Going from 3D to 1D: A 1D approach to common-envelope evolution

被引:3
|
作者
Bronner, V. A. [1 ]
Schneider, F. R. N. [1 ,2 ]
Podsiadlowski, Ph. [1 ,3 ]
Roepke, F. K. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberger Inst Theoret Studien, Schloss Wolfsbrunnenweg 35, D-69118 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Univ, Astron Rechen Inst, Zentrum Astron, Monchhofstr 12-14, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Univ Oxford, St Edmund Hall, Oxford OX1 4AR, England
[4] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Theoret Astrophys, Zentrum Astron, Philosophenweg 12, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
hydrodynamics; methods: numerical; stars: AGB and post-AGB; binaries: close; stars: mass-loss; CIRCULAR-ORBIT PERTURBER; DYNAMICAL FRICTION; NEUTRON-STAR; CONVECTIVE BOUNDARIES; LOW-MASS; BINARY; MODULES; PHASE; SIMULATIONS; PROGENITORS;
D O I
10.1051/0004-6361/202347397
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The common-envelope (CE) phase is a crucial stage in binary star evolution because the orbital separation can shrink drastically while ejecting the envelope of a giant star. Three-dimensional (3D) hydrodynamic simulations of CE evolution are indispensable to learning about the mechanisms that play a role during the CE phase. While these simulations offer great insight, they are computationally expensive. We propose a one-dimensional (1D) model to simulate the CE phase within the stellar-evolution code MESA by using a parametric drag force prescription for dynamical drag and adding the released orbital energy as heat into the envelope. We computed CE events of a 0.97 M-circle dot asymptotic giant branch star and a point-mass companion with mass ratios of 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75, and compared them to 3D simulations of the same setup. The 1D CE model contains two free parameters, which we demonstrate are both needed to fit the spiral-in behavior and the fraction of ejected envelope mass of the 1D method to the 3D simulations. For mass ratios of 0.25 and 0.50, we find well-fitting 1D simulations, while for a mass ratio of 0.75, we do not find a satisfactory fit to the 3D simulation as some of the assumptions in the 1D method are no longer valid. In all our simulations, we find that the released recombination energy is needed to accelerate the envelope and drive the ejection.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Hanle effect in 1D, 2D and 3D
    Sainz, RM
    Trujillo Bueno, J
    SOLAR POLARIZATION, 1999, 243 : 143 - +
  • [22] Laser Solitons in 1D, 2D and 3D
    Rosanov, Nikolay N.
    Fedorov, Sergey, V
    Veretenov, Nikolay A.
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL D, 2019, 73 (07):
  • [23] 3D, 2D, 1D - ADLER,DA
    BERNSTEIN, JE
    YOUNG CHILDREN, 1976, 31 (04): : 316 - 316
  • [24] Laser Solitons in 1D, 2D and 3D
    Nikolay N. Rosanov
    Sergey V. Fedorov
    Nikolay A. Veretenov
    The European Physical Journal D, 2019, 73
  • [25] Superconductivity from the repulsive electron interaction - from 1D to 3D
    Aoki, H
    ANDERSON LOCALIZATION AND ITS RAMIFICATIONS: DISORDER, PHASE COHERENCE AND ELECTRON CORRELATIONS, 2003, 630 : 219 - 243
  • [26] Epigenetic characteristics of the mitotic chromosome in 1D and 3D
    Oomen, Marlies E.
    Dekker, Job
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2017, 52 (02) : 185 - 204
  • [27] CONDUCTIVITY OF 1D ELECTRONS IN ANISOTROPIC 3D MEDIUM
    MARIANER, S
    ZEVIN, V
    WEGER, M
    MOSES, D
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS C-SOLID STATE PHYSICS, 1982, 15 (18): : 3877 - 3896
  • [28] 1D and 3D resistivity inversions for geotechnical investigation
    Sultan, Sultan Awad
    Santos, Fernando A. Monteiro
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS AND ENGINEERING, 2008, 5 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [29] Perception of 1D and 3D transversal wave motion
    Jain, A.
    Zaidi, Q.
    PERCEPTION, 2011, 40 : 173 - 173
  • [30] Decoupled 1D/3D Analysis of a Hydraulic Valve
    Mehring, Carsten
    Zopey, Ashok
    Latham, Matt
    Ihde, Thomas
    Massie, Dan
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING 2014 (ICCMSE 2014), 2014, 1618 : 979 - 982