Research on the BIM Application Mechanism of Engineering-Procurement-Construction Projects Based on a Tripartite Evolutionary Game

被引:14
作者
Sun, Chengshuang [1 ]
Wang, Min [1 ]
Man, Qingpeng [2 ]
Wan, Dongjun [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Civil Engn & Architecture, Sch Urban Econ & Management, Beijing 102616, Peoples R China
[2] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Harbin 150001, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Engineering-procurement-construction (EPC); Building information modeling (BIM); Tripartite evolutionary game; Numerical simulation; IMPLEMENTATION; CONTRACTORS; MANAGEMENT; STABILITY; ROLES;
D O I
10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-12052
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This study establishes a tripartite evolutionary game model based on the assumptions of bounded rationality and the interaction behavior of governments, owners, and general contractors to examine how strategies are changing for three stakeholders regarding the building information modeling (BIM) application in engineering-procurement-construction (EPC) projects. The theoretical model was validated and the effects of critical factors on stakeholder decision making were discussed using case study and numerical simulation analysis. The results show that (1) the choice of the BIM application strategy in EPC projects is affected by the interactive behavior of participants in the game, (2) the reasonable subsidies contribute to the evolution of the ideal stable strategy, (3) the owners' high standard of incentives for general contractors can accelerate BIM promotion, (4) the general contractors are more sensitive to the loss that may be caused by problems with the BIM application, and (5) the positive externalities generated by the application of BIM have a great impact on the wide application of BIM. And some suggestions are put forward toward improving the development of BIM in EPC projects on the basis of findings. This study may contribute to our current understanding of the interactions of stakeholders in EPC projects, as well as provide valuable management implications for the governments in order to promote the development of BIM.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Carlino G., 2015, Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, P349, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-444-59517-1.00006-4
  • [2] BIM-based integrated management workflow design for schedule and cost planning of building fabric maintenance
    Chen, Chao
    Tang, Llewellyn
    [J]. AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2019, 107
  • [3] A BIM-WMS integrated decision support tool for supply chain management in construction
    Chen, Po-Han
    Thanh Chuong Nguyen
    [J]. AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2019, 98 : 289 - 301
  • [4] A game theory analysis of promoting the spongy city construction at the building and community scale
    Chen, Yifei
    Zhu, Demi
    Zhou, Linyi
    [J]. HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 86 : 91 - 100
  • [5] Impacts of Different Types of Owner-Contractor Conflict on Cost Performance in Construction Projects
    Chen, Yong Qiang
    Zhang, Yang Bing
    Zhang, Su Juan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 140 (06)
  • [6] Cheng JCP, 2015, J INF TECHNOL CONSTR, V20, P442
  • [7] BIM security: A critical review and recommendations using encryption strategy and blockchain
    Das, Moumita
    Tao, Xingyu
    Cheng, Jack C. P.
    [J]. AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 126
  • [8] Measuring the Factors that Influence the Diffusion of Prefabricated Construction Technology Innovation
    Dou, Yudan
    Xue, Xiaolong
    Zhao, Zebin
    Jiang, Ying
    [J]. KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2019, 23 (09) : 3737 - 3752
  • [9] Exploring the Moral Hazard Evolutionary Mechanism for BIM Implementation in an Integrated Project Team
    Du, Yanchao
    Zhou, Hengyu
    Yuan, Yongbo
    Xue, Hong
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (20)
  • [10] Life cycle energy efficiency in building structures: A review of current developments and future outlooks based on BIM capabilities
    Eleftheriadis, Stathis
    Mumovic, Dejan
    Greening, Paul
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 67 : 811 - 825