Machine learning as a tool to identify inpatients who are not at risk of adverse drug events in a large dataset of a tertiary care hospital in the USA

被引:1
|
作者
Langenberger, Benedikt [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Berlin, Dept Hlth Care Management, Berlin, Germany
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
adverse drug events; decision support; machine learning; predictive modelling; OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVE; VARIABLE SELECTION; PREDICTION MODELS; AREA; EMERGENCY; CLASSIFICATION; REGULARIZATION; SURVEILLANCE; SENSITIVITY; IMPUTATION;
D O I
10.1111/bcp.15846
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
AimsAdverse drug events (ADEs) are a major threat to inpatients in the United States of America (USA). It is unknown how well machine learning (ML) is able to predict whether or not a patient will suffer from an ADE during hospital stay based on data available at hospital admission for emergency department patients of all ages (binary classification task). It is further unknown whether ML is able to outperform logistic regression (LR) in doing so, and which variables are the most important predictors. MethodsIn this study, 5 ML models- namely a random forest, gradient boosting machine (GBM), ridge regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, and elastic net regression-as well as a LR were trained and tested for the prediction of inpatient ADEs identified using ICD-10-CM codes based on comprehensive previous work in a diverse population. In total, 210 181 observations from patients who were admitted to a large tertiary care hospital after emergency department stay between 2011 and 2019 were included. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) and AUC-precision-recall (AUC-PR) were used as primary performance indicators. ResultsTree-based models performed best with respect to AUC and AUC-PR. The gradient boosting machine (GBM) reached an AUC of 0.747 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.735 to 0.759) and an AUC-PR of 0.134 (95% CI: 0.131 to 0.137) on unforeseen test data, while the random forest reached an AUC of 0.743 (95% CI: 0.731 to 0.755) and an AUC-PR of 0.139 (95% CI: 0.135 to 0.142), respectively. ML statistically significantly outperformed LR both on AUC and AUC-PR. Nonetheless, overall, models did not differ much with respect to their performance. Most important predictors were admission type, temperature and chief complaint for the best performing model (GBM). ConclusionsThe study demonstrated a first application of ML to predict inpatient ADEs based on ICD-10-CM codes, and a comparison with LR. Future research should address concerns arising from low precision and related problems.
引用
收藏
页码:3523 / 3538
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predicting adverse drug events in older inpatients: a machine learning study
    Hu, Qiaozhi
    Wu, Bin
    Wu, Jinhui
    Xu, Ting
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2022, 44 (06) : 1304 - 1311
  • [2] Predicting adverse drug events in older inpatients: a machine learning study
    Qiaozhi Hu
    Bin Wu
    Jinhui Wu
    Ting Xu
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2022, 44 : 1304 - 1311
  • [3] Predicting Adverse Drug Events in Chinese Pediatric Inpatients With the Associated Risk Factors: A Machine Learning Study
    Yu, Ze
    Ji, Huanhuan
    Xiao, Jianwen
    Wei, Ping
    Song, Lin
    Tang, Tingting
    Hao, Xin
    Zhang, Jinyuan
    Qi, Qiaona
    Zhou, Yuchen
    Gao, Fei
    Jia, Yuntao
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [4] Applying Machine Learning to Identify Pediatric Patients at Risk of Critical Perioperative Adverse Events: using the APRICOT Dataset
    Lonsdale, Hannah
    Gray, Geoffrey M.
    Yates, Hannah
    Ahumada, Luis
    Rehman, Mohamed
    Varughese, Anna
    Fackler, Jim
    Habre, Walid
    Disma, Nicola
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2021, 132 (5S_SUPPL): : 759 - 760
  • [5] Adverse drug events in the elderly population admitted to a tertiary care hospital
    Azad, N
    Tierney, M
    Victor, G
    Kumar, P
    JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, 2002, 47 (05) : 295 - 305
  • [6] Clinical prediction rule to identify high-risk inpatients for adverse drug events: the JADE Study
    Sakuma, Mio
    Bates, David W.
    Morimoto, Takeshi
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2012, 21 (11) : 1221 - 1226
  • [7] Establishing a trigger tool based on global trigger tools to identify adverse drug events in obstetric inpatients in China
    Wu, Shan
    Yin, Qinan
    Wu, Liuyun
    Wu, Yue
    Yu, Nan
    Yan, Junfeng
    Bian, Yuan
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [8] Establishing a trigger tool based on global trigger tools to identify adverse drug events in obstetric inpatients in China
    Shan Wu
    Qinan Yin
    Liuyun Wu
    Yue Wu
    Nan Yu
    Junfeng Yan
    Yuan Bian
    BMC Health Services Research, 24
  • [9] Evaluation of Medication Error Related Adverse Drug Events Referred to Tertiary Care Hospital
    Katole, Nilesh
    Jadhav, Sunil
    Pawar, Sudhir
    Lokhande, Jaisen
    Kadhe, Neha
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 45 : S142 - S142
  • [10] Development of indicators for identifying adverse drug events in an Indian tertiary care teaching hospital
    Thiyagu, Rajakannan
    Mallayasamy, Surulivel R.
    Rajesh, Valakkathala
    Muralidhar, Varma
    Smitha, Prabhu
    Sudha, Vidyasagar
    Laxminarayana, Bairy K.
    DRUG HEALTHCARE AND PATIENT SAFETY, 2010, 2 : 95 - 100