Intra-prostatic gold fiducial marker insertion for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT): five-year experience on 795 patients

被引:6
作者
Mahdavi, Ali [1 ]
Mofid, Bahram [2 ]
Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farzad [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Imam Hossein Educ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Tehran, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Fac Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, 1985717443, Tehran, Iran
[3] Iran Univ Med Sci, Senses Hlth Inst F, ENT & Head & Neck Res Ctr & Dept, Sch Med, Tehran, Iran
[4] Iran Univ Med Sci, Dept Radiat Oncol, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Adverse effects; Efficacy; Gold fiducial marker; Image-guided radiotherapy; Prostate cancer; EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY; RADIATION-THERAPY; POSITION VERIFICATION; LOCAL RECURRENCE; LOCALIZATION; IMPLANTATION; CANCER; PLACEMENT; TOXICITY; GUIDANCE;
D O I
10.1186/s12880-023-01036-z
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
IntroductionProstate cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in males. The use of intra-prostatic fiducial markers (FM) for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) has become widespread due to their accuracy, relatively safe use, low cost, and reproducibility. FM provides a tool to monitor prostate position and volume changes. Many studies reported low to moderate rates of complications following FM implantation. In the current study, we present our five years' experience regarding the insertion technique, technical success, and rates of complication and migration of intraprostatic insertion of FM gold marker.MethodsFrom January 2018 to January 2023, 795 patients with prostate cancer candidate for IGRT (with or without a history of radical prostatectomy) enrolled in this study. We used three fiducial markers (3*0.6 mm) inserted through an 18-gauge Chiba needle under transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) guidance. The patients were observed for complications up to seven days after the procedure. Besides, the rate of marker migration was recorded.ResultsAll procedures were completed successfully, and all patients tolerated the procedure well with minimal discomfort. The rate of sepsis after the procedure was 1%, and transient urinary obstruction was 1.6%. Only two patients experienced marker migration shortly after insertion, and no fiducial migration was reported throughout radiotherapy. No other major complication was recorded.DiscussionTRUS-guided intraprostatic FM implantation is technically feasible, safe, and well-tolerated in most patients. The FM migration can seldom occur, with negligible effects. This study can provide convincing evidence that TRUS-guided intra-prostatic FM insertion is an appropriate choice for IGRT.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [11] Single-Center Experience in Prostate Fiducial Marker Placement: Technique and Midterm Follow-up
    Kably, Issam
    Bordegaray, Matthew
    Shah, Kush
    Salsamendi, Jason
    Narayanan, Govindarajan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2014, 25 (07) : 1125 - 1132
  • [12] Late toxicity and biochemical control in with and without dose escalated image 554 prostate cancer patients treated guided radiotherapy
    Kok, David
    Gill, Suki
    Bressel, Mathias
    Byrne, Keelan
    Kron, Tomas
    Fox, Chris
    Duchesne, Gillian
    Tai, Keen Hun
    Foroudi, Farshad
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2013, 107 (02) : 140 - 146
  • [13] Intra-fraction prostate displacement in radiotherapy estimated from pre- and post-treatment imaging of patients with implanted fiducial markers
    Kron, Tomas
    Thomas, Jessica
    Fox, Chris
    Thompson, Ann
    Owen, Rebecca
    Herschtal, Alan
    Haworth, Annette
    Tai, Keen-Hun
    Foroudi, Farshad
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 95 (02) : 191 - 197
  • [14] Intraprostatic fiducials for localization of the prostate gland: Monitoring intermarker distances during radiation therapy to test for marker stability
    Kupelian, PA
    Willoughby, TR
    Meeks, SL
    Forbes, A
    Wagner, T
    Maach, M
    Langen, KM
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 62 (05): : 1291 - 1296
  • [15] Ultrasound-guided transrectal implantation of gold markers for prostate localization during external beam radiotherapy: Complication rate and risk factors
    Langenhuijsen, Johan F.
    van Lin, Emile N. J. T.
    Kiemeney, Lambertus A.
    van der Vight, Lisette P.
    McColl, Gill M.
    Visser, Andries G.
    Witjes, J. Alfred
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (03): : 671 - 676
  • [16] Technique of Outpatient Placement of Intraprostatic Fiducial Markers Before External Beam Radiotherapy
    Linden, Robert A.
    Weiner, Perry R.
    Gomella, Leonard G.
    Dicker, Adam P.
    Suh, David B.
    Trabulsi, Edouard J.
    Valicenti, Richard K.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2009, 73 (04) : 881 - 886
  • [17] Infections after fiducial marker implantation for prostate radiotherapy: are we underestimating the risks?
    Loh, Jasmin
    Baker, Katie
    Sridharan, Swetha
    Greer, Peter
    Wratten, Chris
    Capp, Anne
    Gallagher, Sarah
    Martin, Jarad
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2015, 10
  • [18] Long-term experience with transrectal and transperineal implantations of fiducial gold markers in the prostate for position verification in external beam radiotherapy; feasibility, toxicity and quality of life
    Moman, Maaike R.
    van der Heide, Uulke A.
    Kotte, Alexis N. T. J.
    van Moorselaar, R. Jeroen A.
    Bol, Gijsbert H.
    Franken, Stefan P. G.
    van Vulpen, Marco
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 96 (01) : 38 - 42
  • [19] Local recurrence after retropubic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer does not exclusively occur at the anastomotic site
    Nguyen, Daniel P.
    Giannarini, Gianluca
    Seiler, Roland
    Schiller, Rike
    Thoeny, Harriet C.
    Thalmann, George N.
    Studer, Urs E.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 112 (04) : E243 - E249
  • [20] Should 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Replace CT and Bone Scan in Clinical Staging of High-risk Prostate Cancer?
    Pepe, Pietro
    Pennisi, Michele
    [J]. ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 42 (03) : 1495 - 1498