Machine learning as a tool to identify inpatients who are not at risk of adverse drug events in a large dataset of a tertiary care hospital in the USA

被引:2
作者
Langenberger, Benedikt [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Berlin, Dept Hlth Care Management, Berlin, Germany
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
adverse drug events; decision support; machine learning; predictive modelling; OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVE; VARIABLE SELECTION; PREDICTION MODELS; AREA; EMERGENCY; CLASSIFICATION; REGULARIZATION; SURVEILLANCE; SENSITIVITY; IMPUTATION;
D O I
10.1111/bcp.15846
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
AimsAdverse drug events (ADEs) are a major threat to inpatients in the United States of America (USA). It is unknown how well machine learning (ML) is able to predict whether or not a patient will suffer from an ADE during hospital stay based on data available at hospital admission for emergency department patients of all ages (binary classification task). It is further unknown whether ML is able to outperform logistic regression (LR) in doing so, and which variables are the most important predictors. MethodsIn this study, 5 ML models- namely a random forest, gradient boosting machine (GBM), ridge regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, and elastic net regression-as well as a LR were trained and tested for the prediction of inpatient ADEs identified using ICD-10-CM codes based on comprehensive previous work in a diverse population. In total, 210 181 observations from patients who were admitted to a large tertiary care hospital after emergency department stay between 2011 and 2019 were included. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) and AUC-precision-recall (AUC-PR) were used as primary performance indicators. ResultsTree-based models performed best with respect to AUC and AUC-PR. The gradient boosting machine (GBM) reached an AUC of 0.747 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.735 to 0.759) and an AUC-PR of 0.134 (95% CI: 0.131 to 0.137) on unforeseen test data, while the random forest reached an AUC of 0.743 (95% CI: 0.731 to 0.755) and an AUC-PR of 0.139 (95% CI: 0.135 to 0.142), respectively. ML statistically significantly outperformed LR both on AUC and AUC-PR. Nonetheless, overall, models did not differ much with respect to their performance. Most important predictors were admission type, temperature and chief complaint for the best performing model (GBM). ConclusionsThe study demonstrated a first application of ML to predict inpatient ADEs based on ICD-10-CM codes, and a comparison with LR. Future research should address concerns arising from low precision and related problems.
引用
收藏
页码:3523 / 3538
页数:16
相关论文
共 104 条
  • [1] Incidence of adverse drug events in an academic hospital: a prospective cohort study
    Aljadhey, Hisham
    Mahmoud, Mansour A.
    Mayet, Ahmed
    Alshaikh, Mashael
    Ahmed, Yusuf
    Murray, Michael D.
    Bates, David W.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2013, 25 (06) : 648 - 655
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1950, Monthly Weather Review, DOI [DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1950)078ANDLT
  • [3] 0001:VOFEITANDGT
  • [4] 2.0.CO
  • [5] 2, 10.1175/1520-0493(1950)0782.0.CO
  • [6] 2]
  • [7] Ayyadevara V.K., 2018, PROMACHINE LEARNING, P117, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-4842-3564-5_6, 10.1007/978-1-4842-3564-5, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4842-3564-5, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4842-3564-56]
  • [8] The potential of artificial intelligence to improve patient safety: a scoping review
    Bates, David W.
    Levine, David
    Syrowatka, Ania
    Kuznetsova, Masha
    Craig, Kelly Jean Thomas
    Rui, Angela
    Jackson, Gretchen Purcell
    Rhee, Kyu
    [J]. NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2021, 4 (01)
  • [9] Two Decades Since To Err Is Human: An Assessment Of Progress And Emerging Priorities In Patient Safety
    Bates, David W.
    Singh, Hardeep
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2018, 37 (11) : 1736 - 1743
  • [10] INCIDENCE AND PREVENTABILITY OF ADVERSE DRUG EVENTS IN HOSPITALIZED ADULTS
    BATES, DW
    LEAPE, LL
    PETRYCKI, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1993, 8 (06) : 289 - 294