The Effects of Spatial Resolution and Resampling on the Classification Accuracy of Wetland Vegetation Species and Ground Objects: A Study Based on High Spatial Resolution UAV Images

被引:28
作者
Chen, Jianjun [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Zizhen [1 ]
Huang, Renjie [1 ]
You, Haotian [1 ,2 ]
Han, Xiaowen [1 ,2 ]
Yue, Tao [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Guoqing [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Guilin Univ Technol, Coll Geomat & Geoinformat, Guilin 541004, Peoples R China
[2] Guilin Univ Technol, Guangxi Key Lab Spatial Informat & Geomat, Guilin 541004, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
GEOBIA; UAV; spatial scale; aerial images; resampled images; machine learning classifier; RANDOM FOREST; ALPINE GRASSLAND; FUNCTIONAL TYPES; UNCERTAINTY; SELECTION; TRENDS; IMPACT; COVER; SCALE;
D O I
10.3390/drones7010061
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
When employing remote sensing images, it is challenging to classify vegetation species and ground objects due to the abundance of wetland vegetation species and the high fragmentation of ground objects. Remote sensing images are classified primarily according to their spatial resolution, which significantly impacts the classification accuracy of vegetation species and ground objects. However, there are still some areas for improvement in the study of the effects of spatial resolution and resampling on the classification results. The study area in this paper was the core zone of the Huixian Karst National Wetland Park in Guilin, Guangxi, China. The aerial images (Am) with different spatial resolutions were obtained by utilizing the UAV platform, and resampled images (An) with different spatial resolutions were obtained by utilizing the pixel aggregation method. In order to evaluate the impact of spatial resolutions and resampling on the classification accuracy, the Am and the An were utilized for the classification of vegetation species and ground objects based on the geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA) method in addition to various machine learning classifiers. The results showed that: (1) In multi-scale images, both the optimal scale parameter (SP) and the processing time decreased as the spatial resolution diminished in the multi-resolution segmentation process. At the same spatial resolution, the SP of the An was greater than that of the Am. (2) In the case of the Am and the An, the appropriate feature variables were different, and the spectral and texture features in the An were more significant than those in the Am. (3) The classification results of various classifiers in the case of the Am and the An exhibited similar trends for spatial resolutions ranging from 1.2 to 5.9 cm, where the overall classification accuracy increased and then decreased in accordance with the decrease in spatial resolution. Moreover, the classification accuracy of the Am was higher than that of the An. (4) When vegetation species and ground objects were classified at different spatial scales, the classification accuracy differed between the Am and the An.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] Multispectral and hyperspectral remote sensing for identification and mapping of wetland vegetation: a review
    Adam, Elhadi
    Mutanga, Onisimo
    Rugege, Denis
    [J]. WETLANDS ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 18 (03) : 281 - 296
  • [2] Comparison of Random Forest and Support Vector Machine Classifiers for Regional Land Cover Mapping Using Coarse Resolution FY-3C Images
    Adugna, Tesfaye
    Xu, Wenbo
    Fan, Jinlong
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (03)
  • [3] Improving classification accuracy of spectrally similar land covers in the rangeland and plateau areas with a combination of WorldView-2 and UAV images
    Akar, A.
    Gokalp, E.
    Akar, O.
    Yilmaz, V.
    [J]. GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 32 (09) : 990 - 1003
  • [4] An investigation of image processing techniques for substrate classification based on dominant grain size using RGB images from UAV
    Arif, Mohammad Shafi M.
    Guelch, Eberhard
    Tuhtan, Jeffrey A.
    Thumser, Philipp
    Haas, Christian
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 38 (8-10) : 2639 - 2661
  • [5] Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions
    Belgiu, Mariana
    Dragut, Lucian
    [J]. ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 114 : 24 - 31
  • [6] Object-Based Mangrove Species Classification Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hyperspectral Images and Digital Surface Models
    Cao, Jingjing
    Leng, Wanchun
    Liu, Kai
    Liu, Lin
    He, Zhi
    Zhu, Yuanhui
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (01)
  • [7] Machine Learning Classification of Fused Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 Image Data towards Mapping Fruit Plantations in Highly Heterogenous Landscapes
    Chabalala, Yingisani
    Adam, Elhadi
    Ali, Khalid Adem
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (11)
  • [8] Multi-Scale Validation and Uncertainty Analysis of GEOV3 and MuSyQ FVC Products: A Case Study of an Alpine Grassland Ecosystem
    Chen, Jianjun
    Huang, Renjie
    Yang, Yanping
    Feng, Zihao
    You, Haotian
    Han, Xiaowen
    Yi, Shuhua
    Qin, Yu
    Wang, Zhiwei
    Zhou, Guoqing
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (22)
  • [9] Evaluation of the Accuracy of the Field Quadrat Survey of Alpine Grassland Fractional Vegetation Cover Based on the Satellite Remote Sensing Pixel Scale
    Chen, Jianjun
    Zhao, Xuning
    Zhang, Huizi
    Qin, Yu
    Yi, Shuhua
    [J]. ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2019, 8 (11)
  • [10] Improving estimates of fractional vegetation cover based on UAV in alpine grassland on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau
    Chen, Jianjun
    Yi, Shuhua
    Qin, Yu
    Wang, Xiaoyun
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 37 (08) : 1922 - 1936