Drivers and mitigants of resources consumption in China: Discovering the role of digital finance and environmental regulations

被引:30
作者
Wang, Yuyan [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Qinghua [2 ]
Razi, Ummara [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] GuiZhou Univ, Sch Marxism, Guiyang 550000, Peoples R China
[2] GuiZhou Univ, Sch Philosophy & Social Dev, Guiyang 550000, Peoples R China
[3] ILMA Univ, Dept Business Adm, Karachi, Pakistan
[4] Sunway Univ, Dept Econ & Finance, Sunway Univ Business Sch, Subang Jaya, Malaysia
关键词
Environmental regulations; Digital finance; Consumption-based resources footprint; Bootstrap ARDL; TAX;
D O I
10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103180
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Efficient resource consumption is one of the global challenges of the era to attain economic and environmental sustainability. The high-level consumption of resources has a detrimental effect on the environment. Simultaneously, the low-level resource consumption hindered economic growth; therefore, it is crucial to identify the key factors that can instigate resource conservation without affecting economic and environmental sustainability. This study investigates the role of digital finance and environmental regulation in China as the mitigants of resource consumption. The study applied the "bootstrapping autoregressive distributed lag" (BARDL) approach to investigate the long-run cointegration among digital finance, environmental regulations (environmental taxes), economic growth, and material footprint (proxy of resources consumption) by employing the quarterly data from 2011 to 2020. The preliminary finding through the diagnostic test confirms the normal distribution of the data. Likewise, the unit root tests confirmed the integration order of I (1). The outcomes of the advanced cointegration approach and the dynamic process of BARDL demonstrate that the increase in environmental taxes and digital finance significantly reduced the material footprint. In contrast, the upsurge in economic growth expands the material footprint in the long and short run. It shows that environmental taxes and digital finance work as mitigants while economic growth is the key driver to accelerating resource consumption. Thus, the appropriate policy intervention for these factors can significantly change resource consumption. Hence, China must implement strict regulations to strengthen the environmental tax mechanism and support digital finance to achieve economic and environmental sustainability goals.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] The potency of eco-innovation, natural resource and financial development on ecological footprint: a quantile-ARDL-based evidence from China
    Afshan, Sahar
    Yaqoob, Tanzeela
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (33) : 50675 - 50685
  • [2] Financial development and natural resources. Is there a stock market resource curse?
    Ali, Adnan
    Ramakrishnan, Suresh
    Faisal
    [J]. RESOURCES POLICY, 2022, 75
  • [3] Environmental taxes: Drivers behind the revenue collected
    Andreoni, Valeria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 221 : 17 - 26
  • [4] COP26: more challenges than achievements
    Arora, Naveen Kumar
    Mishra, Isha
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 4 (04) : 585 - 588
  • [5] The Sustainable Environment in Uruguay: The Roles of Financial Development, Natural Resources, and Trade Globalization
    Awosusi, Abraham Ayobamiji
    Xulu, Nkosinathi G.
    Ahmadi, Mohsen
    Rjoub, Husam
    Altuntas, Mehmet
    Uhunamure, Solomon Eghosa
    Saint Akadiri, Seyi
    Kirikkaleli, Dervis
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [6] How Do Renewable Energy, Economic Growth and Natural Resources Rent Affect Environmental Sustainability in a Globalized Economy? Evidence From Colombia Based on the Gradual Shift Causality Approach
    Awosusi, Abraham Ayobamiji
    Mata, Mario Nuno
    Ahmed, Zahoor
    Coelho, Manuel Francisco
    Altuntas, Mehmet
    Martins, Jose Moleiro
    Martins, Jessica Nunes
    Onifade, Stephen Taiwo
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 9
  • [7] Unveiling the heterogeneous impacts of environmental taxes on energy consumption and energy intensity: Empirical evidence from OECD countries
    Bashir, Muhammad Farhan
    Ma, Benjiang
    Shahbaz, Muhammad
    Shahzad, Umer
    Vo, Xuan Vinh
    [J]. ENERGY, 2021, 226 (226)
  • [8] Environmental tax reform: does it work? A survey of the empirical evidence
    Bosquet, B
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 34 (01) : 19 - 32
  • [9] The sustainable potential of efficient air-transportation industry and green innovation in realising environmental sustainability in G7 countries
    Chen, Jieping
    Hu, Xiaoli
    Razi, Ummara
    Rexhepi, Gadaf
    [J]. ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2022, 35 (01): : 3814 - 3835
  • [10] Impact of technological innovation on energy efficiency in industry 4.0 era: Moderation of shadow economy in sustainable development
    Chen, Maozhi
    Sinha, Avik
    Hu, Kexiang
    Shah, Muhammad Ibrahim
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 164