System Architecture of TWIN: A New Digital Twin-Based Clinical Decision Support System for Type 1 Diabetes Management in Children

被引:3
作者
Cappon, Giacomo [1 ]
Pellizzari, Elisa [1 ]
Cossu, Luca [1 ]
Sparacino, Giovanni [1 ]
Deodati, Annalisa [2 ]
Schiaffini, Riccardo [3 ]
Cianfarani, Stefano [2 ]
Facchinetti, Andrea [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Informat Engn, Padua, Italy
[2] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dipartimento Med Sistemi, Rome, Italy
[3] IRCCS, Bambino Gesu Childrens Hosp, Endocrine & Diabet Unit, Rome, Italy
来源
2023 IEEE 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BODY SENSOR NETWORKS, BSN | 2023年
关键词
type; 1; diabetes; decision support systems; digital twinning; suggestion generation; multiple daily injection; MODEL;
D O I
10.1109/BSN58485.2023.10331272
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Type 1 diabetes (T1D) management in pediatric patients presents unique challenges due to the evolving physiology and the need for close monitoring and intervention. This article presents the system architecture of TWIN, a novel personalized Decision Support System (DSS) for managing multiple daily injections (MDI) therapy in pediatric T1D patients. TWIN incorporates advanced technologies such as continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices, smart insulin pens, and wearable physical activity trackers to collect large amounts of user-generated data. At its core, the system leverages an open-source digital twinning methodology called ReplayBG to create virtual clones of patients, representing their unique physiological characteristics. These virtual clones are then utilized in multiple simulation iterations to personalize and optimize therapy parameters. To promote the transparency of the generated results, TWIN employs a large-scale linguistic model based on a Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT). This model provides clear explanations and contextual information regarding the recommended therapy parameters. Finally, the proposed TWIN system architecture integrates these algorithms within a state-of-the-art digital platform. This platform offers a user-friendly interface for patients and healthcare providers, enabling effective management and tuning of MDI therapy. Future work will focus on testing and validating TWIN to assess its efficacy and usability in pediatric T1D management.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
American Diabetes Association, 2022, Diabetes Care, V46
[2]  
Cappon G., IEEE Trans. Biomed. Technol.
[3]   An Integrated Mobile Platform for Automated Data Collection and Real-Time Patient Monitoring in Diabetes Clinical Trials [J].
Cappon, Giacomo ;
Cossu, Luca ;
Boscari, Federico ;
Bruttomesso, Daniela ;
Sparacino, Giovanni ;
Facchinetti, Andrea .
JOURNAL OF DIABETES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 16 (06) :1555-1559
[4]  
Cappon G, 2019, IEEE ENG MED BIO, P6914, DOI [10.1109/EMBC.2019.8856846, 10.1109/embc.2019.8856846]
[5]   Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensors for Diabetes Management: A Review of Technologies and Applications [J].
Cappon, Giacomo ;
Vettoretti, Martina ;
Sparacino, Giovanni ;
Facchinetti, Andrea .
DIABETES & METABOLISM JOURNAL, 2019, 43 (04) :383-397
[6]   Model of glucose sensor error components: identification and assessment for new Dexcom G4 generation devices [J].
Facchinetti, Andrea ;
Del Favero, Simone ;
Sparacino, Giovanni ;
Cobelli, Claudio .
MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2015, 53 (12) :1259-1269
[7]   Fatigue in patients with diabetes: A review [J].
Fritschi, Cynthia ;
Quinn, Laurie .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2010, 69 (01) :33-41
[8]   Interventions Using Wearable Physical Activity Trackers Among Adults With Cardiometabolic Conditions A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Hodkinson, Alexander ;
Kontopantelis, Evangelos ;
Adeniji, Charles ;
van Marwijk, Harm ;
McMillian, Brian ;
Bower, Peter ;
Panagioti, Maria .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (07)
[9]  
Idi E, 2023, DIABETES TECHNOL THE, V25, pA118
[10]   Evaluation of clinical decision support systems for diabetes care: An overview of current evidence [J].
Jia, Pengli ;
Zhao, Pujing ;
Chen, Jingjing ;
Zhang, Mingming .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 25 (01) :66-77