Evaluation of Blended Learning-Based Utilization using CSE-UCLA Model

被引:0
作者
Samal, Diana [1 ]
Hartono
Widodo, Estu [1 ]
Asih, Ria Arista [1 ]
Hukom, Julham [2 ]
Belatu, Salifa [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, Indonesia
[2] Univ Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
[3] IAIN Ambon, Nusaniwe, Indonesia
来源
PEGEM EGITIM VE OGRETIM DERGISI | 2024年 / 14卷 / 02期
关键词
Technology; Blended Learning; Evaluation; CSE-UCLA (Center for the Study of Evaluation University of California in Los Angeles);
D O I
10.47750/pegegog.14.02.16
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Implementing the Blended Learning model was identified as having a major influence on achieving learning objectives in the classroom. Blended learning facilitates different times and types of student learning so students can learn according to their needs. The purpose of this study is to define the blended learning effectiveness used at MTs Ittaqollah Ambon in terms of some components evaluation, that are system assessment, program planning, program implementation, program improvement, and program certification. The CSE-UCLA (Center for the Study of the Evaluation University of California, Los Angeles) evaluation model-based evaluative study was employed in this research as the methodology. The study's subjects were the students, principals, teachers, and the management team for blended learning. The research results indicated that the level of effectiveness average of the components of the assessment system was 86.6% (good category), the level of effectiveness average of the planning program components was 84.5% (good category), the level of effectiveness average of program implementation components was 89 .3% (good category), the level of effectiveness average of improvement program components is 85.5% (good category), the average effectiveness level of certification program components is 85.9% (good category). The study's results can provide suggestions or recommendations for enhancing or refining the usage of blended learning in schools to maximize the achievement of learning objectives.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 139
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Akgunduz D., 2016, Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, V15, P106
[2]   Identifying criteria that should be considered when deciding the proportion of online to face-to-face components of a blended course [J].
Alammary, Ali ;
Carbone, Angela ;
Sheard, Judy .
2015 48TH HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES (HICSS), 2015, :72-80
[3]  
Marco FA, 2013, FED CONF COMPUT SCI, P727
[4]  
Albiladi WS, 2019, Journal of Language Teaching and Research, V10, P232, DOI [10.17507/jltr.1002.03, DOI 10.17507/JLTR.1002.03]
[5]  
Ariawan I. Putu Wisna, 2016, International Journal of Advanced Research in Artificial Intelligence, V5, P1
[6]  
Baytak A., 2011, International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, V3, P139
[7]  
Bibi S, 2015, Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, V5, P74, DOI [10.21831/jpv.v5i1.6074, 10.21831/jpv.v5i1.6074, DOI 10.21831/JPV.V5I1.6074]
[8]  
Bruff D.O., 2013, J ONLINE LEARNING TE, V9, P187
[9]   Exploring the relationships between learning styles, online participation, learning achievement and course satisfaction: An empirical study of a blended learning course [J].
Cheng, Gary ;
Chau, Juliana .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 47 (02) :257-278
[10]   Student characteristics and learning and teaching factors predicting affective and motivational outcomes in flipped college classrooms [J].
Cho, Moon-Heum ;
Park, Seung Won ;
Lee, Sang-eun .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2021, 46 (03) :509-522