphincter Reflexes in Patients With Supraesophageal Reflux Disease [J].
Babaei, Arash ;
Venu, Mukund ;
Naini, Sohrab Rahimi ;
Gonzaga, Jason ;
Lang, Ivan M. ;
Massey, Benson T. ;
Jadcherla, Sudarshan ;
Shaker, Reza .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 149 (06) :1381-1391
[2]   Lesion size and circumferential range identified as independent risk factors for esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection [J].
Chen, Meihong ;
Dang, Yini ;
Ding, Chao ;
Yang, Jiajia ;
Si, Xinmin ;
Zhang, Guoxin .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (09) :4065-4071
[3]   Refractory GERD: What is it? [J].
Fass R. ;
Gasiorowska A. .
Current Gastroenterology Reports, 2008, 10 (3) :252-257
[4]   Comparison of oesophageal function tests between Chinese non-erosive reflux disease and reflux hypersensitivity patients [J].
Gao, Feng ;
Gao, Yan ;
Chen, Xue ;
Qian, Jie ;
Zhang, Jie .
BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 17
[5]   Surgical and endoscopic management options for patients with GERD based on proton pump inhibitor symptom response: recommendations from an expert US panel [J].
Gawron, Andrew J. ;
Bell, Reginald ;
Abu Dayyeh, Barham K. ;
Buckley, F. P. ;
Chang, Kenneth ;
Dunst, Christy M. ;
Edmundowicz, Steven A. ;
Jobe, Blair ;
Lipham, John C. ;
Lister, Dan ;
Canto, Marcia Irene ;
Smith, Michael S. ;
Starpoli, Anthony A. ;
Triadafilopoulos, George ;
Watson, Thomas J. ;
Wilson, Erik ;
Pandolfino, John E. ;
Kaizer, Alexander ;
Van De Voorde, Zoe ;
Yadlapati, Rena .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 92 (01) :78-+
[6]   Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus [J].
Gyawali, C. Prakash ;
Kahrilas, Peter J. ;
Savarino, Edoardo ;
Zerbib, Frank ;
Mion, Francois ;
Smout, Andre J. P. M. ;
Vaezi, Michael ;
Sifrim, Daniel ;
Fox, Mark R. ;
Vela, Marcelo F. ;
Tutuian, Radu ;
Tack, Jan ;
Bredenoord, Albert J. ;
Pandolfino, John ;
Roman, Sabine .
GUT, 2018, 67 (07) :1351-1362
[7]   First Experience with Banded Anti-reflux Mucosectomy (ARMS) for GERD: Feasibility, Safety, and Technique (with Video) [J].
Hedberg, Herbert Mason ;
Kuchta, Kristine ;
Ujiki, Michael B. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2019, 23 (06) :1274-1278
[8]  
Inoue H, 2014, ANN GASTROENTEROL, V27, P346
[9]   Endoscopic management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: Panacea for proton pump inhibitors dependent/refractory patients [J].
Kalapala, Rakesh ;
Singla, Neeraj ;
Reddy, Duvvur Nageshwar .
DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 34 (04) :687-699
[10]   Mucosal loss as a critical factor in esophageal stricture formation after mucosal resection: a pilot experiment in a porcine model [J].
Liu, Bing-Rong ;
Liu, Dan ;
Yang, Wenyi ;
Ullah, Saif ;
Cao, Zhen ;
He, Dezhi ;
Zhang, Xuehui ;
Shi, Yang ;
Zhou, Yangyang ;
Chen, Yong ;
He, Donghai ;
Zhao, Lixia ;
Yuan, Yulian ;
Li, Deliang .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (02) :551-556