Air pollution, weather factors, and realized volatility forecasts of agricultural commodity futures

被引:8
作者
Luo, Jiawen [1 ]
Zhang, Qun [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] South China Univ Technol, Sch Business Adm, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Guangdong Univ Foreign Studies, Sch Finance, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Southern China Inst Fortune Management Res, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Inst Financial Openness & Asset Management, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[5] Guangdong Univ Foreign Studies, Sch Finance, Univ Town, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
agricultural commodity futures; air pollution; Bayesian model averaging; LASSO; volatility forecasting; STOCK RETURNS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ANYTHING BEAT; MODEL; PRICES; REGULARIZATION; INVESTORS; IMPACT; SAMPLE; HAR;
D O I
10.1002/fut.22467
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study investigates the potential effects of environmental factors on fluctuations in agricultural commodity futures markets, by constructing a new category of daily exogenous predictors related to air pollution, weather, climate change, and investor attention. The empirical results from out-of-sample analyses suggest that the heterogeneous autoregressive (HAR) model incorporating all these exogenous predictors is more likely to outperform other HAR-type models. Additionally, economic evaluations demonstrate the superior performance of models incorporating investors' attention to climate change or extreme weather as predictors. While not all exogenous predictors are equally important for volatility forecasts, adopting appropriate variable selection methods to handle different sets of exogenous predictors can lead to better performance than the HAR benchmark. With the inclusion of air pollution or weather factors in the HAR model, a portfolio with an annualized average excess return of 16.2068% or a Sharpe ratio of 10.0431 can be achieved for the wheat futures, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 217
页数:67
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Temperature Shocks and Establishment Sales [J].
Addoum, Jawad M. ;
Ng, David T. ;
Ortiz-Bobea, Ariel .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2020, 33 (03) :1331-1366
[2]   Answering the skeptics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts [J].
Andersen, TG ;
Bollerslev, T .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1998, 39 (04) :885-905
[3]  
Andersen TG, 2006, HBK ECON, V24, P777, DOI 10.1016/S1574-0706(05)01015-3
[4]   Designing Realized Kernels to Measure the ex post Variation of Equity Prices in the Presence of Noise [J].
Barndorff-Nielsen, Ole E. ;
Hansen, Peter Reinhard ;
Lunde, Asger ;
Shephard, Neil .
ECONOMETRICA, 2008, 76 (06) :1481-1536
[5]   Modeling and forecasting (un)reliable realized covariances for more reliable financial decisions [J].
Bollerslev, Tim ;
Patton, Andrew J. ;
Quaedvlieg, Rogier .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2018, 207 (01) :71-91
[6]   Exploiting the errors: A simple approach for improved volatility forecasting [J].
Bollerslev, Tim ;
Patton, Andrew J. ;
Quaedvlieg, Rogier .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2016, 192 (01) :1-18
[7]   Dynamic Portfolio Optimization with Transaction Costs: Heuristics and Dual Bounds [J].
Brown, David B. ;
Smith, James E. .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2011, 57 (10) :1752-1770
[8]   MODELING AND FORECASTING LARGE REALIZED COVARIANCE MATRICES AND PORTFOLIO CHOICE [J].
Callot, Laurent A. F. ;
Kock, Anders B. ;
Medeiros, Marcelo C. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2017, 32 (01) :140-158
[9]   Predicting excess stock returns out of sample: Can anything beat the historical average? [J].
Campbell, John Y. ;
Thompson, Samuel B. .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2008, 21 (04) :1509-1531
[10]   Stock market returns: A note on temperature anomaly [J].
Cao, M ;
Wei, J .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2005, 29 (06) :1559-1573