Access to care and satisfaction with care among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries by level of care need

被引:2
作者
Park, Sungchul [1 ,2 ]
Chung, Wankyo [3 ]
Stimpson, Jim P. [4 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Coll Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, 145 Anam Ro, Seoul 02841, South Korea
[2] Korea Univ, FOUR R&E Ctr Learning Hlth Syst BK21, 145 Anam-ro, Seoul 02841, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, 1 Gwanak Ro, Seoul 08826, South Korea
[4] Drexel Univ, Dornsife Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Management & Policy, 3215 Market St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Medicare; Care need; Disability; Care access; Care satisfaction; COST; QUALITY; INTENSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.dhjo.2022.101402
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Variation among fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare beneficiaries by level of care need for access to care and satisfaction with care is unknown. Objective: We examined access to care and satisfaction with care among FFS Medicare beneficiaries by level of care need.Methods: We employed a cross-sectional study design. Using the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, we categorized 17,967 FFS Medicare beneficiaries into six groups based on level of care need: the rela-tively healthy (11.0%), those with simple chronic conditions (26.1%), those with minor complex chronic conditions (28.6%), those with major complex chronic conditions (14.2%), the frail (6.2%), and the non -elderly disabled or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (13.9%). Outcome measures included multiple in-dicators for access to care and satisfaction with care. For each outcome, we conducted a linear probability model while adjusting for individual-level and county-level characteristics and estimated the adjusted value of the outcome by level of care need.Results: The non-elderly disabled or ESRD were more likely to experience limited access to care and poor satisfaction with care than other five care need groups. Particularly, the rates of reporting trouble accessing needed medical care were the highest among the non-elderly disabled or ESRD (12.4% [95% CI: 9.6-15.3] vs. 2.1 [95% CI: 1.5-2.8] to 2.5 [95% CI: 1.6-3.5]). The leading reason for trouble accessing needed care among the non-elderly disabled or ESRD was attributable to affordability (59.6%).Conclusions: Policymakers need to develop targeted approaches to improve access to care and satis-faction with care for the non-elderly with a disability or ESRD.(c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[21]   Subgroups of High-Cost Medicare Advantage Patients: an Observational Study [J].
Powers, Brian W. ;
Yan, Jiali ;
Zhu, Jingsan ;
Linn, Kristin A. ;
Jain, Sachin H. ;
Kowalski, Jennifer L. ;
Navathe, Amol S. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 34 (02) :218-225
[22]   Waste in the US Health Care System: Estimated Costs and Potential for Savings [J].
Shrank, William H. ;
Rogstad, Teresa L. ;
Parekh, Natasha .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 322 (15) :1501-1509
[23]   Regional variations in health care intensity and physician perceptions of quality of care [J].
Sirovich, BE ;
Gottlieb, DJ ;
Welch, HG ;
Fisher, ES .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 144 (09) :641-649
[24]   Progressivity, horizontal equity and reranking in health care finance: a decomposition analysis for the Netherlands [J].
Wagstaff, A ;
van Doorslaer, E .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1997, 16 (05) :499-516
[25]   Inpatient Care Intensity And Patients' Ratings Of Their Hospital Experiences [J].
Wennberg, John E. ;
Bronner, Kristen ;
Skinner, Jonathan S. ;
Fisher, Elliott S. ;
Goodman, David C. .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2009, 28 (01) :103-112