e-Learning Evaluation Framework and Tools for Global Health and Public Health Education: Protocol for a Scoping Review

被引:2
作者
Bahattab, Awsan [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Hanna, Michel [3 ]
Voicescu, George Teo [1 ,3 ]
Hubloue, Ives [4 ]
Della Corte, Francesco [1 ,3 ]
Ragazzoni, Luca [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Res & Training Disaster Med Humanitarian Aid &, Novara, Italy
[2] Univ Piemonte Orientale, Dept Sustainable Dev & Ecol Transit, Vercelli, Italy
[3] Univ Piemonte Orientale, Dept Translat Med, Novara, Italy
[4] Vrije Univ Brussel, Res Grp Emergency & Disaster Med, Brussels, Belgium
[5] Ctr Res & Training Disaster Med Humanitarian Aid &, Via Lanino 1, I-28100 Novara, Italy
关键词
computer-assisted instruction; disaster medicine; disaster; e-learning; educational assessment; global health; medical education; public health; evaluation; scoping; review methods; review methodology; education; educational; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.2196/49955
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There has been a significant increase in the use of e-learning for global and public health education recently, especially following the COVID-19 pandemic. e-Learning holds the potential to offer equal opportunities, overcoming barriers like physical limitations and training costs. However, its effectiveness remains debated, with institutions unprepared for the sudden shift during the pandemic. To effectively evaluate the outcomes of e-learning, a standardized and rigorous approach is necessary. However, the existing literature on this subject often lacks standardized assessment tools and theoretical foundations, leading to ambiguity in the evaluation process. Consequently, it becomes imperative to identify a clear theoretical foundation and practical approach for evaluating global and public health e-learning outcomes.Objective: This protocol for a scoping review aims to map the state of e-learning evaluation in global and public health education to determine the existing theoretical evaluation frameworks, methods, tools, and domains and the gaps in research and practice.Methods: The scoping review will be conducted following the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. The initial search was performed in PubMed, Education Resource Information Center, Web of Science, and Scopus to identify peer-reviewed articles that report on the use of evaluation and assessment for e-learning training. The search strings combined the concepts of e-learning, public health, and health science education, along with evaluation and frameworks. After the initial search, a screening process will be carried out to determine the relevance of the identified studies to the research question. Data related to the characteristics of the included studies, the characteristics of the e-learning technology used in the studies, and the study outcomes will be extracted from the eligible articles. The extracted data will then undergo a structured, descriptive, quantitative, and qualitative content analysis to synthesize the information from the selected studies.Results: Initial database searches yielded a total of 980 results. Duplicates have been removed, and title and abstract screening of the 805 remaining extracted articles are underway. Quantitative and qualitative findings from the reviewed articles will be presented to answer the study objective.Conclusions: This scoping review will provide global and public health educators with a comprehensive overview of the current state of e-learning evaluation. By identifying existing e-learning frameworks and tools, the findings will offer valuable guidance for further advancements in global and public health e-learning evaluation. The study will also enable the creation of a comprehensive, evidence-based e-learning evaluation framework and tools, which will improve the quality and accountability of global health and public health education. Ultimately, this will contribute to better health outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Smart Mobile Learning Success Model for Higher Educational Institutions in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic [J].
Almaiah, Mohammed Amin ;
Ayouni, Sarra ;
Hajjej, Fahima ;
Lutfi, Abdalwali ;
Almomani, Omar ;
Awad, Ali Bani .
ELECTRONICS, 2022, 11 (08)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Electronic Learning Thesaurus
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Building A Digitally Resilient Workforce
[4]  
Arksey H., 2005, International journal of social research methodology, V8, P19, DOI [DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616, 10.1080/1364557032000119616]
[5]   Health Professions' Digital Education: Review of Learning Theories in Randomized Controlled Trials by the Digital Health Education Collaboration [J].
Bajpai, Shweta ;
Semwal, Monika ;
Bajpai, Ram ;
Car, Josip ;
Ho, Andy Hau Yan .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (03)
[6]   Evaluation of e-learning for medical education in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review [J].
Barteit, Sandra ;
Guzek, Dorota ;
Jahn, Albrecht ;
Baernighausen, Till ;
Jorge, Margarida Mendes ;
Neuhann, Florian .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2020, 145
[7]  
Bezhovski Z, 2011, Inf Knowl Manag, V6, P50
[8]  
Bond M, 2021, INT J EDUC TECHNOL H, V18, DOI 10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x
[9]   Digital Education in Health Professions: The Need for Overarching Evidence Synthesis [J].
Car, Josip ;
Carlstedt-Duke, Jan ;
Car, Lorainne Tudor ;
Posadzki, Pawel ;
Whiting, Penny ;
Zary, Nabil ;
Atun, Rifat ;
Majeed, Azeem ;
Campbell, James .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (02)
[10]   Teaching epidemiology in the digital age: considerations for academicians and their students [J].
Caron, Rosemary M. .
ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (09) :576-579