SPECT myocardial blood flow quantitation for the detection of angiographic stenoses with cardiac-dedicated CZT SPECT

被引:1
作者
Zhang, Jie [1 ]
Xie, Jian [1 ]
Li, Muwei [1 ]
Fang, Wei [2 ]
Hsu, Bailing [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Dept Nucl Med, Henan Prov Peoples Hosp, Cent China Fuwai Hosp, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Dept Nucl Med, Fuwai Hosp, Natl Ctr Cardiovasc Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Missouri Columbia, Nucl Sci & Engn Inst, Columbia, MO USA
[4] Univ Missouri Columbia, Nucl Sci & Engn Inst, E2433 Lafferre Hall, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
关键词
CZT SPECT; Tc-99m-sestamibi; myocardial blood flow quantitation; myocardial flow capacity; coronary artery disease; CORONARY-ARTERY-DISEASE; RESERVE; PET; QUANTIFICATION; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s12350-023-03334-z
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
PurposeCZT SPECT with the enhanced imaging characteristic facilitates SPECT myocardial blood flow (MBF) quantitation moving toward a clinical utility to uncover myocardial ischemia. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of stress MBF, myocardial flow reserve (MFR) and myocardial flow capacity (MFC) derived from CZT SPECT in the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD).MethodsOne-hundred and eighty patients underwent two-day rest/adenosine-stress scans for SPECT MBF quantitation. All dynamic SPECT images were reconstructed and corrected with necessary corrections. The one-tissue two-compartment kinetic model was utilized to fit kinetic parameters (K1, k2 and FBV) by numeric optimization and converted to MBF from K1. Rest MBF, stress MBF and MFR in left ventricle and coronary territories were calculated from flow polar maps. MFC was assessed by extents of moderately and severely abnormal flow statuses using an integrated flow diagram. Per-patient and per-vessel analyses were performed to determine cutoff values for the detection of angiographically obstructive and flow-limited CAD.ResultsUsing the threshold of & GE; 50% stenosis, 149 patients (82.78%) were classified to have obstructive lesions in 355 vessels (65.74%). Using the threshold of & GE; 70% stenosis, 113 patients (62.78%) were classified to have flow-limited lesions in 282 vessels (52.22%). On per-patient analysis, the optimal cutoff values of stress MBF and MFR to detect & GE; 50% stenosis were (1.44 ml/min/g, 1.96) and (1.34 ml/min/g and 1.75) to detect & GE; 70% stenosis. The optimal cutoff values for severely and combined moderately severely abnormal MFC extents were (2.3-2.5%, 23.1%) and (7.5%, 29.4%), respectively. The overall sensitivity of MFC (0.84-0.86, 0.86-0.90) to detect & GE; 50% and & GE; 70% lesions surpassed those of stress MBF (0.78. 0.78) and MFR (0.80, 0.75) (all p < 0.05) with similar specificity (MFC = 0.84-0.90, 0.87-0.91; stress MBF = 0.87, 0.91; MFR = 0.84, 0.89) (all p & GE; 0.05).ConclusionThe non-invasive SPECT MBF quantitation using CZT SPECT is a reliable method to detect angiographically obstructive and flow-limited CAD. Myocardial flow capacity can outperform with higher diagnostic sensitivity than stress MBF or MFR alone.
引用
收藏
页码:2618 / 2632
页数:15
相关论文
共 34 条
[31]  
YOUDEN WJ, 1950, BIOMETRICS, V6, P172, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::AID-CNCR2820030106>3.0.CO
[32]  
2-3
[33]   Absolute myocardial blood flows derived by dynamic CZT scan vs invasive fractional flow reserve: Correlation and accuracy [J].
Zavadovsky, Konstantin V. ;
Mochula, Andrew V. ;
Boshchenko, Alla A. ;
Vrublevsky, Alexander V. ;
Baev, Andrew E. ;
Krylov, Alexander L. ;
Gulya, Marina O. ;
Nesterov, Evgeny A. ;
Liga, Riccardo ;
Gimelli, Alessia .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 28 (01) :249-259
[34]   Does quantification of myocardial flow reserve using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography facilitate detection of multivessel coronary artery disease? [J].
Ziadi, Maria C. ;
deKemp, Robert A. ;
Williams, Kathryn ;
Guo, Ann ;
Renaud, Jennifer M. ;
Chow, Benjamin J. W. ;
Klein, Ran ;
Ruddy, Terrence D. ;
Aung, May ;
Garrard, Linda ;
Beanlands, Rob S. B. .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 19 (04) :670-680