Going from 3D to 1D: A 1D approach to common-envelope evolution

被引:3
|
作者
Bronner, V. A. [1 ]
Schneider, F. R. N. [1 ,2 ]
Podsiadlowski, Ph. [1 ,3 ]
Roepke, F. K. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberger Inst Theoret Studien, Schloss Wolfsbrunnenweg 35, D-69118 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Univ, Astron Rechen Inst, Zentrum Astron, Monchhofstr 12-14, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Univ Oxford, St Edmund Hall, Oxford OX1 4AR, England
[4] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Theoret Astrophys, Zentrum Astron, Philosophenweg 12, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
hydrodynamics; methods: numerical; stars: AGB and post-AGB; binaries: close; stars: mass-loss; CIRCULAR-ORBIT PERTURBER; DYNAMICAL FRICTION; NEUTRON-STAR; CONVECTIVE BOUNDARIES; LOW-MASS; BINARY; MODULES; PHASE; SIMULATIONS; PROGENITORS;
D O I
10.1051/0004-6361/202347397
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The common-envelope (CE) phase is a crucial stage in binary star evolution because the orbital separation can shrink drastically while ejecting the envelope of a giant star. Three-dimensional (3D) hydrodynamic simulations of CE evolution are indispensable to learning about the mechanisms that play a role during the CE phase. While these simulations offer great insight, they are computationally expensive. We propose a one-dimensional (1D) model to simulate the CE phase within the stellar-evolution code MESA by using a parametric drag force prescription for dynamical drag and adding the released orbital energy as heat into the envelope. We computed CE events of a 0.97 M-circle dot asymptotic giant branch star and a point-mass companion with mass ratios of 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75, and compared them to 3D simulations of the same setup. The 1D CE model contains two free parameters, which we demonstrate are both needed to fit the spiral-in behavior and the fraction of ejected envelope mass of the 1D method to the 3D simulations. For mass ratios of 0.25 and 0.50, we find well-fitting 1D simulations, while for a mass ratio of 0.75, we do not find a satisfactory fit to the 3D simulation as some of the assumptions in the 1D method are no longer valid. In all our simulations, we find that the released recombination energy is needed to accelerate the envelope and drive the ejection.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Going from 3D Common-envelope Simulations to Fast 1D Simulations
    Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies, Heidelberg, Germany
    不详
    不详
    不详
    不详
    Bull Soc R Sci Liege, 3 (230-243):
  • [2] On 3D and 1D Weyl particles in a 1D box
    De Vincenzo, Salvatore
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL PLUS, 2020, 135 (10):
  • [3] On 3D and 1D Weyl particles in a 1D box
    Salvatore De Vincenzo
    The European Physical Journal Plus, 135
  • [4] Nanocarbon Interconnects - from 1D to 3D
    Yang, Cary Y.
    2020 IEEE ELECTRON DEVICES TECHNOLOGY AND MANUFACTURING CONFERENCE (EDTM 2020), 2020,
  • [5] Radiative transfer from 1D to 3D
    Juvela, M
    Padoan, P
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE DUSTY AND MOLECULAR UNIVERSE: A PRELUDE TO HERSCHEL AND ALMA, 2005, 577 : 373 - 374
  • [6] 1D Model for the 3D Magnetohydrodynamics
    Dai, Mimi
    Vyas, Bhakti
    Zhang, Xiangxiong
    JOURNAL OF NONLINEAR SCIENCE, 2023, 33 (05)
  • [7] 3D Instances as 1D Kernels
    Wu, Yizheng
    Shi, Min
    Du, Shuaiyuan
    Lu, Hao
    Cao, Zhiguo
    Zhong, Weicai
    COMPUTER VISION, ECCV 2022, PT XXIX, 2022, 13689 : 235 - 252
  • [8] 1D Model for the 3D Magnetohydrodynamics
    Mimi Dai
    Bhakti Vyas
    Xiangxiong Zhang
    Journal of Nonlinear Science, 2023, 33
  • [9] Linking 1D Stellar Evolution to 3D Hydrodynamic Simulations
    Cristini, A.
    Hirschi, R.
    Georgy, C.
    Meakin, C.
    Arnett, D.
    Viallet, M.
    NEW WINDOWS ON MASSIVE STARS: ASTEROSEISMOLOGY, INTERFEROMETRY AND SPECTROPOLARIMETRY, 2014, 307 : 98 - 99
  • [10] 3D evolution of sand fracture under 1D compression
    Cil, M. B.
    Alshibli, K. A.
    GEOTECHNIQUE, 2014, 64 (05): : 351 - 364