Intra-prostatic gold fiducial marker insertion for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT): five-year experience on 795 patients

被引:6
作者
Mahdavi, Ali [1 ]
Mofid, Bahram [2 ]
Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farzad [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Imam Hossein Educ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Tehran, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Fac Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, 1985717443, Tehran, Iran
[3] Iran Univ Med Sci, Senses Hlth Inst F, ENT & Head & Neck Res Ctr & Dept, Sch Med, Tehran, Iran
[4] Iran Univ Med Sci, Dept Radiat Oncol, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Adverse effects; Efficacy; Gold fiducial marker; Image-guided radiotherapy; Prostate cancer; EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY; RADIATION-THERAPY; POSITION VERIFICATION; LOCAL RECURRENCE; LOCALIZATION; IMPLANTATION; CANCER; PLACEMENT; TOXICITY; GUIDANCE;
D O I
10.1186/s12880-023-01036-z
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
IntroductionProstate cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in males. The use of intra-prostatic fiducial markers (FM) for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) has become widespread due to their accuracy, relatively safe use, low cost, and reproducibility. FM provides a tool to monitor prostate position and volume changes. Many studies reported low to moderate rates of complications following FM implantation. In the current study, we present our five years' experience regarding the insertion technique, technical success, and rates of complication and migration of intraprostatic insertion of FM gold marker.MethodsFrom January 2018 to January 2023, 795 patients with prostate cancer candidate for IGRT (with or without a history of radical prostatectomy) enrolled in this study. We used three fiducial markers (3*0.6 mm) inserted through an 18-gauge Chiba needle under transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) guidance. The patients were observed for complications up to seven days after the procedure. Besides, the rate of marker migration was recorded.ResultsAll procedures were completed successfully, and all patients tolerated the procedure well with minimal discomfort. The rate of sepsis after the procedure was 1%, and transient urinary obstruction was 1.6%. Only two patients experienced marker migration shortly after insertion, and no fiducial migration was reported throughout radiotherapy. No other major complication was recorded.DiscussionTRUS-guided intraprostatic FM implantation is technically feasible, safe, and well-tolerated in most patients. The FM migration can seldom occur, with negligible effects. This study can provide convincing evidence that TRUS-guided intra-prostatic FM insertion is an appropriate choice for IGRT.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] PROSTATE MOTION DURING STANDARD RADIOTHERAPY AS ASSESSED BY FIDUCIAL MARKERS
    CROOK, JM
    RAYMOND, Y
    SALHANI, D
    YANG, H
    ESCHE, B
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1995, 37 (01) : 35 - 42
  • [2] Influence of the number of elongated fiducial markers on the localization accuracy of the prostate
    de Boer, Johan
    de Bois, Josien
    van Herk, Marcel
    Sonke, Jan-Jakob
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (19) : 6211 - 6226
  • [3] Fiducial markers implantation for prostate image-guided radiotherapy: a report on the transperineal approach
    De Cicco, Luigi
    Bracelli, Stefano
    [J]. RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2019, 124 (02): : 132 - 135
  • [4] Defining Prostatic Vascular Pedicle Recurrence and the Anatomy of Local Recurrence of Prostate Cancer on Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography
    Dundee, Philip
    Furrer, Marc A.
    Corcoran, Niall M.
    Peters, Justin
    Pan, Henry
    Ballok, Zita
    Ryan, Andrew
    Guerrieri, Mario
    Costello, Anthony J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 41 : 116 - 122
  • [5] Escudero JUJ, 2010, INSERTION INTRAPROST
  • [6] Patient-reported complications from fiducial marker implantation for prostate image-guided radiotherapy
    Gill, S.
    Li, J.
    Thomas, J.
    Bressel, M.
    Thursky, K.
    Styles, C.
    Tai, K. H.
    Duchesne, G. M.
    Foroudi, F.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 85 (1015) : 1011 - 1017
  • [7] Technical aspects of daily online positioning of the prostate for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy using an electronic portal imaging device
    Herman, MG
    Pisansky, TM
    Kruse, JJ
    Prisciandaro, JI
    Davis, BJ
    King, BF
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 57 (04): : 1131 - 1140
  • [8] Acute toxicity of 4-week versus 5-week hypofractionated radiotherapy in localised prostate cancer
    Houshyari, Mohammad
    Mofid, Bahram
    Tabatabaee, Maryam Alavi
    Bakhshandeh, Mohsen
    Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farzad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2022, 21 (04) : 481 - 486
  • [9] Implantation of fiducial markers for image guidance in prostate radiotherapy: patient-reported toxicity
    Igdem, S.
    Akpinar, H.
    Alco, G.
    Agacayak, F.
    Turkan, S.
    Okkan, S.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2009, 82 (983) : 941 - 945
  • [10] Prostate motion during radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients with and without application of a hydrogel spacer: a comparative study
    Juneja, Prabhjot
    Kneebone, Andrew
    Booth, Jeremy T.
    Thwaites, David I.
    Kaur, Ramandeep
    Colvill, Emma
    Ng, Jin A.
    Keall, Paul J.
    Eade, Thomas
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2015, 10