Spatial mismatch between wild bee diversity hotspots and protected areas

被引:8
|
作者
Casanelles-Abella, Joan [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Fontana, Simone [3 ,4 ]
Meier, Eliane [5 ]
Moretti, Marco [1 ]
Fournier, Betrand [6 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Forest Snow & Landscape Res WSL, Biodivers & Conservat Biol, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Terr Ecosyst, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Freiburg, Nat Conservat & Landscape Ecol, Freiburg, Germany
[4] Kanton St Gallen, Abt Nat & Landschaft, Amt Nat Jagd & Fischerei, Kanton St Gallen,, St Gallen, Switzerland
[5] Agroscope, Agroecol & Environm, Zurich, Switzerland
[6] Univ Potsdam, Inst Environm Sci & Geog, Potsdam, Germany
[7] Swiss Fed Inst Forest Snow & Landscape Res WSL, Biodivers & Conservat Biol, Zurcherstr 111, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”; 瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Anthophila; biodiversity facet; community-based conservation; elevation gradient; protected area; Switzerland; urbanization; FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY; BETA-DIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; RICHNESS; PATTERNS; GRADIENT; MODELS;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.14082
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Wild bees are critical for multiple ecosystem functions but are currently threatened. Understanding the determinants of the spatial distribution of wild bee diversity is a major research gap for their conservation. We modeled wild bee a and ss taxonomic and functional diversity in Switzerland to uncover countrywide diversity patterns and determine the extent to which they provide complementary information, assess the importance of the different drivers structuring wild bee diversity, identify hotspots of wild bee diversity, and determine the overlap between diversity hotspots and the network of protected areas. We used site-level occurrence and trait data from 547 wild bee species across 3343 plots and calculated community attributes, including taxonomic diversity metrics, community mean trait values, and functional diversity metrics. We modeled their distribution with predictors describing gradients of climate, resource availability (vegetation), and anthropogenic influence (i.e., land-use types and beekeeping intensity). Wild bee diversity changed along gradients of climate and resource availability; high-elevation areas had lower functional and taxonomic a diversity, and xeric areas harbored more diverse bee communities. Functional and taxonomic ss diversities diverged from this pattern, with high elevations hosting unique species and trait combinations. The proportion of diversity hotspots included in protected areas depended on the biodiversity facet, but most diversity hotspots occurred in unprotected land. Climate and resource availability gradients drove spatial patterns of wild bee diversity, resulting in lower overall diversity at higher elevations, but simultaneously greater taxonomic and functional uniqueness. This spatial mismatch among distinct biodiversity facets and the degree of overlap with protected areas is a challenge to wild bee conservation, especially in the face of global change, and calls for better integrating unprotected land. The application of spatial predictive models represents a valuable tool to aid the future development of protected areas and achieve wild bee conservation goals.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Spatial shifts in steppe bird hotspots over two decades: Assessing conservation priorities and the role of protected areas☆
    Medrano-Vizcaino, Pablo
    Benitez-Lopez, Anna
    Traba, Juan
    Arroyo, Beatriz
    Bota, Gerard
    Morales, Manuel B.
    Mougeot, Francois
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2025, 305
  • [42] From hotspots to site protection: Identifying Marine Protected Areas for seabirds around the globe
    Lascelles, Ben G.
    Langham, Gary M.
    Ronconi, Robert A.
    Reid, James B.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2012, 156 : 5 - 14
  • [43] Global spatial coincidence between protected areas and metal mining activities
    Duran, America P.
    Rauch, Jason
    Gaston, Kevin J.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2013, 160 : 272 - 278
  • [44] Agroecosystem landscape diversity shapes wild bee communities independent of managed honey bee presence
    St Clair, Ashley L.
    Zhang, Ge
    Dolezal, Adam G.
    O'Neal, Matthew E.
    Toth, Amy L.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 327
  • [45] The complex relationships between marine protected areas and marine spatial planning: Towards an analytical framework
    Trouillet, Brice
    Jay, Stephen
    MARINE POLICY, 2021, 127
  • [46] Evaluating functional diversity conservation for freshwater fishes resulting from terrestrial protected areas
    Lamothe, Karl A.
    Alofs, Karen M.
    Chu, Cindy
    FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (11) : 2057 - 2070
  • [47] Odonata Diversity and Ecological Thresholds in Protected Areas of the Brazilian Amazon
    Sousa, Kenned Silva
    Brito, Joas Silva
    Cruz, Gabriel Martins
    Bastos, Rafael Costa
    Mendoza-Penagos, Cristian Camilo
    Silva, Everton
    Montag, Luciano
    Oliveira Junior, Jose Max Barbosa
    Brejao, Gabriel
    Casatti, Lilian
    Michelan, Thaisa Sala
    Juen, Leandro
    Dias-Silva, Karina
    NEOTROPICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2025, 54 (01)
  • [48] Biological diversity in protected areas: Not yet known but already threatened
    Eduardo Rico-Sanchez, Axel
    Sundermann, Andrea
    Lopez-Lopez, Eugenia
    Jonatan Torres-Olvera, Martin
    Ashley Mueller, Sarah
    Joschka Haubrock, Phillip
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2020, 22
  • [49] National parks as protected areas for US freshwater fish diversity
    Lawrence, David J.
    Larson, Eric R.
    Liermann, Cathy A. Reidy
    Mims, Meryl C.
    Pool, Thomas K.
    Olden, Julian D.
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2011, 4 (05): : 364 - 371
  • [50] Open forest successional stages and landscape heterogeneity promote wild bee diversity in temperate forests
    Eckerter, Tristan
    Braunisch, Veronika
    Buse, Jorn
    Klein, Alexandra M.
    CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2022, 4 (12)